Question: Were there Kabbalists who violated the rule against touching the secrets of the Torah prematurely, before they had completed their own corrections?

Answer: I do not want to go into this because we are not yet capable of discussing such topics. Questions will immediately arise: “How did they do it? For what reason? Why did the Creator allow this? Where was the general and individual governance? Was it a mistake or to the contrary?” There are many stories, and it is not for us from our degree to analyze them.

Why do we go above reason in order to ascend from degree to degree? Because the mind of the higher degree is literally opposite to my mind. I am simply incapable of discussing such degrees. We can only, so to speak, console ourselves with the formulations, and make some understanding in order to continue on the path.

In the same way, children are told fairy tales and fables so that they will grow. And when they become adults, they see that everything is somewhat different. However, they cannot yet grasp with their minds the full complexity of human relationships and world processes, and that is why they are presented with these things in a simple form corresponding to their understanding, and thanks to this they grow.

It is the same for us. It is impossible to take such questions seriously. It is good that they exist, but we must understand that every question is a Hisaron, the fulfillment of which can be seen not at our degree, but many degrees higher. Therefore, the question is different: how can a Hisaron (lack) arise in me, the fulfillment of which lies, say, ten degrees higher? What does its present revelation mean?

Actually, this is not even a question, because from this I must derive the understanding that I actually need to possess a yearning to reach the highest degree—even if an unconscious need.

I will put it differently. There must be a Hisaron, a need for a state of infinity within the limits of my current level, but a need for the state of infinity. Because at every degree it is precisely infinity that is revealed, only to a different extent, first a little, then a little more, then even more.

It is perfectly normal that I have questions about the highest degree because I must strive for infinity. In essence, I am already in it now, but only a very, very small measure of infinity is revealed to me, although it is revealed in every detail. In every detail, but in a very, very limited way. Limited, but equally present in all those details.

And if the smallest degree of infinity is revealed to me, then it will be revealed in all the details that exist in infinity. However, in my eyes it will appear so unclear that it will seem very small, very vague, but infinite to me.

Therefore questions will arise throughout the entire path up to the final goal, even at the smallest degree.
[360481]
From the Daily Kabbalah Lesson 8/16/26, Rabash, “What Is, ‘Return, O Israel, Unto the Lord Your God,’ in the Work?”

You cannot make happiness out of unhappiness. From unhappiness, you should only understand that you need to attain happiness.

Question: So, are you saying that all that is required of us is simply the effort to attain happiness?

Answer: Yes!

Question: Just the effort? To build this state of happiness and try to attain it?

Answer: Yes.

Question: I have a somewhat cautious question. The utopians once aspired to this. What is the difference between what you are proposing and what those utopians proposed? The City of the Sun, for example?

Answer: The utopians did not base their ideas on nature, the real nature in which we exist.

Question: What do you mean by nature?

Answer: The egoism in which we exist. They believed that you could simply take it and raise it, want to change it, and make this happen.

Question: Just take a person and place him in the City of the Sun?

Answer: But you have to actually create that City of the Sun yourself! It does not just grow out of our fantasies.

Question: And when you say that we need to imagine happiness, what stages do we need to go through to do this?

Answer: I mean that, standing on the foundation of all the suffering that exists, relying on it, we must realize that the only way to create something opposite to it is to change our relationships with one another. Therefore, we need to take care of our education: personal, social, group, and family, education at every level.

Question: Is this what you call “building a happy society”?

Answer: Of course. It depends solely on people’s attitude toward one another, and on nothing else.

Comment: Stones, technologies—all of that…

My Response: No, none of those matter.

Question: To sum it up, you are saying that if I am currently suffering, in pain, and at a dead end, then in order to get out of it, I need to picture, to imagine…?

Answer: The opposite state. The cause of suffering lies in my own “self,” in the fact that we are opposite to one another, that we hate, that we do not love, repel one another, and seek to profit from one another. If we want happiness, we must free ourselves from personal self-interest and, instead, raise the interest of society as a whole.

Comment: So I should wish happiness for another person, and then I myself…

Answer: For everyone!

Comment: Even for everyone. And then it will, as it were, return to me as the same happiness.

My Response: Yes. I myself will exist within all of this.
[359991]
From KabTV’s “News with Dr. Michael Laitman,” 7/30/26

Question: It is written that a person should sell everything he owns and marry a daughter of a sage. Why must one marry the daughter of a wise man?

Answer: The “wise man” or “sage” is the Creator. One who studies His wisdom is called a “disciple of the sage.” The vessel, the desire for this, is called the “daughter of the wise disciple.”

We have a desire to receive. In its corrected sate it is called “male” and “woman” in the uncorrected form. There are various designations, but by marrying the daughter of a wise disciple, i.e., acquiring the desire to receive and correcting it into an intention for the sake of giving, in an effort to become a disciple of the wise, with the help of this desire, a person comes to work for the Creator, to become like the Creator.

Question: What is this special Kli of a wise disciples daughter? After all, every vessel is a desire to receive.

Answer: Indeed, in the end, all desires will turn into proper vessels to the degree they are corrected. However, this is not yet so during the process of correction. During the process of correction, there are many desires that a person must concea; one should not to work with all them, but rather filter out the few that can be brought to an intention for the sake of bestowal, to work for the Creator.

Question: When does it start? Once people come to “religion,” that is, to the right intention?

Answer: Before a person became “religious,” a material desire to receive already formed within them. What I mean is that before a person began to correct himself, he was already walking in the middle line (Daat, Tifferet, and Yesod), yet his desire to receive was aimed at himself with the intention to receive. When he starts working for the sake of givinbestowing, he brings everything in line with this intention and screen, which is called becoming “religious.”

Then a different kind of work begins: a person filters out his desires, selecting the right ones he can work with. Some desires are impossible to work with at all; for example, the stony heart (Lev Ha Even), the prohibitive commandments speak about it.

A person takes the desires he can work with, according to the extent and form it is possible and how they can be combined, and begins to refocus them on the intention for the sake of giving. This is how he builds his middle line.
[360292]
From the Daily Kabbalah Lesson 8/12/26, Rabash, “One Should Always Sell Everything He Has and Marry a Wise Disciple’s Daughter”

Question: Why did a person have more strength for giving before they came to “religion,” that is, before they acquired the right intention?

Answer: When the desire to receive is revealed to a person in the ordinary way, as it happens with everyone, the person sees that in one part of this desire they can receive, and in another part give.

In some cases, I derive pleasure from giving, and in others from receiving. In each person, these qualities are mixed in their own way; based on these we can tell whether a person is good or bad, whether their actions are wonderful or repulsive. However, all of a person’s desires, both giving and receiving, are directed toward their own benefit.

When a person begins to compare themselves with the true properties of bestowing, which are devoid of any intention for self-benefit, they evaluate everything very differently. Then, both acts of receiving and giving appear to one as essentially the same from the start, for they all serve the single intention: to receive. Consequently, they are all flawed. The person sees a twofold evil in themselves.

First, he previously thought receiving was normal and natural; now he realizes it is bad. Secondly, in the past, when he gave, he thought he was performing good deeds, he had motivation and a sense of self-importance; he felt like a worthy human being.

Indeed, we derive pleasure from giving; it boosts our self‑esteem, feeds our pride, and so on. Even the lowest, most terrible person experiences such feelings; it seems to them that they are giving up something for the sake of others. Now, however, he sees that what he deemed to be to his merit—acts of giving or expressions of his own humanity, was also for the sake of receiving something in return. Thus, a person becomes a villain twice over in their own eyes.

They feel that all their actions are bad, awful, and the urge to give something to someone feels even worse, which plunges a person into despair. Furthermore, beyond the all-encompassing intention to receive, even stronger desires are revealed to them. The person suddenly realizes they do not care about anything: let their children perish, let the whole world disappear, it makes no difference. Their ego is so locked within itself that it takes nothing outside the boundaries of his own body into account.

Then the desire to receive presents an even grimmer picture: they do not care about anything outside themself nor about what will happen a moment later. Let me perish in a second, I am alive until the next second and that is enough. The desire to receive focuses so intensely on this particular point—the present moment and only within itself—that this point becomes its absolute limit. A limit in both time and space.

Therefore, we reveal not how great our desire to receive is, but the extent to which it is locked within itself. It is endlessly absorbed in itself,indifferent to everything else! It is immense precisely because of this terrible quality of inwardly directed self‑sufficiency.

Then a person finds themselves in a state where they do not know how to escape this condition. They feel very bad. If they had simply acknowledged this within themselves without the accompanying realization of its nature, they would not feel anything negative; they would accept that is just how I am. We see that many people in the world commit terrible things, and they even feel better than those who seem to be doing good.

The problem is that when a person is about to “return to religion,” i.e., to acquire a middle line, to work in Daat, Tiferet, and Yesod, they see themselves as bad in relation to the surrounding light. They become split, experiencing a terrible feeling from comparing themselves to the standard, to the properties of the surrounding light. They simply go crazy; such moments are so intense. This is the beginning of the recognition of evil.
[360297]
From the Daily Kabbalah Lesson 8/12/26, Rabash, “One Should Always Sell Everything He Has and Marry a Wise Disciple’s Daughter”