The transcript has been transcribed and edited from English simultaneous interpretation, thus there may be potential semantic inaccuracies within it.
Daily Lesson (Morning) April 30, 2024.
Part 1: Rabash. Article No. 9, One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future (1987)
Reader: Hello, we are reading in the Writings of Rabash, Part 1, page 456, Article, “One's Greatness Depends on the Measure of One's Faith in the Future.” The study material is on the SvivaTova and the Arvut system. Likewise, you can ask questions on those sites. Everyone who is in the study hall is requested to stand up, hold the mic close to the mouth, and ask the question clearly and concisely. Article, “One's Greatness Depends on the Measure of one's Faith in the Future.”
Reading Article: (00:43) “One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future.”
It is written in The Zohar (BeShalach, Item 216): “‘Then shall Moses ... sing.’ It should have said, ‘Sang.’ And it replies, ‘But this thing depends on the future when he complemented for that time and complemented for the future, when Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future.’ ‘This singing’ is in female form [in Hebrew], but it should have said, ‘This song,’ in male form [in Hebrew]. And it replies, ‘This singing is that the queen praises the King.’ Rabbi Yehuda said, ‘Thus, if it is the singing of the queen to the King, why does it say, ‘Moses and the children of Israel’? After all, the queen should have been the one who is praising.’ It replies, ‘Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the Queen.’”
We should understand the answer that he gives about what is written in future tense, that it refers to the future. What does it come to teach us in the work? We should also understand about the answer he is giving, why it writes “singing” in female form, which interprets the intention to Malchut, meaning that Malchut is praising the King, about which Rabbi Yehuda asked. Thus, if he is referring to Malchut, why does it say, “Moses and the children of Israel”? For this reason, he must interpret that his intention is Moses and Israel, who know how to praise the King for the Malchut. We should also understand the meaning of Moses and Israel having to praise the King for the Malchut, and why they do not have to praise the King for themselves, but for Malchut.
It is known that Moses is called “the faithful shepherd.” Baal HaSulam interpreted that Moses was providing Israel with faith, and faith is called Malchut [kingship]. In other words, he instilled fear of heaven, called the “kingdom of heaven,” into the people of Israel. This is why Moses is called “the faithful shepherd,” after the faith. It is written about it, “And they believed in the Lord and in his servant, Moses,” meaning for Moses instilling in them faith in the Creator.
It is known that one cannot live from negativity but from positivity. This is so because “nourishment” refers to what a person receives and enjoys receiving. This comes to us from the purpose of creation, called “His desire to do good to His creations.” Therefore, a person must receive delight and pleasure so as to have something with which to delight one’s body. This is called “positivity,” meaning a filling. And with this filling, he satisfies his needs.
But a person also needs a lack. Otherwise, there is no place in which the light of life can enter. A lack is called “a Kli” [a vessel]. This means that if one has no Kelim [vessels], he cannot receive anything. A lack is called “a desire,” meaning that he has a desire for something and he feels that he is lacking this thing and wishes to satisfy the need. To the extent that he feels its absence and to the extent that he needs to satisfy his need, this is the measure of his lack. In other words, a great lack or a small lack depends on the measure of one’s sense of necessity to satisfy that need.
This means that if a person comes to feel that he is lacking something, and he feels that feeling in his every organ, yet he does not have a strong desire to satisfy his need, there are many reasons why he does not have such a great desire to satisfy his need.
He told his friends what he needs, and he feels the necessity for it. However, the friends made him see that what he needs is unattainable. So his friends influenced him with their views that he must accept his situation. They weakened his strength to overcome so he can prevail over the obstacles on his way to obtaining what he wants. In consequence, the need and craving weakened, too, since he sees that he will never obtain what he wants. For this reason, meaning because he sees that it is utterly impossible that he will ever be able to satisfy his need, this is the reason why he does not obtain his goal—it causes him to lessen his lack. It turns out that his great desire has waned due to despair.
Sometimes he does not even tell his friends what he wants; he only hears from friends speaking with each other. He hears that they have already given up, and that affects him, too. In other words, their despair affects him and he loses the enthusiasm that he had for achieving Dvekut [adhesion] as soon as possible. Thus, he loses that willpower.
Sometimes one thinks for himself without any slander from the outside, but sees that each time he wishes to draw near to Kedusha [holiness], when he begins to analyze, he realizes the opposite, that he is regressing instead of moving forward. And this causes him to lose his strength for the work.
It turns out that then he collapses under his load. He has nothing from which to receive sustenance because he sees only negativity and darkness. Thus, he loses the spirit of life that he had when he seemingly had some livelihood, called “sustaining his soul.” Now he feels spiritually dead, meaning he cannot make a single movement in the work, just as if he were actually dead.
This means that even though now he sees the truth, meaning the recognition of evil, it is negative, and from this, one cannot receive any livelihood, since provision of the body is specifically from positivity. Therefore, one must walk on the right line for two reasons: 1) to keep his desire from waning when he hears slander, 2) to receive vitality, which is specifically from positivity, meaning that it is positive, that there is a matter of wholeness here.
However, it is difficult to understand how, when he criticizes his work-order and sees that his being immersed in self-love is the truth, how can he be told to walk on the right line, which is called “wholeness”? After all, as far as he can see, when he judges honestly, it is a total lie.
It is known that general and particular are equal. This means that the individual follows the same order that applies to the collective. In regard to the collective, it was given to us to believe in the coming of the Messiah (in the prayer, “I Believe”), “I believe in the coming of the Messiah. And though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”
Hence, one must never give up and say, “I see that I cannot obtain Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator.” This is considered that he exits the exile among the nations of the world, called “self-love,” and comes under the authority of Kedusha [holiness], and comes to correct the root of his soul and cling to the Life of Lives.
It follows that if one believes in the general redemption, he should believe that redemption will come to him in particular. Hence, one should receive wholeness for himself with respect to the future, in a way that one should depict for himself the measure of goodness, pleasure, and joy that he will receive when all his needs are satisfied. This certainly gives him emotional satisfaction and energy to work to obtain this goal that he hopes to achieve.
It turns out that first one must depict for himself what he is hoping for—that it will make him happy and joyful if he obtains what he anticipates. However, first one should thoroughly know the goal he wants to obtain. If one does not pay close attention and much scrutiny to what he expects from his life, meaning that he should tell himself, “Now I have decided what I want, after analyzing the joy in life that can be obtained in the world.”
If he has the opportunity to obtain this, he will have the strength and wisdom to say, “Now I can thank the Creator for creating His world.” Now he can wholeheartedly say, “Blessed is He who said, ‘Let there be the world,’ since I feel the delight and pleasure, that it is truly worthwhile for me and for all creations to receive this delight and pleasure that I have now received from the purpose of creation, called ‘His desire to do good to His creations.’”
And although he is still far from obtaining the goal, if he nonetheless knows for certain from what he can receive his future happiness, it is as it is written (Avot, Chapter 6), “Rabbi Meir says, ‘Anyone who engages in Torah Lishma [for Her sake] is rewarded with a great many things. Moreover, the whole world is worthwhile for him. He is let into the secrets of the Torah and he becomes like an everlasting spring.’”
When he pays attention to this—to what he can achieve—meaning when he feels the importance of the goal and depicts for himself the happiness he will achieve, the joy that he will experience when he attains it is unimaginable.
Thus, to the extent that he believes in the importance of the goal, and to the extent that he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can receive the filling of the light of life from the future goal. It is known that there is inner light and there is surrounding light. Baal HaSulam interpreted “inner light” as referring to what one receives in the present, and “surrounding light” as the light that is destined to shine, but which one has not yet attained. However, the surrounding light shines, to an extent, in the present, to the extent of his confidence that he will attain it.
He said that this is like a person who bought merchandise from the market. Since many people brought this merchandise to the market, it had little value. All the merchants wanted to sell the merchandise at any price, but there were no buyers because everyone was afraid to buy, perhaps it might grow even cheaper.
Then one man bought all the merchandise for a very low price. When he came home and told them what happened in the market, they all laughed at him: “What did you do? Of course, all the merchants wanted to sell all the merchandise they had in stock. This will only make everything cheaper, and as a result, you will lose all your money.”
But he insisted, saying, “Now I am happier than ever since I will profit from this merchandise not as before, when I knew I could get twenty percent profit from the merchandise. Instead, I’ll make a five hundred percent profit. However, I will not sell it now. I will store it and I will take it to the market in three years, for by then this merchandise will not be found here in the country, and I will get the price that I want.”
It turns out that if he calculates how much he has earned in the present, meaning this year, then he has nothing. This is considered that he has nothing in the present with which to be happy.
This is an allegory about the inner light, which shines in the present. However, the surrounding light, called “light that shines specifically in the future,” shines in the present, too, to the extent of his belief that in the future he will receive the full reward he hopes for, and then his joy will be complete. Now he is receiving joy and high spirits from what he will receive in the future.
This explains the above allegory, that this merchant was ridiculed by everyone for buying the merchandise in the market precisely when it was irrelevant, when no one wanted to buy it. Yet, he bought it as something that others left because it was worthless, and now he is delighted because he is one hundred percent sure that in three years this merchandise will not be found anywhere and then he will get rich. And so, he enjoys in the present what will happen in the future.
It follows that to the extent that he believes that it will come to him—and does not despair about the future—as it is written, “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can enjoy in the present what will come in the future.
Thus, when a person is told that even though he walked on the left line—meaning criticized and saw that he was in utter baseness—and he sees this truth, since he does not wish to deceive himself and justify his thoughts and actions, but seeks the truth and does not care if the truth is bitter, yet he wishes to reach the goal for which he was born, but because of all this truth he cannot go on living, since it is impossible to live without pleasure, called “vitality” and “life.” To live, one needs light, which revives a person. By living, it is possible to work and to reach the goal. For this reason, he must then shift to the right line, called “wholeness.”
However, this wholeness—from which he now receives the liveliness that sustains his body—should be built on a basis of truth. This brings up the question, “How can he receive wholeness when he sees the truth, that he is in the lowest state, immersed in self-love from head to toe and without a spark of bestowal?”
To that he should say, “Everything I see is true.” However, it is so from the perspective of the inner light. This means that in the present, he is in lowliness and has nothing from which to receive joy and life. But from the perspective of the surrounding light, which is the future, he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”
It turns out that through the surrounding light that shines in relation to the future, he can draw it so it will shine in the present. And to the extent of the faith and confidence that he has in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, he can draw vitality and joy so it will shine in the present.
It follows that now that he is walking on the right line to receive wholeness, it is the real truth since the surrounding light shines in the present. And besides, it is a path of truth, and since by believing in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, it is a great remedy that through the commandment of faith, the future will draw nearer to the present in him. This means that the surrounding light will be internal. This is considered that the light actually dresses in the present. It is called “the surrounding will become internal.”
Thus, from here—meaning from faith, from believing that in the end he will reach the goal, even though reason shows him each time that he is retreating from the goal and not advancing—he overcomes and goes above reason. And then faith itself accumulates each time in the form of “penny by penny joins into a great amount,” until he is rewarded with permanent whole faith, which is the attainment of the light of Hassadim in illumination of Hochma, as it is written in the Sulam commentary.
Now we can understand what we asked about why The Zohar explains that this is why it is written, “Shall ... sing,” in future tense. By that, it implies that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. What does that come to teach us in the work? In matters of work, we should know what we have now, in the present, and know what we must do. Thus, what can we learn about what the future holds?
As we explained, we must walk on the right line, which is wholeness, and receive vitality from it, because it is impossible to live from negativity. Hence, there is advice to feel wholeness from what will be in the future. This is the meaning of what the righteous call, “singing in the future.” In other words, now—in the present—they are singing about what they will receive in the future. This means that to the extent that they picture the delight and pleasure they will receive in the future, they can feel it in the present, provided they have faith that there is a future, meaning that in the future everyone will be corrected.
This is something one can already be thankful for in the present. To the extent that he feels it, this is the measure of the praise that he can give in the present. And besides receiving life in the present from positivity, he gains from the goal in general being important for him because he must picture for himself the delight and pleasure in store for the creatures to receive.
And each time he contemplates the matter, he gradually sees a bit more of what he can receive in the future, meaning what has been prepared for us by the purpose of creation. And although he sees that in his current state he is miles away from the goal, this depends on the measure of his faith in the goal, as in the example of the allegory above. This follows the rule, “All that is certain to be collected is deemed collected” (Yevamot 38).
With the above, we can understand what The Zohar explains—that the reason why it writes “Shall ... sing,” in future tense, is to imply that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. This is so because we must know this, so we can receive joy and vitality in the present from what will be in the future. By this, we can sing in the present as if now we were receiving all the delight and pleasure.
This is regarded as being able to receive illumination from a surrounding. In other words, the surrounding shines in the internal from afar, meaning that although a person is still far from obtaining the delight and pleasure, he can still draw illumination from the Surrounding Light also in the present.
Now we will explain what we asked about The Zohar explaining why he writes, “This singing” in female form [in Hebrew]. It is because Moses and Israel know how to properly praise the King for the queen. And we asked, “Why do Moses and Israel not praise the King for themselves?”
First, we must understand why we have to praise the King. In corporeality, we understand that a flesh and blood king needs honors, to be respected. He enjoys the praises that the people give him. But with regard to the Creator, why does He need us to praise Him and sing before Him chants and songs?
It is a known rule that everything we say in regard to the Creator is only by way of “By Your actions we know You.” However, there is no attainment in Him, Himself, whatsoever. Rather, all we speak of relates to the attainment of the lower ones.
This is the reason why one must praise and thank the Creator, for by this one can measure and assume the greatness and importance of the giving that the Creator has given him. To that extent, one can test how much importance and greatness of the King he feels.
The purpose of creation is to do good to His creations, meaning for the creatures to enjoy Him. And by the measure of the greatness of the Giver, there is meaning and pleasure in giving, that they give Him in order to delight. And when one tries to give thanks, he already has reason for considering and scrutinizing the giving: what he received and from whom he received, meaning the greatness of the giving and the greatness of the giver.
It follows that one’s gratitude should not be because the upper one will enjoy it, but so that the lower one will enjoy it. Otherwise, it is similar to the allegory that Baal HaSulam said about the verse, “Who has not taken My name in vain.”
He asked, “What does it mean that a person takes in vain? Does it mean that he was given a soul from above in vain?” He said that it is similar to a child being given a bag of gold coins. He is delighted about the coins because they look so nice and are lovely to look at. But the child is incapable of assessing the value of the gold coins.
From this we can understand that the gratitude and praise that we give to the Creator are only to benefit the creatures, meaning that we have something by which to praise the King. This means that when one tries to praise the Creator, this is the time when he is capable of feeling the importance of the gift and the importance of the giver of the gift. For this reason, what one should mind most is the praise that one gives to the King. This enables him to be given every time anew. Otherwise, if one cannot appreciate the King’s gift, one cannot be given anything because he falls under the definition of “Who is a fool? He who loses what he is given” (Hagigah 4a).
And what is the reason that a fool loses what he is given? This is simple: He is a fool. He does not appreciate the importance of the matter, so he does not pay attention to keeping the gift that he has been given. For this reason, the extent of the importance of the gift is his keeping of it. Thus, he can be in a state of constant ascension because it is evident that he does not lose what he is given, for he appreciates it.
It follows from the above that one may have many descents because he does not appreciate the gift of the King. In other words, he cannot appreciate the measure of importance of the nearing—that he has been given from above a desire and a thought that it is worthwhile to be a servant of the Creator.
And since he did not appreciate the importance of the matter, meaning the calling that he was given—to enter and serve the King—he might even corrupt if he serves the King without knowing how to keep himself from blemishing something. In that state, a person is thrown back to a place of garbage and waste.
In that state, he sustains himself on the same waste that cats and dogs search to sustain themselves, and he, too, searches for provision for his body in that place. He does not see that he can find provision elsewhere. Meaning, during the descent, those things that he said were waste and unfit as food for humans—but are suitable as food only for animals—he himself chases that provision and has no desire for human food because he finds it completely tasteless.
For this reason, the stability of the states of ascent depends primarily on the importance of the matter. This is why it depends mainly on the praise and gratitude he gives to being accepted from above. This is so because the praises themselves that he gives to the Creator enhance His importance and esteem. This is why we are commanded to think very seriously about praising.
There are three discernments in regard to praising:
1. The measure of the giving. This means that the importance of the gift is according to the measure of praise and gratitude that one gives for the gift.
2. The greatness of the giver, meaning if the giver is an important person. For example, if the king gives a present to someone, the gift may be a very small thing but it will still be very important. In other words, the measure of the praise and gratitude does not take the greatness of the gift into account but rather measures the greatness of the giver. Meaning, the same person might give to two people, but to one, the giver is more important and he recognizes the importance and greatness of the giver. Thus, he will be more grateful than the other, who does not recognize the importance of the giver to the same extent.
3. The greatness of the giver, regardless of whether he gives or not. Sometimes, the king is so important in the eyes of a person, that the person has a strong desire to merely speak to the King, but not because he wishes to speak to the King so the King will give him something. He doesn’t want anything, but his whole pleasure is in having the privilege of speaking to the King.
However, it is impolite to come to the king without some request, so he is searching for some request that the king may grant. In other words, he says that he wants to come to the king so the king will give him something, but in truth, he says that he wants the king to give him something only on the outside. In his heart, he does not want anything from the king. Just having the ability to speak to the king is enough for him and it does not matter to him if the king has given him something or not.
When people on the outside see that he did not receive a thing from the king, and look at him as he is walking out of the king’s house delighted and elated, they laugh at him. They tell him, “What a fool you are! How mindless are you? You can see for yourself that you are leaving as empty-handed as you came in. You walked into the king to ask for something of the king, yet you walked out empty-handed, so why the joy?”
We can understand this if while a person prays to the Creator to give him something, we can discern about it, 1) that one prays to the Creator to give him what he demands of the Creator. If the Creator accepts his demand for the prayer to be granted, when he receives what he wants, he is willing to thank the Creator. And the extent of salvation that he received from the Creator is the extent of his joy, high spirits, praise, and gratitude. In other words, everything is measured by the degree of salvation he has received from the Creator.
2) The measure of the greatness of the Giver. In other words, to the extent that he believes in the greatness of the Creator, this is what determines for him what he receives from the Creator. That is, even though in the eyes of the receiver it is a small thing, he still received something from the Creator. Thus, he can already be happy and praise and thank the Creator, since it is the giver who is important to him, as in the above-mentioned allegory.
3) The greatness of the giver without giving. He, too, has great importance. In other words, the King is so important in his eyes that he does not want anything from the King, but will consider it a great fortune if he can speak even a few words with the King. And the reason why he comes in with some request is only superficial since one cannot come before the King without some request. Yet, he did not come for the king to grant his request. The reason he said he was asking for something was only for the external ones, who do not understand that speaking to the king is the most valuable giving, but the external ones do not understand it.
When we speak of a single body, we should say that “external ones” are the thoughts that come to a person from the outside world, meaning those who have no concept of the internality and who have no tools to understand that the internality of the king is what counts. Rather, they value the king only by what extends from the king to them, which is called “the externality of the king.” But they have no clue of the internality of the king, meaning the king himself and not what extends from the king outward.
Hence, these thoughts mock a person when he says, “Since I just spoke to the king, it does not matter if the king is granting my wish.” Rather, his only wish is the internality of the king, not what extends from him.
Therefore, if a person prays to the Creator and does not see that the Creator has given him something—since what matters to him is the internality of the king—he can be happy and rejoice in having been rewarded with speaking to the king. Yet, external thoughts within him wish to revoke that joy in him because they consider only the vessels of reception—what he has received from the king in his vessels of reception, while he tells them, “I am delighted and joyful, and I praise and thank the king simply for having given me the chance to speak with him. This is enough for me.”
Moreover, he says to his external ones, “Know that I want nothing from the king except to praise him and thank him. By this, I adhere to the king because I want to bestow upon him by praising him. I have nothing else to give him. It follows that now I am considered ‘a servant of the Creator,’ and not ‘a servant of myself.’ For this reason, I cannot hear you telling me, ‘What have you gained?’”
“For example, all year long you engaged in Torah and in prayer, keeping all the Mitzvot [commandments], but you are still standing on the same degree as a year ago or two ago. Thus, why the joy that you praise the Creator and say, ‘This is my gain, that I spoke to the Creator many times, and what else do I need?’ In other words, if the king had given me something, I might have received it in order to receive. But now that I have nothing in my hand, I am happy and thank the Creator because my intention in the work was only to bestow.”
However, since in that state a person is telling the truth, he faces strong resistance from the external ones, who cannot tolerate one who is walking on the path of truth, if his only aim is to bestow. In that state, he has a great war, and they wish to shatter his joy. They make him think that the opposite is true—that what they are telling him is the path of truth, and that he is deceiving himself thinking that he is right.
In this world, a lie usually succeeds. For this reason, he needs great strengthening, and to tell them, “I am walking on the path of truth, and now I want to hear no criticism. If there is truth in your words, I ask that you will come to me with your complaints, to show me the truth, when I decide it is time for criticism. Only at that time will I be willing to listen to your views.”
It therefore follows that in order for one to have joy in the work of the Creator, all he needs is faith. In other words, when he believes in the greatness of the Creator, he does not need the King to give him anything. Simply being able to speak to the King is all he wants, meaning to speak to the Creator, as mentioned in the third discernment of giving praise.
If he pays more attention to praising the King, then high inspiration will come to him by itself because he does not want anything from the King. This is similar to the Sefira Bina. It is known that at its end, Hochma does not wish to receive the light of Hochma, but Hochma wishes to bestow upon the Emanator as the Emanator bestows upon Hochma. And she wants equivalence of form.
In that state, the abundance, called “light of Hassadim,” after the Kli, comes by itself. This means that the receiver wishes to engage in Hesed [grace/mercy], hence the abundance is called “light of Hassadim” [plural of Hesed]. It is similar here. When a person wants nothing of the King except to bestow upon the King and pays attention to what He thinks, an inspiration from above comes upon him by itself when he engages in singing and praising of the King, to the extent that he has prepared himself.
Now we can understand the matter of Moses and Israel singing and praising the King for the queen, and not the queen herself. It is known that everything we say about the upper worlds is only in relation to the souls, that Malchut is called “the collective soul of Israel” or “the assembly of Israel.” It is explained in The Study of the Ten Sefirot (Part 16), that the soul of Adam HaRishon came out from the interior of the worlds Beria, Yetzira, and Assiya, from which he received Nefesh, Ruach, Neshama. And they all came out from Malchut de [of] Atzilut, called Shechina [Divinity]. And Zeir Anpin, who gives to the Malchut, is called “King.”
Since Malchut is the receiver for the souls, it follows that Malchut cannot receive abundance for the people of Israel because they are still unfit—having no vessels of bestowal. Otherwise, it will all go to the Sitra Achra [other side], who are called “dead,” since there is reception in order to receive in them, which is called “separation and remoteness from the Creator,” who is called “the Life of Lives.” This is why they are called “dead.”
In The Zohar, it is considered that a person must be concerned about the sorrow of the Shechina, meaning sorrow at not being able to receive abundance for her children, who are the people of Israel. She is called “the assembly of Israel” because she assembles within her the abundance that she should give to Israel. Therefore, when the people of Israel engage in equivalence of form, there is room for Malchut to receive the upper abundance from the King, who is called “the Giver,” ZA, so as to give to the people of Israel.
This is called “Malchut, who is called ‘the Queen,’ praising the King for the abundance she has received from Him.” Likewise, when she cannot receive abundance for Israel from the King, it is called “the sorrow of the Shechina.” And when she can receive abundance, she is called “The mother of the sons is happy,” and she praises the King.
Yet, all the sorrow and joy relate only to the whole of Israel. This is why The Zohar says that Moses and Israel say the song, meaning praise the king for the queen. It means that the reason why Moses and Israel praise the king is for the queen, which means that they have established themselves to praise the King, since what the King was to give to Moses and Israel was not for themselves, but for Malchut. In other words, they cannot tolerate the sorrow of the Shechina, which is why they engage in equivalence of form, so that Malchut can bestow. This is why it says, “Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.
M. Laitman: (01:01:06) Thank you, Moshe. Well, it is such an article that there is really nothing to add. Okay. What do we do next?
Reader: According to the order, we need to read another article by Baal HaSulam, “The Love of God and the Love of Man.”
M. Laitman: Well, let's read it. Who do you suggest? I can't tell you to keep reading now. No, no.
Reader: Okay, I can say that I will continue reading.
M. Laitman: No, I mean, who wants to read? Who wants to read? You, you do? You know Hebrew? Well, go ahead and read. Let him read. 482. “The Love of God and the Love of Man.”
The transcript has been transcribed and edited from English simultaneous interpretation, thus there may be potential semantic inaccuracies within it.
Daily Lesson (Morning) April 30, 2024.
Part 2: Baal HaSulam. The Love of God and the Love of Man
Reading Article: (01:03:01) “The Love of God and the Love of Man”
“‘Love your friend as yourself,’ Rabbi Akiva says this is a great rule in the Torah” (Beresheet Rabbah 24).
Reader: (01:03:18) “Collective and Individual.”
The above statement—although it is one of the most famous and cited sayings—is still unexplained to everyone with all its vastness. This is so because the word Klal [rule/or collective] indicates a sum of details that relates to the above collective, where each and every detail carries a part within it in a way that the gathering of all the details together creates that collective.
If we say “a great Klal in the Torah,” it means that all the texts and the 612 Mitzvot [commandments] are the sum total of the details that relate to the verse, “Love your friend as yourself.” Seemingly it is difficult to understand how such a statement can contain the sum-total of all the Mitzvot in the Torah. At most, it can be a Klal for the part of the Torah and sentences that relate to the Mitzvot between man and man. But how can you include the greater part of the Torah, which concerns work between man and the Creator in the verse, “Love your friend as yourself”?
M. Laitman: Take the mic and continue, let's see how you will do.
Reader: (01:05:30) “That which You Hate, Do Not Do to Your Friend.”
If we can somehow reconcile the above words, there come the words of Old Hillel to that foreigner who came to him and asked him to convert him, as it says in the Gemara, “Convert me so that you will teach me the whole Torah while I am standing on one leg.” He told him, “That which you hate, do not do to your friend. This is the whole Torah, and the rest is its commentary, go study.” We see that he told him that the whole Torah is the interpretation of the verse, “Love your friend as yourself.”
Now, according to the words of Hillel—the teacher of all the Tannaim [sages during the early CE centuries], and by whom laws are interpreted—it is perfectly clear to us that the primary purpose of our holy Torah is to bring us to that sublime degree where we can observe this verse, “Love your friend as yourself,” for he says explicitly, “The rest is its commentary, go study.” That is, they interpret for us how to come to that rule.
It is surprising that such a statement can be correct in most issues of the Torah, which concern judgments between man and the Creator, when every beginner evidently knows that this is the heart of the Torah and not the interpretation concerning the verse, “Love your friend as yourself.”
M. Laitman: Okay, who else can read? You? Well, let's see it.
Reader: Love your friend as yourself.
M. Laitman: But not from the beginning.
Reader: No, it's the next part.
Reading Article: (01:07:50) “Love Your Friend as Yourself.”
We should also examine and understand the meaning of the verse itself when he says, “Love your friend as yourself.” The literal meaning of it is to love your friend to the same extent that you love yourself. However, we see that the public cannot be like that at all. If it had said, “Love your friend as much as your friend loves you,” there would still not be many who could fully observe it, yet it would be acceptable.
But to love my friend as much as I love myself seems impossible. Even if there were but one person in the world besides me, it would still be impossible, much less when the world is full of people. Moreover, if one loved everyone as much as one loves oneself, he would have no time for himself, for it is certain that one satisfies one’s own needs without neglect, and with great passion, for one loves oneself.
It is not so concerning the needs of the collective: He has no strong reason to stimulate his desire to work for them. Even if he had a desire, could he still keep this statement literally? Would his strength endure? If not, how can the Torah obligate us to do something that is not in any way achievable?
M. Laitman: Okay, who else wants to try? Please.
Reader: (01:09:50) We should not imagine that this verse was said as an exaggeration, for we are warned and insist on “You will neither add nor take away from it.” All the interpreters agreed to interpret the text literally. Moreover, they said that one must satisfy the needs of one’s friend even in a place where one is himself deficient. Even then he must satisfy the needs of his friend and leave himself deficient.
The Tosfot interpret Kidushin 20, “One who buys a Hebrew slave, it is as though he buys a master for himself.” The Tosfot interpret there in the name of the Jerusalem [Talmud] that “Sometimes he has but one pillow. If he lies on it himself, he does not observe, ‘For he is happy with you.’ If he does not lie on it and does not give it to his slave, it is sodomite rule. It turns out that against his will he must give it to his servant. Thus, he has bought himself a master.”
M. Laitman: Okay, well, who else wants to try? You? Well.
Reader: (01:11:20) “One Mitzva [Commandment].”
This raises several questions: According to the aforesaid, we all sin against the Torah. Moreover, we do not observe even the primary part of the Torah, since we observe the details but not the actual rule. It is written: “When you observe the will of the Creator, the poor are in others and not in you,” for how can there be poor when everyone does what the Creator wants and loves their friends as themselves?
The issue of the Hebrew slave that the Jerusalem [Talmud] presents needs further study: The meaning of the text is that even if the foreigner is not Hebrew, he must love him like himself. And how could one explain that the rule for the foreigner is the same as that of the Hebrew, since “One law and one ordinance should be both for you and for the stranger who dwells with you.” The word Ger [proselyte/foreigner] also means a “residing proselyte,” meaning one who does not accept the Torah, except for retiring from idolatry. It is written about such a person: “You may give it to the stranger who is within your gates.”
M. Laitman: Okay, who can continue?
Reader: (01:13:19) This is the meaning of one Mitzva that the Tanna speaks of when he says, “Performing one Mitzva sentences oneself and the entire world to the side of merit.” It is very difficult to understand what the entire world has to do with this. We should not force an explanation that it is when one is half unworthy and half worthy, and the whole world is half unworthy and half worthy, for if we say so, we are missing the whole point.
Moreover, the whole world is full of gentiles and tyrants, so how can he see that they are half unworthy and half worthy? He can see about himself that he is half unworthy and half worthy, but not that the entire world is such. Furthermore, the text should have at least stated “The whole of Israel.” Why did the Tanna add the entire world here? Are we guarantors for the nations of the world, to add them to our account of good deeds?
We must understand that our sages spoke only of the practical part of the Torah, which brings the world and the Torah to the desired goal. Therefore, when they say one Mitzva, they certainly mean a practical Mitzva. This is certainly as Hillel says, meaning “Love your friend as yourself.” It is by this Mitzva alone that one attains the real goal, which is Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator. Thus, you find that with this one Mitzva, one observes the entire goal and purpose.
Now there is no question about the Mitzvot between man and the Creator because the practical ones among them have the same purpose of cleansing the body, the last point of which is to love your friend as yourself, after which immediately comes the Dvekut.
There is a general and a particular in this. We come from the particular to the general, for the general leads to the ultimate goal. Thus, it certainly makes no difference from which side to begin, from the particular or from the general, as long as we begin and not stay neutral until we reach our goal.
M. Laitman: Okay. Yes, you wanted it to also? Well, let's let him read.
Reader: (01:16:09) “And to Adhere to Him.”
There still remains room to ask, “If the whole purpose of the Torah and all of creation is but to raise the base humanity to become worthy of that wonderful sublimity, and to adhere to Him, He should have created us with that sublimity to begin with instead of troubling us with the labor of creation, and the Torah and Mitzvot.
We could explain this with the words of our sages: “One who eats that which is not his is afraid to look at his face.” This means that anyone who feeds on the labor of others is afraid (ashamed) to look at his own form, for his form is inhuman.
Because no deficiency comes from His wholeness, He has prepared for us this work, so we may enjoy the labor of our own hands. This is why He created creation in this base form. The work in Torah and Mitzvot lifts us from the baseness of creation, and through it we achieve our sublimity by ourselves. Then we do not feel the delight and pleasure that comes to us from his generous hand as a gift, but as the owners of that pleasure.
However, we must still understand the source of the baseness that we feel upon receiving a gift. Nature scientists know that the nature of every branch is close to its root. The branch loves all the conducts in the root, wants them, covets them, and derives benefit from them. Conversely, the branch stays away from everything that is not in the root; it cannot tolerate them and is harmed by them.
Because our root is the Creator, Who does not receive but bestows, we feel sorrow and degradation upon every reception from another.
Now we understand the purpose of adhering to Him. The sublimity of Dvekut [adhesion] is only the equivalence of the branch with its root. On the other hand, the whole matter of baseness is only the remoteness from the root. In other words, each being whose ways are corrected to bestow upon others rises and becomes capable of adhering to Him, and every being whose way is reception and self-love is degraded and removed far from the Creator.
M. Laitman: (01:20:02) Okay. What? What do you want? You also want to read? You're the guard. No. Okay, what should we do according to the order?
Reader: We can let the friends ask questions, and these are the two articles we had for the day.
M. Laitman: Okay, so questions. First of all, if there are any to me, right? Okay.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:20:41) Yes. Can we understand what Baal HaSulam is trying to explain? He says that in the whole Torah there is one central commandment, which is to love your friend as yourself. But then he explains that it's impossible. And I can admit that the Torah speaks about something that is impossible.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: What's the answer to that?
M. Laitman: The answer is that it's possible if we do exactly according to what the Torah demands of us.
Student: Which is?
M. Laitman: Which is to be in a society that will be able to learn from society, and strengthen from society, and keep this law in the society.
Student: It's written here in my book, probably from a previous lesson, that it's something that a person cannot do except with the help of the Creator.
M. Laitman: Correct.
Student: So that confuses me, because it's a commandment, and we say a commandment is something that a person has to do, a correction that a person has to do.
M. Laitman: But the fact that he can't do it on his own, that's clear. A person can't do any commandment on his own.
Student: I'm trying to translate it. If we want to explain it, it's something that we want to explain, to say, okay, so if we want to have a good life, according to the Torah, we have one central commandment, which is to love your friend as yourself. But we can't reach it. We can't come to it. We have to ask the Upper Force to bring us to it, right?
M. Laitman: That's how it is with all the commandments. That's how it is with all the commandments because the commandments are actions to bestow. And really, in order to bestow, we can't do it. So, we can turn to the Creator to help us. And then we get a force from the Creator, and then we can.
Student: Basically, the commandments are what directs us toward what we have to ask of the Creator? Can you put it this way?
M. Laitman: No, the commandments are what we must do according to the commands of the Creator. So, the sons of Israel will return to their Lord.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:23:28) I immediately wrote these words because it's clear to us that a person can't do any commandment on his own. And I'd like to ask in the name of new students, because when we explain Torah and commandments to beginner students, it always awakens questions with respect to where they come from. So, how can we explain to a person who is beginning to learn the concept of commandment in a way that they will digest it?
M. Laitman: I'll tell you. We really can't perform any commandment on our own, but only if we get a correction to begin with, that we can direct it towards the Creator. Meaning, that we can do it in order to bestow. That’s it. We have to learn how to bring ourselves to a clarification and a deed that we do in order to bestow to the Creator only. And then we get forces.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:25:12) The previous article we read by Rabash, its name is “One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future.” What does that mean?
M. Laitman: As much as a person believes in his future, that he's going to go and correct himself in order to equalize himself to the Creator, so his future is close to that faith and that deed.
Student: What confidence does a person have with regard to the future?
M. Laitman: The Creator promises.
Student: A person has to tell himself he will receive something in the future and believe it?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: Why is this not fake?
M. Laitman: Because he's doing as much as he can in that direction. He turns to the Creator with all the forces that he can accumulate in order to bestow and he performs the commandment.
Student: What satisfies him, what fills him now, what he's destined to receive in the future?
M. Laitman: Yes, surrounding lights.
Student: Okay.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:26:37) I also wanted to ask about the article by Rabash that we read. It follows from the article that a person attains only greatness, only the greatness of the matter. So, where is the vessel that changes if all you attain is either the greatness of the giver or?
M. Laitman: Who attains? Man, upon what? Upon attaining how opposite he is.
Student: The vessel always remains empty. He also writes that if he were to fill up my vessel, it would not be regarded as bestowal.
M. Laitman: That's correct, but compared to that vessel, he attains his degrees.
Student: What exactly do you attain? Because if the vessel remains empty, then where is... How do you measure a person's bestowal?
M. Laitman: A person's bestowal is measured according to his adhesion in the Creator.
Student: The adhesion, the level of greatness of the Creator that he has, is that the level of his adhesion?
M. Laitman: The measure of the greatness of the Creator in the eyes of man, that's the measure of adhesion.
Student: The greatness of the Giver, is that the vessel?
M. Laitman: The greatness of the Creator in the eyes of man, that is the vessel.
Student: What changes in us all the time? As we go toward bestowal, what…?
M. Laitman: The greatness of the Creator constantly increases. The greatness of the Creator constantly increases in us.
Student: The fact that we have greatness, is this already regarded as having a filling? That's the filling we have to aspire for?
M. Laitman: Yes, the feeling of the greatness of the Creator in us, that's our fulfillment.
Student: Clear.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:29:00) Is the greatness of the Creator that a person attains, does it nourish his soul? Or does he have to get something additional for his soul?
M. Laitman: No, that's enough for everything.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:29:20) Also from the previous article: Speaking to the King, or with the King, is this inner light?
M. Laitman: I don't know.
Student: What does it mean to speak with the King?
M. Laitman: To speak to the King is to turn to the King from the state you're in.
Student: For the future to become present?
M. Laitman: It could be.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:29:57) Desires that awaken in me, can I connect each desire to some commandment? What are commandments?
M. Laitman: The desires that awaken in you, can you connect them to a commandment? Well, in according to what you reveal and feel.
Student: Because we say that every desire is in order to turn to be for the sake of the Creator. So, any desire has to be connected to some commandment.
M. Laitman: It's connected to the commandments if you invert it in order to bestow to the Creator.
Student: Every single desire that comes is a commandment?
M. Laitman: That you invert, yes.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:30:50) I want to continue the friend's scrutiny. He's speaking about our connection with the Creator, changing our relation to the Giver of the gift rather than the gift. He tells us that here there's the internality of the Creator and his externality. If we come to a state where we're constantly in the internality of the Creator, in constant gratitude, that's the greatest state there is?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: Can we be in gratitude all the time? Because we know we also have to ask of the Creator for the states when we ask Him for help. So, how can we be in gratitude without asking?
M. Laitman: No, you need both.
Student: It's both. It's not only gratitude and gratitude.
M. Laitman: Just like in the prayer.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:31:44) At the end of the article he says that the condition for the correct request is not to ask for himself but for the Shechina, for divinity, to feel the sorrow of the Shechina. And his request should come from there.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: What does it mean to feel the sorrow of the Shechina?
M. Laitman: To feel the sorrow of the Shechina? As much as the Shechina isn't getting filled with the lights that she wants to pass to the lower ones, because the lower ones aren't interested or don't want to receive her lights for now. So, she's sorry about it. Like a woman who has milk, but the baby is sick and doesn't want to eat.
Student: Is it something we should depict or feel? Or how do we touch the sorrow of the Shechina?
M. Laitman: So, you pray and you ask and also in the public and also for the Shechina that they will receive one another in a way that something from the Shechina that the public will want to receive.
Student: Can we search for it in the Ten, or in the suffering of humanity, or where?
M. Laitman: In the Ten and more than the Ten until you get to the whole world.
Student: To begin in the Ten?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: That there we want to build a vessel that will feel the sorrow?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: There are two things we need to depict. The greatness of the Giver, right? And the sorrow of the Shechina that cannot give because we basically are blocking it.
M. Laitman: Yes, of course. That's it? Yes?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:34:03) When the connection with the Creator, the first light shows you your own corruption. Discover this will to receive. It's not always easy to bear it when you find the evil in you. And then it tells you to depict the pleasure that there is in bestowal. How in that state, what does it mean to depict the pleasure in bestowal?
M. Laitman: By the Upper One giving to the lower one and the lower one being able to receive it and to receive it in order to bestow to the Upper One, so then between them there's such a connection that there's nothing beyond that.
Student: It's very difficult to see it at the moment when the evil is revealed in a person. He feels his own baseness, his own lowliness.
M. Laitman: Who feels his own lowliness?
Student: When it shines and you see your own evil and the corruption.
M. Laitman: Oh, that's what you see.
Student: It's a very intense pain.
M. Laitman: Right.
Student: And from there you have to imagine with the Creator that it's actually Him shining for you. So first of all, you have to be in gratitude in that state and also depict the pleasure and delight of bestowal, which is almost impossible at that moment.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, how do you do it?
M. Laitman: You have to work on it. There's nothing you can do. You have to work on it and then you'll find it. The keys are in our hands.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:36:00) The title of the article is, “One's Greatness Depends on the Measure of One's Faith in the Future.” He also says, “then Moses will sing.” It follows that the measure of a person's greatness, the greatness of the Creator in the eyes of a person, allows him to work without reward, that only the connection is the reward.
M. Laitman: That is a reward.
Student: It sounds like it's only to bestow in order to bestow. Can that be?
M. Laitman: No.
Student: What is the vessel where the sorrow of the Shechina and the Shechina is the one that can receive the abundance?
M. Laitman: That's the same will to receive that the Creator created and it exists in all the created beings.
Student: Is that the real vessel that brings contentment to the Creator?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: Only at the end of correction can a person receive that vessel?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: When a Kabbalist attains in the present, does he really, is he already connected to the correction of the general public and with that he works?
M. Laitman: No, no, no. I can't say about that.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:37:20) Also concerning the article, he writes that a person should sustain his soul so he will have the strength so he has to depict a measure of delight and pleasure and joy he will receive. Is this not the same as asking or thinking about a reward he will receive in the next world?
M. Laitman: I don't understand.
Student: In order to sustain his soul, a person has to depict to himself when he doesn't have the fuel, so he needs to depict what he will get in the future. So, is it not the same as a person expecting a reward in the next world?
M. Laitman: He's expecting a reward in the next world.
Student: In other words, to sustain us in states where we have no fuel, is it appropriate to use the shells?
M. Laitman: No.
Student: Why are we always talking about reward in the next world? That it's not the main, the essence of the fear, not the right way to bestow upon the Creator?
M. Laitman: Reward for the next world is that we will have an ability to bestow to the Creator.
Student: I understand. Maybe another question. We have this matter of observing the commandments as 613 counsels, tips. When a person observes in this way, does it mean that he observes in order to bestow already or not?
M. Laitman: That's called that he's preparing himself to receive in order to bestow. He's preparing himself, it's a preparation.
Student: To receive in order to bestow?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: Is he already bestowing in order to bestow?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: Can I ask another one? I'm worried, let's say if someone asks me, because we learned that the whole Torah is around the commandment of loving your friend as yourself, between man and man. If I'm asked the commandment of where I'm feeling, how is this between a person and his friend? How can we explain those commandments that we cannot understand? Even spiritually, I can't understand what it means that it has to be carried out between a person and his friend.
M. Laitman: I don't know. How do you depict commandments between man and a friend?
Student: That's a question I ended up asking. I probably don't even understand what the commandments between a person and his friend are. I can't describe it correctly.
M. Laitman: That probably when you're performing the commands of the Creator, you're doing it for the others.
Student: Thank you very much.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:40:56) He writes to love your friend as yourself where the immediate stage that follows it is adhesion in love of man and the love of God. So, what is the connection between love between the friends and loving the Creator? Even before that, he writes there is no question about the commandments between man and the Creator because the practicality in them also has that purpose of refining the body, whose final point is to love your friend as yourself, whose immediate stage that follows is adhesion. So, what is the refining of the body in the work between the friends?
M. Laitman: The purity of a person's desire from the intention to receive.
Student: And then there's no difference between work between the friends and work toward the Creator?
M. Laitman: Right.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:42:01) I'm trying to understand how to weigh my desires. With respect to what? Because all kinds of desires surface on all kinds of levels. So, how do I weigh them? With respect to what so it'll be for the benefit of the general public. Or is this even the right direction?
M. Laitman: Did everybody hear what he was asking? Do you have an answer?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:42:42) A person needs to incorporate himself with the general public in advance.
M. Laitman: Does that satisfy you?
Student: So, I weigh the desires emerging in me? That which gives more strength to what? To our group? What desire do I take? I can take all kinds of corporeal desires and seemingly turn them in order to bestow.
M. Laitman: What would you say?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:43:26) Everything a person does when he organizes his desires, he has to take into consideration that it influences the public. He's part of the public.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: That's it. I still don't understand with respect to what is the calculation?
M. Laitman: The calculation is in respect to the collective. To the collective. As much as the collective receives a fulfillment from that calculation, so by that fulfillment, it can be fulfilled.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:44:14) He also continues it in the previous article where Rabash brought in a clear commandment that all the effort and all purpose is to come to connection with the Creator. And he ends that that connection with the Creator is only by a person feeling for the sorrow of the Shechina.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, it's the same as our desires having to be connected to the general public. So, the purpose of our connection with the Creator is only to the extent that a person is in a state of being sorry for the Shechina, that he is in such a prayer?
M. Laitman: That's the purpose of the connection?
Student: I'm asking if by this a person attains a connection with the Creator, only when he is sorry for the sorrow of the Shechina?
M. Laitman: No, sorrow of the Shechina is not the purpose.
Student: It's not the purpose, but the purpose is to adhere to it, to connect to Him, to connect with the Creator, which is obtained only by a person being sorry for the Shechina, that he is in such a state.
M. Laitman: I guess I don't understand him.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:45:51) I want to continue the question that a friend began. Let's say a person decides to put to work feeling, or to, say, grace for the food or something. Should he think that now, by this, he's contributing to the Ten, to the friends, to the public, that by this he's doing something that contributes?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, it's not even a thought of himself?
M. Laitman: If he wants it to be. So, obviously, that's the way his thought should be.
Student: And this turns all the commandments, it doesn't matter if you do them physically or what, you turn them into a commandment between a person and his friend?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, the intention is between a person and his friend?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: What about a person's relationship or thoughts about the Creator?
M. Laitman: Could be. It depends on the commandment.
Student: I'm deliberately using the same example that a friend gave: A person doesn't know if a person wears Tefillin.
M. Laitman: Still, it can also be a commandment between a person and the Creator, because it comes from the Creator.
Student: But when we say, going back to the question, when we say it's all love your friend as yourself.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, here, is it really for the friends, or can you also perceive the Creator as a friend? I don't know. How is this included in loving your friend as yourself?
M. Laitman: How are all the commandments incorporated in love your friend as yourself?
Student: Yes.
M. Laitman: Because the Creator's in that, too.
Student: There are two aspects here. He does something, and he wants a reward to go to all of humanity, or to the Ten, outside of himself, and also to the Creator?
M. Laitman: Yes. Yes. He annuls that difference between the friends, and between the Creator, and between everybody. But it's just in order to bestow from the entire vessel of the soul.
Student: Can it be said that he's aiming to anything outside of himself?
M. Laitman: Right.
Student: Thank you.
M. Laitman: Okay. Guys, enough. Enough. That's it. I, half an hour from now, or an hour, I don't know, I'm leaving here, and I'll be back in a week. That's it. That's what I wanted to say. So, I hope that during that time, you all take a jump. A jump ahead on the path.
Student: Friends, you're going to ask questions, so I just want to put some water here. The morning lessons are to be conducted as usual. Instead of articles, we'll keep studying.
M. Laitman: And the time will be the same time, the lessons?
Student: Yes, the same order, and in the last part of the lesson, if there's no complete lesson, there will be social time, and Neve Navon will be in charge of the lessons. Moshe Admoni will be leading the social time. Moshe Admoni is also managing the content of the upcoming congress, and the noon lessons will be recorded lessons.
M. Laitman: Yes, exactly. All right.
Reader: So, let's move on to the next part of the lesson, and before that, we'll sing a song together.
Song: (01:50:13)