Morning Lesson November 27, 2020 Transcription is made from simultaneous translation which leaves possibility for errors

Connecting the World in the Last Generation, #25

Reader Excerpt 25 (00:01 - 00:37)

80. R. We have seen in our history also in Russia and North Korea, North Vietnam, China, Eastern Europe... We saw how they wanted to build all kinds of systems or relationships between people that will be in order to bestow, socialist, and how they never succeeded. Also, in countries that used to be capitalist and flipped or like the United States somewhat, you see that they want to reach some kind of a unique social level. But it never works. Because we don't have a foundation to determine what equality is between everybody. We learn about equality, how to measure it, how to determine it, how to give everyone, after we build it, a satisfaction that they won't want to throw off the balance of equality. So, it's a very big problem in human society. We are not speaking, even about spiritual attainment, but just how to take a corporeal person in this world and build such a system between everybody that everybody will be satisfied and it can be equally between everybody without oppressing one another. But with our egoistic will to receive each one feels special and unique and wants to control everybody. So how can it be that we will agree and understand, and determine a form of equality between everybody? It is supposedly impossible. So, what does he say?

Reader continues “From a dry lifeless principal....”(02:45 - 03:31)

81. R. If we reach a state that each one will receive equally towards the others, by this we take out of a person all of the motive, all of the reason to work, to be excellent in something, to reach something, but whoever will have it will just have it because his will to receive thinks so well I'll get it anyways why should I give any exertion or anything. By this, we just finish off our society as we saw in Russia and Eastern Europe, North Korea and other places. This is why we have no choice but to stop trying with our own forces that our corporeal reality, in this world, to try to build a society that we will be social and cooperative that each one will give everything you can for society and only use what he needs equally with everyone. That can’t be, there is no chance for that to succeed and exist.

82. S. (04:56) On the one hand, there is nothing clearer than this. On the other hand, we see how entire nations are confused with that, to this day, and they believe that they can carry out this socialistic idea on their own that there is this... deafness.

R. It's not deafness because the goal is nice and good and correct and we understand it in our mind but that should be, that everybody should be equal, and everybody should receive what they need and that everybody should give what they can to society and by that, everything will be peaceful. This final condition, state, is clear but what does he write here about, that we don't have the forces in our mind in our world in our nature, a way to keep it, to have it to exist because the will to receive is the foundation of our nature. This is why we will never be able to implement it.

S. This is where the other side of the question comes which is, how did the Creator take this hidden principle from them that it needs to be for the Creator and only that disappeared from that and because of that everything is ruined. Everything is okay except for one hidden principal so the Creator kind of needs to help here because they're going for a good goal so to speak why doesn't nature help here?

R. That is the whole point, if it's not for the Creator, not just to be idealists, not just to be religious or fanatics, if you don't work in faith above reason you cannot keep the spiritual law, you can't. Only under the condition that you are doing this action yourself or under the condition that you are integrating with people who are doing it and annulling towards them, one of the two.

S. Why does the absurd situation where the Creator pushes away those who aim for equality, the values that are similar to Him, so to speak, so now no one believes anything that has to do with these goals in these values.

R. That is in order to recognize the evil for really to be in order to bestow, otherwise it can't happen. It can’t. Humanity had to go through all of these states. As a student I used to live in Leningrad where the revolution took place. There was an old Jewish woman that I was renting a place from and she was one of those that organized that revolution. She used to tell me with burning eyes how she was already 90 years old and how we did it and what we worked for and what we didn't do. She used to say how she used to give out bread, you know little rolls, to every soldier who used to go on the train in order to go to the war. She stood in the train station and she used to help. She said from morning to night I was out there giving out those bread rolls to each and every one and I didn't even have a thought that I could take one and eat it even though I gave it out to everybody without any calculation. But for me to take it for myself I was trembling from hunger and I was freezing but no, nothing, people were devoted. This is an order for us to understand that it is if it is not for the Creator, but who is the Creator? The Creator is pure bestowal. Not from the human ego, not from his desire, not from him convincing himself and according to his desire he wants to do it. It has to be above his degree, above his desire, in faith above reason it has to take place, this is the difference. Here is the principle that if you don't do this above your nature towards the Creator's nature, so it won't be a pure action and it won't succeed. So how could she give out those bread rolls? She was convinced that it was good and nice and worth it so she was so convinced that she didn't take anything for herself. Just like that. I remember, I remember her, she used to tell me this story, how her face lit up and how her eyes were just shining like she felt she was a young girl again giving out that bread. It can't take place from our ego, from our nature, but even though our nature, even though our ego, above it. Only in such a way because then you are really doing a correct action of bestowal, only then do you understand the Creator that He is in such a will to bestow. For me in order to get there I have to overcome my will to receive and then I raise myself to the will to bestow, no. Then you understand what form He is in and then you can do it otherwise but only to build the will to receive and disconnect from it, above it and then you can reach, specifically then when you have those two desires, one and two and you raise one towards the other, then you can truly reach the understanding what it is to be in that special nature that you are free. You are not connected to anything, you are truly in that vacant space. We need to get there and understand it.

83. S. (12:46) About the matter of equality, all of the wars that existed in the world were about equality and justice and all of the wars between the genders are about equality but when we actually want to talk about what makes us equal, everyone gets confused. How do you demonstrate equality, what does it mean to be equal?

R. We can determine equality between us but only if each one is in the full measure of bestowal, then as much as he gives and each one according to his own abilities, this is called equality. I gave 10 kilos of effort and you give a hundred kilos of effort but we are equal because I gave everything I could and you gave everything you could. Then we don't have a complaint towards one another because we didn't create ourselves in such a way.

84. S. (14:12) To continue the scrutiny, it turns out that success can only come if a person or a society doesn't want to be socialistic in their desire, but they force themselves and because of this ideal and only then did they reach this overcoming, this is one of the conditions?

R. That’s one of the conditions, you are right. This is why from capitalism, from egoism, from all of these tendencies we need to reach recognition of evil and through the recognition of evil to the true socialism.

S. Another issue seems like it is the same process that we need to come from Lo Lishma to Lishma. It looks like everything that we have done was Lo Lishma but it also influences our work, what is the factor that will ultimately transition from Lo Lishma to Lishma? We have to start from Lo Lishma as we learn. How are we supposed to move to the next stage?

R. To go to the next stage they have to connect to those people that were in Lishma and to try as much as possible to serve them, to help them, to be with them, to connect to them, to support them. This is called to take them on their shoulders and to climb the mountain of bestowal, all the ladder of degrees is called the mountain of the Creator. In that way everyone will be corrected.

85. S. (16:12) You said we lack a common foundation for the whole world to discover equality. What is the best way to depict this level of foundation for the world to understand what we need in order to reach the degree of love of others?

R. The more it is possible to reach faith above reason then we will understand what the Creator is asking of us, what form of bestowal does he want people to have and then around that same group that reaches in order to bestow, to the complete bestowal, the whole world can connect to it.

86. S. (17:04) In the last generation we will work according to Lishma. What is the difference between that and the lady that handed out the bread rolls?

R. It was built on her ego. That is why all of those actions later on became the complete egoist actions and terror started, terrorism and people when hungry and the communist, there was no such thing in any country that they did. To this day we still feel it and can't get out of it.

S. Lishma is a state that is promised without any bad implications only society needs to come to that and that will be the final correction.

R. Society needs to see an ideal in a group working in such a way, in order to bestow and that group has to scatter and disseminate everything around it correctly and then it will happen.

87. S. (19:01) In our Latin countries there seems to be a soft spot for socialism and communism and many friends support these movements that are rising in our regions. Should we do as Bnei Baruch, efforts to try and clarify for our Latin friends not realizing that these movements lack recognition of evil, or should we just let it happen by itself?

R. No, let it happen on its own, we shouldn't talk about it because we can criticize all of these things gradually. From what we will do we will learn and do it and they will understand all of the movements are egoistic in their foundations. It is hard but they will understand it later on, don't try to speed it up or tell them anything.

88. S. (20:07) Once again I want to relate to the example of the woman. How can we explain to people that our ideas are different from communist ideas?...

R. First of all, we don't need to explain to people what faith above reason is. We shouldn't, we're not allowed to, they won't understand it and they will think that we are not normal, not realistic, not standing on the ground. On the contrary, we need to speak about the will to receive, that we do understand that our matter is the will to receive and that we have a method of how to organize our life correctly and equally for people that are in the will to receive and above the will to receive, that they can rise. Actually we are not speaking about faith above reason with any stranger, only within us, only those who are studying these lessons with us every morning, only between us can we talk about this. If you speak about this with strangers, you will ruin them, they will think you are insane. That is why we are not allowed to do it, our dissemination has to be only that we are drawing people to bestow, to love, to connection, and to know what spirituality is, what a spiritual system is, but not faith above reason. It is a technique, it is a practical technique that we cannot reveal, not that we don't want to, we can't reveal it to people who aren't with us in our study group.

S. How do you explain the difference between what we explain about bestowal and communist ideas? How do you separate the difference?

R. I think even that is not worth it, what we usually explain in dissemination, I don't have time to start with this now but we'll have another lesson about that, what it means, what we are disseminating, what connection between us is, bestowing. All in all we are speaking about connection, this is what the world is lacking because the whole world is being revealed as an integral world, except for humans, which is why we are in such a collision with nature, the still vegetative an animal and an inner collision between us which is the problem. This is what we have to explain and we will talk about it, not today.

89. S. (24:06) What name can we give this method, there are two options, integral education which seems that we are teaching something people don't know before or integral communication which is somewhat understandable to most people, what do you suggest?

R. Integral communication sounds good if you use that that would be better.

https://kabbalahmedia.info/en/lessons/cu/nKyRpdk7?language=en&mediaType=video

Каббала Медиа

Каббала Медиа

Мой архивВойдите, чтобы ставить лайки, сохранять и подписываться на видео

Ежедневный урокFeb 3, 2005Бааль Сулам. Шамати 96. Что означают "отходы гумна и винодельни" в работе

Бааль Сулам. Шамати 96. Что означают "отходы гумна и винодельни" в работе

Бааль Сулам. Шамати 96. Что означают "отходы гумна и винодельни" в работе

Каббала МедиаCopyright © 2003-2026 Бней Барух – Ассоциация "Каббала Ла-Ам", Все права защищены

Мой архив
Войдите, чтобы ставить лайки, сохранять и подписываться на видео

Ежедневный урокFeb 3, 2005
Бааль Сулам. Шамати 96. Что означают "отходы гумна и винодельни" в работе

Каббала Медиа
Copyright © 2003-2026 Бней Барух – Ассоциация "Каббала Ла-Ам", Все права защищены