Series of lessons on the topic: Baal HaSulam - undefined

04 - 14 mayo 2025

Lesson 1014 de may. de 2025

Baal HaSulam. The Arvut (Mutual Guarantee), item 29 (18.11.2003)

Lesson 10|14 de may. de 2025
To all the lessons of the collection: Baal HaSulam. The Arvut (Mutual Guarantee)

The transcript has been transcribed and edited from English simultaneous interpretation, thus there may be potential semantic inaccuracies within it.

Daily Lesson (Morning) May 14, 2025.

Part 1: Baal HaSulam. The Arvut (Mutual Guarantee), item 29 (18.11.2003)

Reader: Hello friends! In the first part of the lesson, today, we're going to continue to study from the Arvut article, Mutual Guarantee. We're going to watch a lesson from November 18, 2003; we are on Item 29 in the article. You'll find the article on the Kabbalahgroup.info and on the Arvut system. Let's study. 

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (00:34) Why does he say, tell them a kingdom of priests and no less? It also sounds like something impossible.

M. Laitman: Not more and not less actually means the attitude to the method. That no less, meaning what is a kingdom of priests? Not for oneself, right? A correction that it's not for myself. I am being cut off from personal involvement in anything I'll do, perform, whatever happens, my “I” doesn't exist. The “I” actually doesn't exist in reality but my concern is that reality will happen, not that I will be in it. This is called, the kingdom of priests. No less than this correction must be attained; no more refers to the manner of working with AHP. That you can take the AHP always in proportions, in the coarseness that's no greater. Meaning that it's always only for the purpose of adhesion in order to bestow. The difference between vessels of bestowal with no less and the vessels of no more, that's basically how we work with that – that's how he expresses it.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (02:28) He says here that as the amazing Maimonides wrote, that for women and children should not reveal to them the matter of pure servitude. On the other hand, he says that Moses gave this pure servitude, this kingdom of priests.

M. Laitman: What does it mean that for slaves, women, and children, the matter of clean servitude is not revealed? Meaning the person who is in various degrees of dependence on his will to receive – when his will to receive is not satisfied – will not be able to advance and will have to give his will to receive what it demands. So, he is called, a slave of his desire. So, on the level of slaves, there are slaves like that. It is a slavery without realizing that that he is a slave, slavery without understanding. 

And there are those who are weak. When they feel themselves already weak and small with respect to their will to receive, and they know that it controls both the mind and the heart. And, sometimes, there's the ability to know oneself from a side and see how much he is not capable. And sometimes just falls into a state of just doing and that's it, just like a little one has no head of his own. Women, means a state where they feel dependence, that there is a will to receive which is like a husband, which is the owner. What can you do? He is the owner and you feel the dependency; you feel the deficiency that he must be fulfilled. And it's fulfilled by this kind of a relation that—what can you do? You use it and live in it in such a way, otherwise you can't live. Looking for additional pleasures, how to fulfill them with some type of fashion or public opinion or something that the public has to be given some goals for life. To fill himself up a bit, to feel that he's alive. So, there needs to be some football or some other game in the world, in life, some changes need to happen. One time, the world takes this, the other one, the world takes on that and they need to feel alive. This is called their life, meaning the changes in the manners of pleasures. That's how our world works - you see, each time there's like, a new fashion or something is determined as, oh, that's new, that's important. One time it's Harry Potter, another time it's the Matrix, or some other thing. That gives a sense of life because, otherwise, what to live for? So, a person is built in such a way that he's looking for something new to enliven himself, and this is called “a woman.” Meaning she feels dependent and she moves towards that dependence because, otherwise, how will I exist? That means dependent on the man and wants the man, like we learn from the Gemara and also from TES. That the woman wants one line and dependence—prefers it over nine lines and freedom. So, if we have these kinds of dependence called “slaves,” “children,” and “women,” we can talk about this a lot also from the psychological perspective, how it manifests in our world socially. How this descended into matter and functions in matter. These are things we can see and we can talk about it and this is something that you could also speak about in lectures to the public, things they understand. Then from that, you could rise to the reasons, the higher spiritual roots; but, whatever happens, if a person is in that state and in these states he could be either understanding himself or not because just like a small baby or a little child, he doesn't understand his state. He can say, I'm little.” Why? Because he sees the grown-ups but what does it mean to actually be little? You have to grow and then research what it means to be little. So, a person from his degree cannot know about his degree, he can't encompass it because the reason for his degree and all the forces operating it come from a higher degree. And also, possibly not the adjacent higher degree but a degree where there's already Rosh, Toch, and Sof for his degree, you understand? So, you could have a baby or a two-year-old, three-year-old, four-year-old—these are all degrees but still not a degree from which he can recognize what is a baby or a little child. So, however it happens, for people who are immersed in self-love, who are practically governed by the will to receive—because they're governed by the will to receive and they're not free from it—in order to advance them, in order to move them from one degree to the next, one state to the next until they come out of it, until they grasp, acquire, the qualities of Bina, so they can inspect the will to receive and determine the attitude to it—at least somewhat independent of it. Until then, you have to relate to them in such a way that the will to receive will assist them, will want the advancement. Because, otherwise, how will they advance? Meaning that you have to give their will to receive, each time, adequate fulfillment, right? This is what our sages understand, and the Kabbalists who understand human nature, they recommend what to do about this. For the little ones, the servants, and the women, they explain to them in soft words. What does it mean, “soft”? That the will to receive feels that it's moving towards fulfillment, pleasures, what it thinks of as good right now. Why do we do this play, this falsehood, with these types of states? Because we know that by this, by luring them with fulfillments of today—such little gifts, what the will to receive wants right now. By that we grow the will to receive, and it evolves; as it evolves, it then comes to states where the part of Bina in it begins to grow. And Bina is called understanding, mind, inspection, criticism. Then, besides his Malchut, besides his desire, he also has the part of Bina. Then, in the relationship between them, and in the clash between them, he begins to understand his state, inspect his state, from the perspective of Bina, which is referred to as more objective, more independent of Malchut, independent of the will to receive. Then, he also replaces his fulfillments, he wants a different fulfillment. A child who's playing a game, by playing games, he comes to the understanding that he wants more than games, something more and more serious. Like we once said, that the little girl wants to play with a doll but she doesn't want to play with a real baby, even though he's real. Because, for her, the doll is suitable, that's the garment for her pleasure. For a mother, the doll is not good, she wants a living baby, and that's her game; everyone has theirs. We, as if, lie to the will to receive, to that will to receive and to the people who are with us in the first lecture or first year of their studies, in that respect, we're falsely saying that things will be good. Of course, it will be good, we're not lying about that. But the good will come to vessels that we grow and develop and not the vessels that they have now because the vessels that you have now, is what you're giving them now, it's some candy, some playing hide and seek, or a car, or something else, that's still good for them. So, give this to them now, give them these baits, so they can advance. And a person, who begins to understand that there is a matter of changing vessels here, along the process, which is something that doesn't happen in our world. It only happens if you advance in the spiritual path, then you change the vessels. What one thinks of now and understands and wants and his goal is now to receive and fulfill himself with, tomorrow it will be different. If one understands that, then he already plays with his will to receive, himself, so that it allows him to advance. From that you begin, by awakening a sense of shame towards society, how will I not come to study? How will I not be like everyone else? How will I not have some pride of doing something towards this society? You start there, and it's good to play with oneself that way. As written: envy, lust, and honor take the person out of this world. Meaning out of the present degree to a higher degree, otherwise, nothing will help him. Until you begin, slowly, and it doesn't depend on the person, it's already a phenomenon that is brought by the upper surrounding light where instead of receiving pleasures in vessels of envy, lust, and honor, you begin to receive pleasures, appreciate pleasures of my relation to the Creator. How am I towards Him, He towards me in equivalence of form? I want to be similar, I want to be close, and so on. So, a person begins to take on self, the honor in relation, in accordance with the honor of the Creator. Now, to us, that seems, today, like some abstract idea because we don't feel that it can clothe in matter and give practical fulfillment. Later, no, you see, you begin to see that this idea can fulfill me more than anything and you're willing to devote all of life to it and be solely devoted to it. This happens in a person bit by bit and then he truly changes vessels, changes fulfillment, and works with a different goal already, a different fulfillment. That means that the “women,” “children,” and “slaves” grow and then they hear the secret, they accept the secret bit by bit, until their knowledge grows and they accept this idea. It's a process, a process where, in that process, both man and his society exist. And also, man and his body, and he knows how to really use and conduct himself with his body and with his society, and yes and no, and he doesn't know. Meaning there are processes taking place here, the changes are fundamental changes with respect to Malchut, to the will to receive. Part of the path, a person goes through it without detaching himself from Malchut and another part of the path, he already knows about the Malchut in him and he inspects it sometimes - sometimes less, sometimes more - from the side of Bina, this point that he acquires which keeps growing and increasing. Until he actually controls Malchut from the perspective of advancing, the perspective of the goal, the perspective of Bina. Thus, he uses it or he doesn't use it, this is called, “you shall be a kingdom of priests” and then he uses it the way it needs to be used and this is called, “you will be a holy nation.” It's the whole process.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (18:47) We learned that this is a process, but Moses, when he comes to the people of Israel that are still in the vessels of reception. He comes and it doesn't give him this place of revealing the stony heart somewhere as a vessel of reception. How does it work, these conditions? 

M. Laitman: You're asking how Moses came to the people of Israel and gave them such conditions? Yes, as if what the Creator demands from the beginning to the end of the process. We learned that it needs to happen bit by bit, yes, so have mercy. How can you—it says, don't put an obstacle in front of a blind man—right? So how can the person take this? In the state of Mount Sinai, they're demanded to be one man and one heart, otherwise it will be their burial place. And the state of Mount Sinai, it's a state, it's not our state. The state of Mount Sinai means that you have now emerged from Egypt, from the will to receive. This escape, it's an escape by GAR of Hochma, that's how it happens, by the upper force, it's an awakening from above. Now, when you have an idea of what this is, you have to take upon yourselves the whole next state that you're about to enter. That's called, “kingdom of priests and holy nation,” that exiting the will to receive and entering the spiritual world must be in vessels of bestowal. Meaning without any address to self and for the purpose of adhesion with the Creator. That, no address to self, that is attained through the means of love thy neighbor as thyself, through this society. And adhesion with the Creator is already attained by working with the Creator. After a person acquires vessels of bestowal, he's dealing with the Creator. But, to begin with, it has to be for that purpose, to adhere to the Creator. 

Student: Can we take from this lesson anything about our state, the Israeli public? Can we give this message out? 

M. Laitman: This message: needs to be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation, for a person towards himself and also a person towards a small group of people or a greater group of people, even to the point of the nation or the world. It's also the group towards the world and the nation towards the world, so it doesn't matter. Meaning, each and every part of creation, of the will to receive, that feels itself capable, understanding, attaining the importance of this. He joins according to feeling the importance, knowing the importance both towards himself. And also, that his correction will be towards the rest of reality, the rest of the created being, which is all the other souls. And in order for everyone to truly achieve the degree of adhesion with the Creator. 

Student: Can we go out with this, as if Moses came to the people with this?

M. Laitman: Can we come out with this? This is mandatory for all of us; it's not by chance that he sums up the articles Matan Torah and Arvut that, with that being the mission and this has to be our flag. 

Student: On the one hand they say, it's the end, you have to see the end of it. 

M. Laitman: It's true that it's the end, and you shall be a kingdom of priests. Well, it's not the end, but it's a correction of truly the Bina inside of the person, so it's becoming not for himself, delighted in mercy, Hafetz Hesed. Although these are corrections, two very great corrections, these are acquiring the two degrees of revelation of the face beyond the barrier, to bestow in order to bestow and receive in order to bestow. This is called, the first degree is called “reward and punishment,” the second degree is called “eternal love.” And that is respective to kingdom of priests and a holy nation, but even though they are very high degrees and still far from us, it turns out that you can't move from the smallest degree if you don't take into account where you ultimately need to be. Because the smallest labor needs to already be aimed, as much as you can understand in your present state, it has to be aimed at the final degree. Like he says, why didn't the Kibbutzim or Russia, why didn't they succeed? Because the work that was essentially of love thy neighbor as thyself and they were willing to do it, they couldn't do it. But only the opposite happened, they only discovered the Klipa in it, the shell of it. Because it wasn't, to begin with, aimed at the final goal, the work they did. It wasn't clear to them as preparation for adhesion with the Creator. This had to be a precondition, to begin with, because the end result is in the initial thought. This is the demand in every address, in every condition, in every action of the person because otherwise it is not an action that enters the whole path, this whole track.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (25:42) How do we hold on to these two things, on the one hand? 

M. Laitman: In our work, we always have to worry about the importance and greatness of the Creator in our eyes. And it has to be clear in the group that everything we do, we do to achieve that. For now, we're doing all kinds of actions in order to first take control of our will to receive so as to reach adhesion with the Creator. Controlling the will to receive is expressed first in coming out of its control, right? Beginning to take control over it. That's possible only by being in a society with support and in a certain process that happens from the society, where the true reign over the will to receive is attained through the work called “love thy neighbor as thyself.” Ultimately, love thy friend as thyself is the process. And it's the final state in the correction of the vessels of reception and bestowing in order to bestow, where I have no address to myself; rather, I am all for others. How does he say there, he doesn't say what you have, the others will also have, no, he doesn't say that. He doesn't say, let's all share so everyone has the same, and that's my demand. No, my demand in love thy neighbor as thyself is that I give my only pillow, my only chair. It's not, as yourself, in the sense of 50-50, no. Why? Because then I'm just working with my vessels of reception and I see that in order to feel good, I have to fulfill everyone else because otherwise, they'll come to me and take from me. So, everyone should have everything equally and that, among other things, was also the mistake of the social work they tried to instill in Russia or in the Kibbutzim. They had that motto, that we're all equal and we all have the same. That is insufficient for the correction of the will to receive. The will to receive must become detached from itself because it has a final purpose of adhering to the Creator, becoming compatible to the Creator. The Creator has no thought of self, that I will have what they have, and vice versa. The correction must be that we have to cut off our self as if it doesn't exist. What does it mean to cut it off? Meaning, to fill it, to fill it up in such a way, with such a correction that it doesn't jump in me, that I won't feel its existence. That is attained by fulfillment from above that comes to us and covers us. Blocks us in such a way that I rise above my will to receive. My “I” rises above, this is called above reason, and I don't feel it. Meaning, I feel it and care for it, that it will be filled in such a way that I have no need at all for even the only chair I have or the only pillow I have, and I give it all. And I'm not concerned about having any kind of fulfillment with respect to others, I don't care about the fulfillment. As if I have no will to receive, that's the condition for kingdom of priests. And, of course, it seems to us like some abnormal conditions and above nature and completely, totally, unattainable. But we're not taking into account that, of course, the lights build the vessels and correct the vessels, shake the vessels, fill the vessels, and the lights come from above. And a powerful light that comes for the correction of the vessels, then just like it created the vessel and made it into what it is, to the point of that this final state it was brought to, so it also knows how to correct it. However, the light corrects the Kli according to our decision, our request that comes first, and that's called raising MAN, that's all. We participate in creation only as a baby that sits in the lap of the greater one - the adult, and he says - I want this, and this, and this, and the adult only does it. Except you have to know what to ask so that it's in accord with how the adult planned the actions, the progress, your track of progress, so that you understand the mind of the adult. Because the adult wants you to know and be like him so when you go from infancy to adulthood, you will each time want what He can give you and wants to give you in each and every state, so as to reach a state, to begin with, you know you want to reach a state where you're like Him. And this means that any littlest action must be already for the sake of adhesion with the Creator, you understand? 

Student: This message that we, you know, a year after we've been studying, that we're able to absorb. Is there something from that that we need to take and pass to the public?

M. Laitman: You can't communicate this message to the public because these things are completely abstract. Maybe the public will hear it as things somewhat rational, because they themselves are rationally seeing that they have nothing in their hands to rely on. Humanity will begin to see how much it's hanging in thin air and has nothing. That all the basis of, seemingly, knowing what to do and so on, it happens in a way that it will soon just escape through their fingers. There will be like a baby that's just lost, kind of standing and crying, and doesn't know where mommy is, and afraid to make any step forward, you know. Just kind of standing in the middle of the room, and everyone's gone, and that's it. But we need to certainly approach this “rationally,” seemingly, in quotation marks, right? They're “rational,” you know, right, and give them each time some logical explanation for what we're proposing for them to do, to carry out, to advance in each and every stage. Certainly, if I'll come to the public today and say to them, you don't understand how much your thoughts operate on this, in this world. And you don't need to change anything in this world except for our relationships, our attitude, rather, our intention. Meaning our thought about the world, reality, the upper force. Okay, I change it, what happened, where is it? First of all, everyone will think that I'm disconnected from reality, using these soft, beautiful words. Not that I'm crazy, let's say, I'm not crazy, but such a way, what can we do? Here, you have matters of life and death. And people have to eat and fill themselves with all kinds of things. What are you talking about - thoughts and attitudes that changes reality, can you come to the world with that? Can you say it, what are you telling us, they'll say, what are you proposing us? Maybe you're right, you're correct, and scientists also discover that people influence reality through thought, and people are also, there are those who are more gentle, there are those in humanity who say we have to relate to each other differently, then we'll change the world, the world will be prettier. Meaning, if we relate nicely to one another, then our world, our general feeling will change, true. But where's the proof that if we change our attitude to the world because this is the general force of reality, then we'll receive something from it? Meaning, you're bringing the Creator into this, you're not talking to them socially, but there's a society, these beautiful people who say - let's create a beautiful society, we'll take care of one another, which is clear to everyone, then it can be better if we could attain it. You say no, this is not why we have to be good. We have to be good because by that we, we adapt ourselves to the upper force, then He changes everything about us, and He works on us differently, amazingly. It changes all the forces, the nature changes, not simply our attitudes change between us. Nature will change, and we take into consideration the fact that this piece, this parameter, they don't understand - they don't know that they can feel the Creator. So, either you go into a religion that also disqualified, this habit, a long time ago. Or Islam that is entering fanaticism, or Christianity which is weakened, has come off of that already. There are those who are still in it, but compared to what it was during their wars, their crusades. Or Judaism which is so self-centered and acquired such forms that became also from the religion to this also this kind of a fanatic lifestyle. So, what are you recommending? Of course, you cannot come to humanity and say our attitudes toward the Creator, the upper force, determines all of reality. And not our vessels, not power, or money, or masses of people, but you can't explain it rationally to the people, to the world. This is coming to a person, gradually, as a result of working on himself, his own inner spiritual work. And he begins to see that he's unable to control himself. What's, you know, how the upper force is beginning to play with him toward a certain goal. And he begins to feel that he is dealing with a partner, a great, all-encompassing partner that built this world around him and gave him all these conditions in order to advance him toward the goal. Before you explain this to humanity, you have to set up a dissemination system, an information system, very slow, to help them understand. On the other hand, humanity has no choice, it comes to a state where somehow it agrees, like little children and slaves, that they have any choice. You give them what they want somehow in order to fulfill their desires for the time being. And by that, you acquire them, and they're ready when they're serving without reason, without knowledge, they're willing to obey. That's why they're on the degree of slaves, or children, or women, right? A woman concedes nine portions in order to be free because why does she need to be free, she attains nothing. She's willing to be in this one line and to be dependent. What does this dependency give her? She gives all she has only to have something to eat, why does she need this dependence? She gives up her possessions just to feel this dependency because this dependency helps her. It gives her a feeling of being alive, that she's advancing, that she relies on something. This dependency fills her more than these nine other portions. This feeling of belonging to the great One, to the One that's certain, the eternal One. And then there's no choice, they will come, they will hear. You just have to do this gradually as you go through all the degrees. But in all the degrees, what seems like a problem, seemingly, in all the degrees, you have to define from the get-go, you have to insert the matter of adhesion in the Creator as a final goal, this is a must. As much as we can do it, as much as we can do it in our world, in our time, in our generation, we should do it. If we can't, we'll leave it to the next generation. 

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (43:18) Will there be a next generation if we don't succeed?

M. Laitman: Well, it's not on you to finish the job, it says, right? We have to try with all our might and what will happen, that's already a thing. To which state and which place can we come to? That's not of our concern, meaning the result is not on us. 

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (43:55) The fact there's an upper force, a law that rules over reality, how can you describe that in a way that at least sounds rational? 

M. Laitman: How to explain to a person what is the general law of reality, that it's rational? From two directions: from the side of life, human life, social life, and here we can truly rely on scientists, philosophers, scientists of all kinds that are certainly coming to it in their studies. And their conclusions are very, very close to this view that there is an upper force in the world, that this upper force has a mind, has a freedom of choice, has personal changes, if you can say it relative to us. It changes and it depends, but they change and depend only on Him, meaning it's not some blind nature, but it's something that is called the upper thought. It's hard for us to define it differently, the upper thought, the upper desire. They discovered that even from studying nature, and I understand them very well, because I too arrived at that conclusion from that, that's on their part. And on our part, as much as we can explain the wisdom of Kabbalah, and if we cleanse it from all this waste, and all this garbage that got stuck to it and show them what's written in the true sources, authentic, fundamental sources, something that no person can disrespect. Some people can be afraid of it, but no one can refuse to accept it seriously. So, if we succeed in sharing these sources, in addition to quoting them directly, authentically, we also give them a very simple explanation. Simple, something that can be grasped by people easily, by everyone. This is something that has to be perceived and grasped immediately, even by a small mind, because also according to people who don't have time today. They're not able to delve into a deep thought for more than a few seconds. So, even according to their perception, everybody's very little, they're small. So, the message has to be such as, as we say, fast and easy, – as close as it can be to that law of equivalence of form. It can be closer to their vessels, where each time they need to overcome in order to grasp this message. It will be a small overcoming, but oh, they got it, oh, they got it again. Just like that, a little bit of effort, and he's in it, he's in what I wanted to introduce to him.

Student: About that first part, there are scientists today, known scientists, who claim that their studies say that there is an upper force, right? 

M. Laitman: Yes, yes, there are many scientists like that, I started this work, we are in contact with them, we need to receive in the next few weeks some material about this, and to be connected to them. And we might, we may have some sort of a convention or a meeting, not only with one of them. And it will fall be under this heading of revealing the upper force. And all kinds of scientists and philosophers, physicists, chemists, biologists from different areas of investigating nature. How, through investigating nature, and investigating the internality of men like psychologists and philosophers, we come to the same state, the same conclusion in our investigations. That there is an upper force above us, who likely has such qualities, and He likely has a certain goal for us, a purpose, and we should respond accordingly to it. And it's possible that what's happening to us today is because we're, we're not in contact, in the correct contact with it, and we don't observe the laws that He established in nature. Something of that nature, I think a convention, a meeting, a conference, and I think that there are enough people in the world with the education, with a degree, with their state. Meaning, their status in society and in science, such people who can say it in such a way that it will be heard, on the one hand. On the other hand, us, who are in the wisdom of Kabbalah, we can add to those things, to what they're saying, to all their discoveries. Let's say, either in quantum physics or through studying biological life, or studying psychological human nature, we can add to it and we can support it by Kabbalah – why does it happen? And in all areas, seemingly, levels in reality, in nature, in the still, vegetative, inanimate degrees, and provide our own explanation. Together with them and also facing them, across from them so to speak, and in such a way to scrutinize things so it'll be easy and convincing to the general public. That's on the one hand, on our part, and on the part of the upper force, because for the time being we don't obey it, this upper force. And certainly, we'll get into even worse states where the blows, as we know, they purify a person. Then it begins to, he becomes sensitive, he becomes understanding, wants to feel, to hear that maybe perhaps these blows depend on things that he doesn't understand, he can't even see the reason for them, but he wants to get rid of them. So, he wants to see the reason, even if it's concealed. And so, we come to a place where we explain together with scientists, together with people who can also present our explanation, which is actually the means for escaping the blows, let's call it like that for the time being. On the other hand, the public is in a state where he wants to hear, it doesn't matter what solution, but just bring us a solution. Just like a sick person, just you know, get me a medication. I don't care what you give me, just help me get rid of the problem; the process is extremely rational. 

Student: Each such state demands a proof for itself, one - that there's an upper force, two - that it works on us, and so on? 

M. Laitman: We don't need to find proof; we need to engage with our world because we are in our world on the one hand. On the other hand, we have something that belongs to the upper world, right, our method, our perception. So, we need nothing more than to arrange these things and connect these things together. Meaning, the phenomena in nature and the explanation above nature, where do these going to come from? Why they appear to us in such a way? We need only to make the right connection, the right picture, clear, convincing, understood, and this is enough.

Student: How will it be perceived as a science without experimentation and proof? Theory, fine – there's many theories – but how will a person grasp that? 

M. Laitman: Well, certainly we present it as a theory; this theory, it's a double theory. It's a theory because there isn't, seemingly in our feelings, in our proof, there isn't a degree where you can show it. No clear occurrences such that no one will have the ability to deny it. So, on the one hand, it is a theory because you construct what's happening here in our world based on a reason, a cause, that is invisible to us, only according to your logic, according to what accumulated from your own experimentation. This is one theory, and the second theory is that even though you have constructed it and you've attained it, you can even, seemingly, prove it through your convincing. Not through facts on the ground. You can't reveal the Creator and say, He's to blame, He did it, and we are such and such, no, you can't. It, nevertheless, remains on the level of logical proof, kind of an abstract theory. Why is it multiplied? It's a theory within a theory because you can never show everyone that these things are in the form of, okay, let's do it, and now it will be. Because the minute you say, let's do it and now it will be, seemingly it will be. It's like taking a staff and stick it in the mountain and you get water, right, these things won't happen. Meaning, we have to be prepared for things that won't happen immediately. And although we took the theory as a means, as an instrument for changing the state of the world, there was never a proof for it in nature. Meaning for it to materialize that we did such and such an experiment and we have attained such and such positive results. Just as we see when they identify some medication for an illness, there's a known illness, there's a blow. Then you do some experiments, and you bring the results to the whole world. And the world agrees, and you receive approval for marketing this medicine. Here, it's hard for me to say that it will happen in this way, because if it did, humanity would not advance to the form of adhesion in the Creator but to the opposite form. Meaning, when we enter the solution here, we understand why the Creator gives us, on the other hand, sufferings, and torments, and then why does it say that the suffering softens the body. What does it mean that they soften the body, tenderize the body, because people will be ready to absorb.