The transcript has been transcribed and edited from English simultaneous interpretation, thus there may be potential semantic inaccuracies within it.

Daily Morning Lesson: June 29, 2026

Part 1: Rabash. One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future. Article No. 9, (1987)

Original lesson date: 15/01/2002

Reader: Dear friends, in the first part of the lesson, we will watch a recorded lesson from May 1st, 2002, based on the article, "One's Greatness Depends on the Measure of One's Faith in the Future." We will read the article together in the Ten. Pay attention, note that the article is very long, it will take 55 minutes, thereabouts.

Reading: (00:46) One’s Greatness Depends on the Measure of One’s Faith in the Future

Article 9, 1987

It is written in The Zohar (BeShalach, Item 216): “‘Then shall Moses ... sing.’ It should have said, ‘Sang.’ And it replies, ‘But this thing depends on the future, when he complemented for that time and complemented for the future, when Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future.’ ‘This singing’ is in female form [in Hebrew], but it should have said, ‘This song,’ in male form [in Hebrew]. And it replies, ‘This singing is that the queen praises the King.’ Rabbi Yehuda said, ‘Thus, if it is the singing of the queen to the King, why does it say, ‘Moses and the children of Israel’? After all, the queen should have been the one who is praising.’ It replies, ‘Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.’”

We should understand the answer that he gives about what is written in future tense, that it refers to the future. What does it come to teach us in the work? We should also understand about the answer he is giving, why it writes “singing” in female form, which interprets the intention to Malchut, meaning that Malchut is praising the King, about which Rabbi Yehuda asked. Thus, if he is referring to Malchut, why does it say, “Moses and the children of Israel”? For this reason, he must interpret that his intention is Moses and Israel, who know how to praise the King for the Malchut. We should also understand the meaning of Moses and Israel having to praise the King for the Malchut, and why they do not have to praise the King for themselves, but for Malchut.

It is known that Moses is called “the faithful shepherd.” Baal HaSulam interpreted that Moses was providing Israel with faith, and faith is called Malchut [kingship]. In other words, he instilled fear of heaven, called “kingdom of heaven,” into the people of Israel. This is why Moses is called “the faithful shepherd,” after the faith. It is written about it, “And they believed in the Lord and in his servant, Moses,” meaning for Moses instilling in them faith in the Creator.

It is known that one cannot live from negativity, but from positivity. This is so because “nourishment” refers to what a person receives and enjoys receiving. This comes to us from the purpose of creation, called “His desire to do good to His creations.” Therefore, a person must receive delight and pleasure so as to have something with which to delight one’s body. This is called “positivity,” meaning a filling. And with this filling, he satisfies his needs.

But a person also needs a lack. Otherwise, there is no place in which the light of life can enter. A lack is called “a Kli” [a vessel]. This means that if one has no Kelim [vessels], he cannot receive anything. A lack is called “a desire,” meaning that he has a desire for something and he feels that he is lacking this thing and wishes to satisfy the need. To the extent that he feels its absence and to the extent that he needs to satisfy his need, this is the measure of his lack. In other words, a great lack or a small lack depends on the measure of one’s sense of necessity to satisfy that need.

This means that if a person comes to feel that he is lacking something, and he feels that feeling in his every organ, yet he does not have a strong desire to satisfy his need, there are many reasons why he does not have such a great desire to satisfy his need.

He told his friends what he needs, and he feels the necessity for it. However, the friends made him see that what he needs is unattainable. So his friends influenced him with their views that he must accept his situation. They weakened his strength to overcome so he can prevail over the obstacles on his way to obtaining what he wants. In consequence, the need and craving weakened, too, since he sees that he will never obtain what he wants. For this reason, meaning because he sees that it is utterly impossible that he will ever be able to satisfy his need, this is the reason why he does not obtain his goal—it causes him to lessen his lack. It turns out that his great desire has waned due to despair.
Sometimes he does not even tell his friends what he wants; he only hears from friends speaking with each other. He hears that they have already given up, and that affects him, too. In other words, their despair affects him and he loses the enthusiasm that he had for achieving Dvekut [adhesion] as soon as possible. Thus, he loses that willpower.
Sometimes one thinks for himself without any slander from the outside, but sees that each time he wishes to draw near to Kedusha [holiness], when he begins to analyze, he realizes the opposite, that he is regressing instead of moving forward. And this causes him to lose his strength for the work.

It turns out that then he collapses under his load. He has nothing from which to receive sustenance because he sees only negativity and darkness. Thus, he loses the spirit of life that he had when he seemingly had some livelihood, called “sustaining his soul.” Now he feels spiritually dead, meaning he cannot make a single movement in the work, just as if he were actually dead.

This means that even though now he sees the truth, meaning the recognition of evil, it is negative, and from this, one cannot receive any livelihood, since provision of the body is specifically from positivity. Therefore, one must walk on the right line for two reasons: 1) to keep his desire from waning when he hears slander, 2) to receive vitality, which is specifically from positivity, meaning that it is positive, that there is a matter of wholeness here.

However, it is difficult to understand how, when he criticizes his work-order and sees that his being immersed in self-love is the truth, how can he be told to walk on the right line, which is called “wholeness”? After all, as far as he can see, when he judges honestly, it is a total lie.

It is known that general and particular are equal. This means that the individual follows the same order that applies to the collective. In regard to the collective, it was given to us to believe in the coming of the Messiah (in the prayer, “I Believe”), “I believe in the coming of the Messiah. And though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

Hence, one must never give up and say, “I see that I cannot obtain Dvekut [adhesion] with the Creator.” This is considered that he exits the exile among the nations of the world, called “self-love,” and comes under the authority of Kedusha [holiness], and comes to correct the root of his soul and cling to the Life of Lives.

It follows that if one believes in the general redemption, he should believe that redemption will come to him in particular. Hence, one should receive wholeness for himself with respect to the future, in a way that one should depict for himself the measure of goodness, pleasure, and joy that he will receive when all his needs are satisfied. This certainly gives him emotional satisfaction and energy to work to obtain this goal that he hopes to achieve.

It turns out that first one must depict for himself what he is hoping for—that it will make him happy and joyful if he obtains what he anticipates. However, first one should thoroughly know the goal he wants to obtain. If one does not pay close attention and much scrutiny to what he expects from his life, meaning that he should tell himself, “Now I have decided what I want, after analyzing the joy in life that can be obtained in the world.”

If he has the opportunity to obtain this, he will have the strength and wisdom to say, “Now I can thank the Creator for creating His world.” Now he can wholeheartedly say, “Blessed is He who said, ‘Let there be the world,’ since I feel the delight and pleasure, that it is truly worthwhile for me and for all creations to receive this delight and pleasure that I have now received from the purpose of creation, called ‘His desire to do good to His creations.’”

And although he is still far from obtaining the goal, if he nonetheless knows for certain from what he can receive his future happiness, it is as it is written (Avot, Chapter 6), “Rabbi Meir says, ‘Anyone who engages in Torah Lishma [for Her sake] is rewarded with a great many things. Moreover, the whole world is worthwhile for him. He is let into the secrets of the Torah and he becomes like an everlasting spring.’”

When he pays attention to this—to what he can achieve—meaning when he feels the importance of the goal and depicts for himself the happiness he will achieve, the joy that he will experience when he attains it are unimaginable.

Thus, to the extent that he believes in the importance of the goal, and to the extent that he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can receive the filling of the light of life from the future goal. It is known that there is inner light and there is surrounding light. Baal HaSulam interpreted “inner light” as referring to what one receives in the present, and “surrounding light” as the light that is destined to shine, but which one has not yet attained. However, the surrounding light shines, to an extent, in the present, to the extent of his confidence that he will attain it.

He said that this is like a person who bought merchandise from the market. Since many people brought this merchandise to the market, it had little value. All the merchants wanted to sell the merchandise at any price, but there were no buyers because everyone was afraid to buy, perhaps it might grow even cheaper.

Then one man bought all the merchandise for a very low price. When he came home and told them what happened in the market, they all laughed at him: “What did you do? Of course all the merchants wanted to sell all the merchandise they had in stock. This will only make everything cheaper, and as a result, you will lose all your money.”

But he insisted, saying, “Now I am happier than ever, since I will profit from this merchandise not as before, when I knew I could get twenty percent profit from the merchandise. Instead, I’ll make a five hundred percent profit. However, I will not sell it now. I will store it and I will take it to the market in three years, for by then this merchandise will not be found here in the country, and I will get the price that I want.”

It turns out that if he calculates how much he has earned in the present, meaning this year, then he has nothing. This is considered that he has nothing in the present with which to be happy.

This is an allegory about the inner light, which shines in the present. However, the surrounding light, called “light that shines specifically in the future,” shines in the present, too, to the extent of his belief that in the future he will receive the full reward he hopes for, and then his joy will be complete. Now he is receiving joy and high spirits from what he will receive in the future.

This explains the above allegory, that this merchant was ridiculed by everyone for buying the merchandise in the market precisely when it was irrelevant, when no one wanted to buy it. Yet, he bought it as something that others left because it was worthless, and now he is delighted because he is one hundred percent sure that in three years this merchandise will not be found anywhere and then he will get rich. And so, he enjoys in the present what will happen in the future.

It follows that to the extent that he believes that it will come to him—and does not despair about the future—as it is written, “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still,” he can enjoy in the present what will come in the future.

Thus, when a person is told that even though he walked on the left line—meaning criticized and saw that he was in utter baseness—and he sees this truth, since he does not wish to deceive himself and justify his thoughts and actions, but seeks the truth and does not care if the truth is bitter, yet he wishes to reach the goal for which he was born, but because of all this truth he cannot go on living, since it is impossible to live without pleasure, called “vitality” and “life.” To live, one needs light, which revives a person. By living, it is possible to work and to reach the goal. For this reason, he must then shift to the right line, called “wholeness.”

However, this wholeness—from which he now receives the liveliness that sustains his body—should be built on a basis of truth. This brings up the question, “How can he receive wholeness when he sees the truth, that he is in the lowest state, immersed in self-love from head to toe and without a spark of bestowal?”

To that he should say, “Everything I see is true.” However, it is so from the perspective of the inner light. This means that in the present, he is in lowliness and has nothing from which to receive joy and life. But from the perspective of the surrounding light, which is the future, he believes that “Though he may be delayed, I await his arrival still.”

It turns out that through the surrounding light that shines in relation to the future, he can draw it so it will shine in the present. And to the extent of the faith and confidence that he has in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, he can draw vitality and joy so it will shine in the present.

It follows that now that he is walking on the right line to receive wholeness, it is the real truth, since the surrounding light shines in the present. And besides, it is a path of truth, and since by believing in the coming of the Messiah on the personal level, it is a great remedy that through the commandment of faith, the future will draw nearer to the present in him. This means that the surrounding light will be internal. This is considered that the light actually dresses in the present. It is called “the surrounding will become internal.”

Thus, from here—meaning from faith, from believing that in the end he will reach the goal, even though reason shows him each time that he is retreating from the goal and not advancing—he overcomes and goes above reason. And then faith itself accumulates each time in the form of “penny by penny joins into a great amount,” until he is rewarded with permanent whole faith, which is the attainment of the light of Hassadim in illumination of Hochma, as it is written in the Sulam commentary.

Now we can understand what we asked about why The Zohar explains that this is why it is written, “Shall ... sing,” in future tense. By that, it implies that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. What does that come to teach us in the work? In matters of work, we should know what we have now, in the present, and know what we must do. Thus, what can we learn about what the future holds?

As we explained, we must walk on the right line, which is wholeness, and receive vitality from it, because it is impossible to live from negativity. Hence, there is advice to feel wholeness from what will be in the future. This is the meaning of what the righteous call, “singing in the future.” In other words, now—in the present—they are singing about what they will receive in the future. This means that to the extent that they picture the delight and pleasure they will receive in the future, they can feel it in the present, provided they have faith that there is a future, meaning that in the future everyone will be corrected.

This is something one can already be thankful for in the present. To the extent that he feels it, this is the measure of the praise that he can give in the present. And besides receiving life in the present from positivity, he gains from the goal in general being important for him because he must picture for himself the delight and pleasure in store for the creatures to receive.

And each time he contemplates the matter, he gradually sees a bit more of what he can receive in the future, meaning what has been prepared for us by the purpose of creation. And although he sees that in his current state he is miles away from the goal, this depends on the measure of his faith in the goal, as in the example of the allegory above. This follows the rule, “All that is certain to be collected is deemed collected” (Yevamot 38).

With the above, we can understand what The Zohar explains—that the reason why it writes “Shall ... sing,” in future tense, is to imply that Israel are destined to praise this singing in the future. This is so because we must know this, so we can receive joy and vitality in the present from what will be in the future. By this we can sing in the present as if now we were receiving all the delight and pleasure.

This is regarded as being able to receive illumination from a surrounding. In other words, the surrounding shines in the internal from afar, meaning that although a person is still far from obtaining the delight and pleasure, he can still draw illumination from the Surrounding Light also in the present.

Now we will explain what we asked about The Zohar explaining why he writes, “This singing” in female form [in Hebrew]. It is because Moses and Israel know how to properly praise the King for the queen. And we asked, “Why do Moses and Israel not praise the King for themselves?”

First, we must understand why we have to praise the King. In corporeality, we understand that a flesh and blood king needs honors, to be respected. He enjoys the praises that the people give him. But with regard to the Creator, why does He need us to praise Him and sing before Him chants and songs?

It is a known rule that everything we say in regard to the Creator is only by way of “By Your actions we know You.” However, there is no attainment in Him, Himself, whatsoever. Rather, all we speak of relates to the attainment of the lower ones.

This is the reason why one must praise and thank the Creator, for by this one can measure and assume the greatness and importance of the giving that the Creator has given him. To that extent, one can test how much importance and greatness of the King he feels.

The purpose of creation is to do good to His creations, meaning for the creatures to enjoy Him. And by the measure of the greatness of the Giver, there is meaning and pleasure in giving, that they give Him in order to delight. And when one tries to give thanks, he already has reason for considering and scrutinizing the giving: what he received and from whom he received, meaning the greatness of the giving and the greatness of the giver.

It follows that one’s gratitude should not be because the upper one will enjoy it, but so that the lower one will enjoy it. Otherwise, it is similar to the allegory that Baal HaSulam said about the verse, “Who has not taken My name in vain.”

He asked, “What does it mean that a person takes in vain? Does it mean that he was given a soul from above in vain?” He said that it is similar to a child being given a bag of gold coins. He is delighted about the coins because they look so nice and are lovely to look at. But the child is incapable of assessing the value of the gold coins.

From this we can understand that the gratitude and praise that we give to the Creator are only to benefit the creatures, meaning that we have something by which to praise the King. This means that when one tries to praise the Creator, this is the time when he is capable of feeling the importance of the gift and the importance of the giver of the gift. For this reason, what one should mind most is the praise that one gives to the King. This enables him to be given every time anew. Otherwise, if one cannot appreciate the King’s gift, one cannot be given anything because he falls under the definition of “Who is a fool? He who loses what he is given” (Hagigah 4a).

And what is the reason that a fool loses what he is given? This is simple: He is a fool. He does not appreciate the importance of the matter, so he does not pay attention to keeping the gift that he has been given. For this reason, the extent of the importance of the gift is his keeping of it. Thus, he can be in a state of constant ascension because it is evident that he does not lose what he is given, for he appreciates it.

It follows from the above that one may have many descents because he does not appreciate the gift of the King. In other words, he cannot appreciate the measure of importance of the nearing—that he has been given from above a desire and a thought that it is worthwhile to be a servant of the Creator.

And since he did not appreciate the importance of the matter, meaning the calling that he was given—to enter and serve the King—he might even corrupt, if he serves the King without knowing how to keep himself from blemishing something. In that state, a person is thrown back to a place of garbage and waste.

In that state, he sustains himself on the same waste that cats and dogs search to sustain themselves, and he, too, searches for provision for his body in that place. He does not see that he can find provision elsewhere. Meaning, during the descent, those things that he said were waste and unfit as food for humans—but are suitable as food only for animals—he himself chases that provision and has no desire for human food because he finds it completely tasteless.

For this reason, the stability of the states of ascent depends primarily on the importance of the matter. This is why it depends mainly on the praise and gratitude he gives to being accepted from above. This is so because the praises themselves that he gives to the Creator enhance His importance and esteem. This is why we are commanded to think very seriously about praising.

There are three discernments in regard to praising:

1. The measure of the giving. This means that the importance of the gift is according to the measure of praise and gratitude that one gives for the gift.

2. The greatness of the giver, meaning if the giver is an important person. For example, if the king gives a present to someone, the gift may be a very small thing but it will still be very important. In other words, the measure of the praise and gratitude does not take the greatness of the gift into account, but rather measures the greatness of the giver. Meaning, the same person might give to two people, but to one, the giver is more important and he recognizes the importance and greatness of the giver. Thus, he will be more grateful than the other, who does not recognize the importance of the giver to the same extent.

3. The greatness of the giver, regardless of whether he gives or not. Sometimes, the king is so important in the eyes of a person, that the person has a strong desire to merely speak to the king, but not because he wishes to speak to the king so the king will give him something. He doesn’t want anything, but his whole pleasure is in having the privilege of speaking to the king.

However, it is impolite to come to the king without some request, so he is searching for some request that the king may grant. In other words, he says that he wants to come to the king so the king will give him something, but in truth, he says that he wants the king to give him something only on the outside. In his heart, he does not want anything from the king. Just having the ability to speak to the king is enough for him and it does not matter to him if the king has given him something or not.

When people on the outside see that he did not receive a thing from the king, and look at him as he is walking out of the king’s house delighted and elated, they laugh at him. They tell him, “What a fool you are! How mindless are you? You can see for yourself that you are leaving as empty-handed as you came in. You walked into the king to ask for something of the king, yet you walked out empty-handed, so why the joy?”

We can understand this if while a person prays to the Creator to give him something, we can discern about it, 1) that one prays to the Creator to give him what he demands of the Creator. If He accepts his demand for the prayer to be granted, when he receives what he wants, he is willing to thank the Creator. And the extent of salvation that he received from the Creator is the extent of his joy, high spirits, praise, and gratitude. In other words, everything is measured by the degree of salvation he has received from the Creator.

2) The measure of the greatness of the Giver. In other words, to the extent that he believes in the greatness of the Creator, this is what determines for him what he receives from the Creator. That is, even though in the eyes of the receiver it is a small thing, he still received something from the Creator. Thus, he can already be happy and praise and thank the Creator, since it is the giver who is important to him, as in the above-mentioned allegory.

3) The greatness of the giver without giving. He, too, has great importance. In other words, the king is so important in his eyes that he does not want anything from the king, but will consider it great fortune if he can speak even a few words with the king. And the reason why he comes in with some request is only superficial, since one cannot come before the king without some request. Yet, he did not come for the king to grant his request. The reason he said he was asking for something was only for the external ones, who do not understand that speaking to the king is the most valuable giving, but the external ones do not understand it.

When we speak of a single body, we should say that “external ones” are the thoughts that come to a person from the outside world, meaning those who have no concept of the internality, and have no tools to understand that the internality of the king is what counts. Rather, they value the king only by what extends from the king to them, which is called “the externality of the king.” But they have no clue of the internality of the king, meaning the king himself and not what extends from the king outward.

Hence, these thoughts mock a person when he says, “Since I just spoke to the king, it does not matter if the king is granting my wish.” Rather, his only wish is the internality of the king, not what extends from him.

Therefore, if a person prays to the Creator and does not see that the Creator has given him something—since what matters to him is the internality of the king—he can be happy and rejoice in having been rewarded with speaking to the king. Yet, external thoughts within him wish to revoke that joy in him because they consider only the vessels of reception—what he has received from the king in his vessels of reception, while he tells them, “I am delighted and joyful, and I praise and thank the king simply for having given me the chance to speak with him. This is enough for me.”

Moreover, he says to his external ones, “Know that I want nothing from the king except to praise him and thank him. By this I adhere to the king because I want to bestow upon him by praising him. I have nothing else to give him. It follows that now I am considered ‘a servant of the Creator,’ and not ‘a servant of myself.’ For this reason, I cannot hear your telling me, ‘What have you gained?’”

“For example, all year long you engaged in Torah and in prayer, keeping all the Mitzvot [commandments], but you are still standing on the same degree as a year ago or two ago. Thus, why the joy that you praise the Creator and say, ‘This is my gain, that I spoke to the Creator many times, and what else do I need?’ In other words, if the king had given me something, I might have received it in order to receive. But now that I have nothing in my hand, I am happy and thank the Creator because my intention in the work was only to bestow.”

However, since in that state a person is telling the truth, he faces strong resistance from the external ones, who cannot tolerate one who is walking on the path of truth, if his only aim is to bestow. In that state, he has a great war, and they wish to shatter his joy. They make him think that the opposite is true—that what they are telling him is the path of truth, and that he is deceiving himself thinking that he is right.

In this world, a lie usually succeeds. For this reason, he needs great strengthening, and to tell them, “I am walking on the path of truth, and now I want to hear no criticism. If there is truth in your words, I ask that you will come to me with your complaints, to show me the truth, when I decide it is time for criticism. Only at that time will I be willing to listen to your views.”

It therefore follows that in order for one to have joy in the work of the Creator, all he needs is faith. In other words, when he believes in the greatness of the Creator, he does not need the King to give him anything. Simply being able to speak to the King is all he wants, meaning to speak to the Creator, as mentioned in the third discernment of giving praise.

If he pays more attention to praising the King, then high inspiration will come to him by itself because he does not want anything from the King. This is similar to the Sefira Bina. It is known that at its end, Hochma does not wish to receive the light of Hochma, but Hochma wishes to bestow upon the Emanator as the Emanator bestows upon Hochma. And she wants equivalence of form.

In that state, the abundance, called “light of Hassadim,” after the Kli, comes by itself. This means that the receiver wishes to engage in Hesed [grace/mercy], hence the abundance is called “light of Hassadim” [plural of Hesed]. It is similar here. When a person wants nothing of the King except to bestow upon the King, and pays attention to what He thinks, an inspiration from above comes upon him by itself when he engages in singing and praising of the King, to the extent that he has prepared himself.

Now we can understand the matter of Moses and Israel singing and praising the King for the queen, and not the queen herself. It is known that everything we say about the upper worlds is only in relation to the souls, that Malchut is called “the collective soul of Israel” or “the assembly of Israel.” It is explained in The Study of the Ten Sefirot (Part 16), that the soul of Adam HaRishon came out from the interior of the worlds Beria, Yetzira, and Assiya, from which he received Nefesh, Ruach, Neshama. And they all came out from Malchut de [of] Atzilut, called Shechina [Divinity]. And Zeir Anpin, who gives to the Malchut, is called “King.”

Since Malchut is the receiver for the souls, it follows that Malchut cannot receive abundance for the people of Israel because they are still unfit—having no vessels of bestowal. Otherwise, it will all go to the Sitra Achra [other side], who are called “dead,” since there is reception in order to receive in them, which is called “separation and remoteness from the Creator,” who is called “the Life of Lives.” This is why they are called “dead.”

In The Zohar, it is considered that a person must be concerned about the sorrow of the Shechina, meaning sorrow at not being able to receive abundance for her children, who are the people of Israel. She is called “the assembly of Israel” because she assembles within her the abundance that she should give to Israel. Therefore, when the people of Israel engage in equivalence of form, there is room for Malchut to receive the upper abundance from the King, who is called “the Giver,” ZA, so as to give to the people of Israel.

This is called “Malchut, who is called ‘the Queen,’ praising the King for the abundance she has received from Him.” Likewise, when she cannot receive abundance for Israel from the King, it is called “the sorrow of the Shechina.” And when she can receive abundance, she is called “The mother of the sons is happy,” and she praises the King.

Yet, all the sorrow and joy relate only to the whole of Israel. This is why The Zohar says that Moses and Israel say the song, meaning praise the king for the queen. It means that the reason why Moses and Israel praise the king is for the queen, which means that they have established themselves to praise the King, since what the King was to give to Moses and Israel was not for themselves, but for Malchut. In other words, they cannot tolerate the sorrow of the Shechina, which is why they engage in equivalence of form, so that Malchut can bestow. This is why it says, “Happy are Moses and Israel, for they know how to properly praise the King for the queen.”

Reader: We will now move to a lesson from May 1st, 2002.

M. Laitman: (55:22) “The Greatness Depends on the Measure of Faith in the Future.” The person rises through the degrees during the period of preparation towards crossing the barrier, entering the King's hall, and every time he has this state where he receives a great illumination from above that sustains him, fills him, awakens him. And then he falls. Instead of receiving an even greater illumination, he receives darkness. And here, in the state of darkness, the person is measured. What's happening with the person? In the state of darkness, the higher he rose, if he didn't cross the barrier, then when the light doesn't shine, he becomes the opposite, a beast. He doesn't know anything. Nothing matters except to just exist in a beastly form. That's it. He feels that he hasn't advanced. The same way he was in his beastly nature, all these falls a year ago or two - now it is the same thing. True, he was a beast, and now he's a beast as well. If that divine spirit departs him, he remains a beastly spirit. In these states, it is possible to measure if he's in some kind of advancement - if he's advancing in bestowal or not, because if he can read even a few words, think about them in a very simple way, not deep, but if he can do it, if he still has some kind of appreciation. Or, the darker a state gets, well, then you can say that he has some beginnings of vessels of bestowal, because he sees that for himself he has nothing, no fulfillment, and he lives only from this state where he's connected to the King. And then in that state, he's not getting confused by pleasures shining upon him with some feeling of the self, some nice feeling that he receives, and he's all inflated, but rather, in truth, there is no calculation he can make for himself, and he cannot justify the Creator, because he doesn't receive anything from Him, and so he has to live only on faith. What is faith here? Faith in spirituality, beyond the Machsom [the barrier] is the light of Hassadim, the light of grace, and complete faith is the light of Hassadim with the illumination of Hochma. For us - faith is, well, we don't have the light of Hassadim, we don't have the light of Hassadim in the illumination of Hochma - faith, for us, means that a person received some illumination from above, which sustains him for a time. And that is faith, the light that sustains him. Or, as we have in the fall, actually, where this illumination departs, and only the importance he receives from the society - only that, not from above, from the society, meaning he hears. Previously he heard, and this serves him in the present, that this is important. This importance, now, during the darkness, he equipped himself with this importance previously, when he could hear and serve the society - and he was in high spirits from what excited, by what he was told, and what he read, and what he heard from the Rav - these three sources, yes: the society, the Rav, and the books. So the greatness of the goal that he received - not from above, from above everything departs now, but from his environment, the recognition of the greatness of the goal, meaning it's verbal, he received it verbally - now, according to the importance he has for spirituality during the time of darkness, he feels this illumination from without, which is called faith. And it sustains him, the light sustains him. Without the light, there's nothing to speak of.

M. Laitman: (01:00:47) But what is the cause of this light? Either that light comes through an awakening from above, and then the person is in a good state, and he's willing to do, to invest, nothing matters, nothing can stop him. Or that light, that illumination comes due to the effort that the person made, his investment in the importance of the goal, equipping himself with the feeling of the importance of the goal. And then according to his efforts, the light of importance shines for him, the light of faith, as we call it. And then the darkness doesn't matter to him. Even though he enters the King's hall and leaves, and doesn't receive anything, he thanks Him for not giving him anything. He thanks Him for being in a fall, in the state of a beast at present, as in many previous descents, he thanks Him for receiving these states from Him. He doesn't measure the states in terms of how much do I have, how much do I get from every fall, every ascent? Instead, he simply understands that by this, he's using his vessels of reception, and he advances and measures his states according to the magnitude of the efforts that he can activate, and so to receive the light of faith by his own power, from below. And that is the right way to measure it, that a person reaches a state where in both descents and ascents, only one thing is important to him. Only from him and upwards, towards the Creator, that his attitude towards the Creator will not change. So we say that he fills with his light, with the reflected light, with the light of faith, from below upwards, he fills the vessel, instead of that light coming from above downwards. Then it is said that he's willing to give to the Creator. What does he give the Creator? By filling himself with this light, that's his giving, yes, instead of the Creator filling him. And then the Creator clothes to the same extent within the person, and both the direct light and the reflected light are clothed together, and that is called inner light. We need to read the article again, to go through it slowly. Rabash doesn't write about these states for no reason. And we can see on ourselves, when we look at each other, we can see more or less what states we're in, ascending, descending as a group and individually. We have to reach a state where this doesn't change us - what state I am in, whatever states, ascents, descents, joy, anxiety, whatever influences me? The presence of, or the lack of, illumination from above, that doesn't - that poses no obstacle. We need to fill this lack immediately with the light of faith.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:05:02) According to the drawing we always make, a direct light comes, and as a result, the reflected light comes. Then there's fulfillment. Here, there needs to be work from below. There has to be reflected light first, then there's faith, and direct light clothes in that.

M. Laitman: According to the drawing, the direct light comes and, yes, it interfaces with the screen, and the screen reflects it. We are in a place where it's before the direct light comes and strikes the screen, because if there's no screen, the direct light doesn't come, we don't feel that it exists. To the extent that there is a screen, we begin to feel pressure from the direct light, because after the restriction, there is a decision in Malchut that I'm guarding all the conditions of the restrictions, so that in no individual desire of mine will there ever be anything outside of what was decided upon in my general desire. I was restricted. What does it mean, I was restricted? No desire of mine will go to receive in order to receive, and as an outcome of that, there is no desire to receive without the screen feeling the light. It doesn't go to receive in order to receive. The restriction restricts it, it makes a concealment over that light, yes? Meaning, we don't feel pressure from the Creator wanting to clothe us in our desire, because our desires aren't corrected. To the extent that you have a screen in order to bestow, then to that extent, you will immediately feel pressure from the upper light, which wants to clothe within the corrected desire. The corrected desire is called soul. Now, then there's a question. The light comes and strikes the screen. Where is the light of faith here? Reflected light, all these things, they exist before that, in the time of darkness. You build a screen from the dark, and when there is a screen, to the extent that you have a screen, to that extent you have the power to sustain the restriction and the power of faith. What is a screen? A screen over the vessels of bestowal and a screen over the vessels of reception, either to bestow in order to bestow, or even to receive in order to bestow. Meaning, the measure of the screen, the magnitude of the screen attests to the measure of faith. We need to equip ourselves with that, previously, beforehand. Of course, the light does this. A screen without light. The light of AB-SAG, yes, but the demand for it we develop only through our efforts from below. And the effort from below comes through inspiration by books and authors, as we say - the environment, not from above. Here there needs to be exertion from the person, so the vessel precedes the light.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:08:45) When a person feels ascent, he feels the ascent in his inner vessel, and when he feels a descent, it's joining the external, that from the first restriction it was empty of light. Then the surrounding light in the external vessel can't receive until it has a screen?

M. Laitman: Wait, wait, no. And in the ascent, what light did you have, internal?

Student: What is an ascent for him if he doesn't feel light? There's light that he doesn't feel, and he calls that an ascent.

M. Laitman: In what vessel is light clothed? I don't understand. Are we talking about the time of preparation? If we're talking about the time of preparation, we have a person, he has the desire to receive, this desire to receive is in order to receive, and he needs to gradually make all kinds of distinguishments, discernments. But between all his desires, is there a certain desire where light can clothe?

Student: I'm saying, it doesn't matter. In all the states we go through before the barrier, it's according to what we have in the inner light. It's not the same thing.

M. Laitman: Yes.

Student: So I'm also saying that the surrounding light, that's written here, you'll have to put a screen on that too. Then it can enter and be as if it's also inner light.

M. Laitman: And?

Student: So our work is specifically down that point, till the barrier.

M. Laitman: What you're saying is: I have a desire to receive, my desire to receive is without a screen, above the barrier, the surrounding light illuminates for me, this surrounding light will clothe me when I have a screen. So all my work is on such a screen in which the surrounding light will clothe me. Yes? No. I don't need to think that this surrounding light - meaning, certainly I think that I want to attain it, I'm drawn to it, but the correction is not according to that - certainly I long for this light to fill me and be in me. But the correction is when this light is not there, when the surrounding light departs. Do I fill myself with the light of faith in its place?

Student: But the light of faith, like you said, it’s…

M. Laitman: The light of faith illuminates for me, not just from the surrounding light. This light of faith illuminates me if I consider my relation with the Creator, that I have an attitude towards Him, not to receive from Him, but to the extent in which I long for Him.

Student: That's not the root of the screen?

M. Laitman: That's the root of the screen. My attitude, my relation to, as we say, the greatness of the goal, the greatness of the Creator, is the root of the screen. That too is in order to receive, but it's already the root for the screen. And when can I say that, yes, I have it? When I'm in the darkness, when the surrounding light is not illuminating. This surrounding light is not a light that corrects me. It's a light that illuminates for me from... It will become internal light. It's not the light of AB-SAG, we should put it that way.

Student: So the work, whether the surrounding light is there or not — so according to that, my relation to the Creator, if I think about it, that's the root to the screen, and then the barrier is the work?

M. Laitman: Yes. Specifically, at the time of darkness, a person sees that he's a beast, that he remains a beast. That means that from above he is not awakening the Adam in him. How can he himself make the Adam in himself to awaken to the Creator?

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:13:29) What work does a person have, if during the descent, during the darkness, most of the darkness comes from the environment, from the path, if he can't, doesn't get inspiration?

M. Laitman: Our ascents and descents, the way we count them, are not according to the true state, but rather the feeling in the desire to receive. It illuminates me — ah, today I'm in an ascent. It doesn't illuminate to me — oh, I'm in depression today, in a descent. Meaning, I examine according to how much I have in my belly or not, in my vessels of reception. And this is not an ascent and a descent, spiritually. It's an ascent and a descent, meaning how much I have in my pocket, in my vessels of reception? How can I really measure my ascent and descent? My ascent and descent can be measured only when it doesn't illuminate for me. Do I rise up to the Creator on my own? Meaning, not in order to receive from Him, but uplift myself because He is great in my eyes. Can I rise up to 10 grams, or 20 grams, or am I not capable whatsoever? That's the measurement. Meaning, the measurement cannot be when I'm receiving the abundance, because that cancels out the vessel. A measure can be only during darkness, if during the darkness I perform a restriction upon myself, and I say, I don't care whatsoever what's happening, as long as I don't want to be influenced by the presence of the light or a lack of it. I don't want to be influenced by that. I want to relate to the Creator in how He is, without it relating to me. If I'm capable, let's say, to deal with the states of darkness, this is as if I'm in a state in which I hold on to the restriction. That is, that I come to a state myself where I don't want it to illuminate for me. I don't want to travel, to walk on the path to the purpose of creation by the fuel that He's giving me. He's giving me light - so I go; He doesn't give me - I don't go. No, I want to go by my light. What's my light? That during the darkness, the goal will be important for me. And this will serve as my fuel. And the importance of the goal, I, myself, within me, can only develop. And specifically in the darkness.

Student: (01:16:35) But I don't feel darkness.

M. Laitman: That's why it's called faith. Do I feel good or not depends on whether I can go with the light of faith or not. If my light of faith will serve for me in place of the illumination that was from above, then I feel good. If this light of faith will not serve me and it's weak or lacks altogether, then I still... They say that the light of faith must be like the light that departed. If it's like that, if a person receives fuel from himself — what does he mean, from himself? A person is not a supplier of energy, but there's the importance of the goal towards the Creator. And then, from above, he receives the light of faith, the light of Hassadim. And the light of Hassadim fills him. He can live. This is already phase two. It's already the quality of Bina. If he's capable of this, well, if he has the quality of Bina, beyond that, it's just complete faith. That is, these are states that we go through, but we don't quite understand how they work. And also, all our states, these of ours, are in this desire to receive, but it's certainly preparation for true states. Meaning, what do we need to do, bottom line? You know, after all these explanations, we forget everything, besides one thing. One - we need to appreciate that you have, that you're given the feeling of darkness, that's already a sign that you're starting to receive an opportunity from above to develop the vessels. Today, we're now learning, in part two, we're studying — oh no, the records, yes? In part four. When is the vessel created? The expansion and the departure of the light leads to all the clashes there within, the descending, reflected light that beats the record, and all kinds of things. The departure of the light builds the Kli. And its filling, it has no filling. Ah, I feel like that, I am full. Discernments - there are none. In order to lead to discernments, we necessarily need the departure. Because during the time of the departure, you have the inner clashes between lights, and these clashes between lights give birth to the vessels. The descending and reflected light, and the light of the record — two lights which contradict one another, resist one another, and the general desire to receive feels this clash and friction between them - he receives the feeling called a Kli. Hence, the time of departure is the blessed time. It's the building of the vessels. It's impossible without it. The fact that we're scared, and we fall, and that we're afraid of those states, and feel ourselves truly sometimes worse than death, that's a feeling inside our beastliness. But in the spiritual Kli, this state must lead to an opportunity for an ascent. That is, discern within you two parts: your animal, your beast suffers - the soul must specifically uplift now. It is receiving an opportunity to awaken in faith and to receive the light of faith.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:20:45) What's the upliftment here?

M. Laitman: This upliftment, this ascent here, is in being aware and appreciating the greatness of the Creator. When can I say that He is great in my eyes? If I receive a bunch from Him, then certainly He is great. But when I don't receive from Him anything, and moreover, that I receive darkness from Him, then you should say, He's great. Meaning, then you won't be dependent on your desire to receive. To be great in the soul or to be greater in the body - these are two different things. Slowly, slowly, it'll go. Believe me, it will.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:21:36) What changes in the states, let's say, before the path and after you're on the path? According to what I understand, it's an awareness, it's the way you relate to the state. Sometimes it seems just like psychology, of changing your attitude, your relation.

M. Laitman: The initial years, after about six months, these are very confusing years. A person becomes very confused until these discernments are created in him with which he can somewhat deal with, sort into certain shelves and drawers — this to here, and this to there. It takes time. It takes years. Three, four, five first years, it's impossible to go through - to acquire a spiritual vessel is a different nature. Meaning, look how many people are suffering and laboring in order to acquire something from this world, in direct vessels of the desire to receive. What development of all the senses, and qualities, and desires needs to be, and what needs to be invested? And you want to receive a vessel that is not of this world?

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:23:29) What does it matter what he gets pleasure from? The pleasure is receiving it. So, what are you correcting by this?

M. Laitman: Do you hear the question? What does a person care what he's receiving pleasure from? I have a beast, a desire to receive, and this desire to receive enjoys from receiving. It enjoys from receiving, the desire to receive, and that's it. The light departs, not good. The light comes, yes, good. The desire to receive. In the desire to receive, there's the point in the heart. I want to develop it. In order to develop it, I can do this only through the light of faith, because it's a desire to bestow, it's a spark from the screen that I once had before the shattering of Adam HaRishon. What's the point in the heart? It's a spark that has fallen into the Klipot, into the shells. From this spark, as we learned, this is a part of reflected light; from reflected light that I had when I was in Adam HaRishon. Now, I need this part, this tiny spark, to inflate. How will I inflate it? By the greatness of the goal, by the greatness of the Creator. How will I do this? In relation with the whole other desire that is excited or not excited in me from the illumination from above. And at the time where it's not enthused by the illumination from above, then I can see what's going on with my point in the heart. Has it grown or not? Can I do something from within it or not? If the illumination from above departs, and I'm not capable of anything, then the point is a point. What is a point? A point is like in each, in everyone in the street. It's also not there, and that's it. And I just feel despair. Meaning, I operate only from the desire to receive. If, during the time that the desire to receive cannot give me anything, then I operate from that point, and in it I feel vitality. In it, I can feel the vitality in my point in the heart. Only in the state where I long for the Creator, meaning in the state of darkness.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:26:19) Why does the darkness affect my studies?

M. Laitman: Not darkness in the point. The darkness is in the general desire to receive. Well, it won't help. As many questions I answer, you know that all the questions are just like that, for the intellect. Whoever receives an answer to a question from within - receives.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:26:56) He wrote there in the beginning that a person has to reach despair when he can't reach greatness of the Creator. On the other hand, we say that only when a person really reaches despair, a true prayer can come out. So, how does that work out? As long as a person feels that he can keep going, so he won't reach despair. So, how do these things work out together? On one hand, you're not allowed to reach despair, on the other hand, you must reach despair in order to really pray.

M. Laitman: We're not allowed to reach despair, and we must reach despair. I am prohibited myself to cause reaching despair. That's called, it's not allowed to reach despair. We must reach despair? We must reach a state in which from above you're being clashed to such an extent that you despaired from your own forces, as it's written. And then one can bring forth a prayer. That can't all be done at once, like this. You see? Altogether, he wants to explain a few of the states that we go through before the barrier. He wrote five volumes. Our language is a dead language. It doesn't give us, we don't have the means. Only the light can. When it fills the vessel, it gives everything. That's called filling. For us, this filling is spread over intellectual filling, emotional, mental, a thousand things, and none of it is it. Meaning, the true filling of the desire to receive — net, receiving from the filling of the light — is the final answer. And this way, nothing will help us. You can go around and want to somewhat more and more attain - nothing will be there. Meaning, we seemingly want, through the multiplicity of external clothings, to attain the end inner filling. It doesn’t go that way. You can tell me a thousand years about some good food. If I didn't eat it, and I didn't enjoy it, if I truly didn't fill myself with it, all those words are not worth a thing. Later I can, according to the words that you're telling me, also say, you know what, I heard from him, oh boy, boy, this, this dish. And then I tell someone else, this someone else says to you, no, I heard from him that he heard from him that he ate it and it was… That's what we're doing all together in this world. You understand? So what is it worth? What comes to you?

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:30:20) In a logical way, there is a contradiction here. So, it's not logical.

M. Laitman: That's for sure, that there's a clash between the desire to receive and the desire to bestow. Hence we're always in misunderstanding, uncertainty. And we cannot... Baal HaSulam writes that every spiritual state, the problem in it is that it includes within it two contradicting things. Meaning, the clash to begin with, in nature exists. And he says, what is the real problem in us? If we're just in the desire to receive — still, vegetative, animal, where the speaking also, until he speaks, is not, is also animal, belongs to the animal — if I'm in that nature, then everything's fine. Yes, from the four phases of direct light that I'm studying — root, one, two, three — everything's arranged nicely. Phase four, when she begins, wonderful, immediately it has troubles and reaches a restriction. Before phase four there's no restriction, there's no desire of my own, nothing. I'm operated upon from above, the Creator gives me thoughts, drives, and desires, fears, anxieties, hormones, all kinds of things that I'm driven by, and I go and perform them like a puppet, like a true puppet, like a yo-yo. And I have no problem, there's no clash, I'm in the desire to receive, He activates me this way from above, and everything works fine. When the point in the heart begins to be in this desire to receive, this is already a messenger from that world, from beyond the barrier, from the desire to bestow, at which point a person becomes split, at which point a problem begins in it. Two things contradicted to one another: the spiritual nature and corporeal nature in the same subject, in that person. I's a true... it's on the way to explode, to go crazy. It's clear that it can't be together. That's why we're such poor things, you know, such poor things. And we need to understand, we have no choice, the Creator entered into us, inevitably, in all of us, in all of humanity, the desire to receive and desire to bestow together. And it won't help us, we must be in this split until we cover this split. So, the desire to receive will be also in order to bestow, like the second nature, like the spiritual nature. And this is — you're told that you have to reach the spiritual nature; you're not even asked about that. So, you will remain in this split until your desire to receive is made into desire to bestow. And this is where all these two, these types of nature: this nature of this world and of the spiritual one - then they will be back together as one. Only then we’ll have peace, calm, peace - only to that extent. That's it. So, you're saying that there's a certain clash. What a clash! This is the greatest clash of all. And until the final correction, this clash is actually in us. That's how it is.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:34:04) So, how can a person see, or humanity, that if a person is just suffering from psychological...

M. Laitman: There's no psychological suffering. There’re no psychological sufferings. He writes that all the created beings: still, vegetative and animal, and also the animal of man, his beastly body, the beastly soul, like a cow, with the soul of a cow, they all ascend and descend together with a person. It's as we learned from the four phases of direct light. We have root, one, two, three, and they all exist for the sake of phase four. So, it's the same. Root, one, two, three are still, vegetative, and animal, which exists for the sake of the speaking. That's it. You're learning everything from spirituality. Look above, and how much you know about this, you'll see that here, it's this against that. And there's no question here. So, what do you need to do? In us, seemingly, the first three, the initial three phases, are against phase four. We need to make it so it will — this will serve that.

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:35:28) He speaks of two states: of blessing and prayer. So, I don't understand, before the barrier, what's the purpose of the blessing, and what's the purpose of the prayer?

M. Laitman: Another time. No, no, this is a very... it's a subject that's very…

Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:35:52) The spark from the descending reflected light and then the colliding with the record and light of faith, is it all connected?

M. Laitman: No, what light of faith? We have, the descending reflected light meets the record in the vessel, and the spark emerges. And the descending reflected light enters the Kli, and the record emerges outwards, and the spark is the third thing that's born, that's the future vessel. So, what are you asking?

Student: Is there a connection between that vessel and the future light of faith?

M. Laitman: No, we're not talking yet about light of faith. What light of faith? We're talking about the lights, the records that exist within the vessel. The light of faith can only be in darkness. What does phase two say? I am ridding myself of light of Hochma. Phase two of the four phases of direct light: I'm relieving myself from the light of Hochma, I don't want it, I just want to be similar to the Creator. Meaning, the awareness of the host in phase one led phase one to a state where she says, I don't want to use my vessel of reception, I want to just feel the landlord, not what I'm receiving from Him. I want Him, and not what I deserve from Him. What comes to me from Him, I'm erasing now. I can't at once use this and that. Do you understand? This is what's happening to us. You're relating to a person where you can either give him or receive from him. You can't at once do both those actions. When you perform later an action in receiving in order to bestow, then you're performing two actions. That is only possible if you're doing such an opposite action, using the desire to receive. Phase two is not capable of doing this yet. Later, when she expresses her desire, and the truth, and she doesn't want to breach what the Creator is… what she's about to receive, but she does want to relate to Him and what she's receiving from Him. That's why phase two — her true expression is in Malchut, in the lower Hey; the first Hey in the lower Hey. But she's not capable of doing this at once. To begin with, she says about phase one, that's it. Phase one, I don't want to feel. That's it. If I want to relate to You, to Your personality, I am allowed to relate to what I'm receiving from You. I'm not receiving anything. I want to relate to You. “To You,” is the light of Hassadim. “To You” will be the attitude — I want to give you. So phase one and phase two are contradicted to one another. And then phase three makes some form of, not equivalence, but some kind of planning of how this is possible of doing. In phase four, it has a real desire upon phase root, whereas phase root returns once more to phase two. But phase two, which will be in phase four, be already receiving in order to bestow. Meaning, phase four with the screen and reflected light precisely expresses phase two. And then, there, there can be both reception and bestowal together. Therefore, in us, when a spark in the heart is put in us, meaning the desire to bestow, and we begin to live now split out of these two parts, yes, the desire to receive and desire to bestow. We have no choice. We must, as fast as possible, reach correction. To return back, we won't be given. We're given to forget a little. So a person, when he's given to forget, is willing to run away. At least he'll be in silence inside his desire to receive. Understand? Let me just live this way. And my animalistic self, I'll exist, and we're done. Leave me. Because this split is very hard to live with. And in truth, this correction is — despite reaching this correction — two things that are in peace between them. This is called, "the Creator will bless His people with might and bless them with peace." Meaning, these two kinds of nature, these two kinds of nature together. And again, we're now going to learn.

Kabala Medya

Kabala Medya

My LibrarySign in to like, save and subscribe to videos

Günlük Dersler21 юни 2026(Morning)Part 1 Rabash. What Is, “There Is No Blessing in That Which Is Counted,” in the Work?. 18 (1989) (22.05.2002)

Part 1 Rabash. What Is, “There Is No Blessing in That Which Is Counted,” in the Work?. 18 (1989) (22.05.2002)

Rabash. What Is, “There Is No Blessing in That Which Is Counted,” in the Work?. 18 (1989) (22.05.2002)

YüklemeSıkı durun

Kabala MedyaTelif Hakkı © 2003-2026 Bnei Baruch – Kabbalah L’Am Association, Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

My Library
Sign in to like, save and subscribe to videos

Günlük Dersler21 юни 2026(Morning)
Part 1 Rabash. What Is, “There Is No Blessing in That Which Is Counted,” in the Work?. 18 (1989) (22.05.2002)

Yükleme
Sıkı durun

Kabala Medya
Telif Hakkı © 2003-2026 Bnei Baruch – Kabbalah L’Am Association, Tüm Hakları Saklıdır