Part 2:

Rabash. Explanation of the Article, “Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah” (Tzimtzum Aleph)

Reading “Tzimtzum Aleph” (00:25)

1. S. (02:40) What does it mean that in spirituality there is a rule that every new form is considered a new discernment or new quality?

R. We don't have anything except for the source except for Ein Sof that's why every innovation every new discernment comes from Ein Sof. It’s a new form, a new picture that comes upon what was there before.

S. What does it mean on top of?

R. That was was there remains and what comes now is add it.

S. So who is he now?

R. What is revealed now?

S. What about what was before?

R. Remains too.

S. Who is he now, who is he?

R. A form that is revealed now from that same source that had previous form and now comes the next form.

S. Let's say here, there is a world of Ein Sof and afterwards comes the world of restrictions. So the created being feels, who is he now, he's restricted already, he performed the restriction.

R. Yes.

S. It's not an Ein Sof he is restricted in the Ein Sof?

R. Also Ein Sof remains and also what's revealed now the world of the restriction remains. Yup, every form is on its own.

S. It is like the more advanced form is always borned of the preceding form that cause and effect, so if here he decides to restrict himself that now he's restricted?

R. But it has nothing to do with what was before what was before remains and now it's restricted is restricted.

S. Iif it takes a decision to invert himself, to restrict himself?

R. He can't decide anything about the previous form.

S. That's clear, but when he advances, he makes a decision on moving forward changing his form to fit the light, so his form changes he now becomes restricted?

R. Correct, so upon his previous form that was there now comes a new form what he decided.

S. Why do they say as if he's previous form that is not lost it’s on top of it?

R. Yes, of course.

S. But he changed in his essence?

R. Now he decided to add to the previous form, no form disappears it all comes as an addition.

2. S. (06:05) What after the light departed from the vessel on the second Malchut seemingly then all the Partzufim and Ten Sefirot were created how specifically to the departure of light something was formed and not when the light was received?

R. We're still not speaking here but receiving the light and if so, so in a passive way that the light just expands inside the desire.

S. The desire that expands is its second Malchut this is the discernment of the feeling of the vessel with the light?

R. I don't understand you about the second Malchut.

S. He says here there are two discernments to notice first the light enters the vessel Malchut and then when it departed seemingly another Malchut was created.

R. Yes, restricted.

S. Yes restricted. I'm asking this Malchut is the discernment of the feeling of the light and the vessel and the light together?

R. You can say so.

3. S. (07:35) To continue the first question Malchut has both states the state of Ein Sof and the new state, what can she do with the previous stat? what does it give her the fact that it's still in her?

R. The state of Ein Sof I still didn't hear that it's in Malchut.

S. Now he says that the Malchut undergoes the process.

R. That the light feels all the reality?

S. The light feels all the reality and the Malchut performs a restriction it says it’s a new state, It says no discernment disappears only added to. So I'm asking what does it mean the Malchut has an additional state? What does the previous state give her? What can she do with it?

The previous state is in the next state meaning Malchut that is entirely filled with the light that is called light of Ein Sof afterwards upon it closed a Malchut which is restricted called the world of restriction, that’s it. two states.

S. Understand I'm asking what can Malchut do with its previous state? What does it give her? Why didn't she lose it?

R. Why is that important for us now?

S. Because it seems that in spirituality there are degrees that are build one on top of the other.

R. Correct.

S. And it seems like the results is always seemingly dependent only on the last degree so why do you need the previous degrees for?

R. There's no lack in spirituality all states remain and exist and never disappear.

S. It says that the beginning of first restriction where the Malchut said it doesn't want to receive in order to receive. How come Malchut that is all entirely to receive suddenly doesn't want to receive in order to receive, what happened?

R. According to the nature of the light that fills her.

S. What does it mean the light, it is always in bestowal throughout all the degrees down to this point bestowed?

R. But it came to the states where it bestowed Malchut with its own qualities and now she doesn't want to be a receiver it affected her and she changed she also wants to be as the light. Because the light is the upper one the first that belongs to the higher degree the moment the light starts bestowing upon something so it presses from its own on that one when he is affecting and then the discernment the receives it that is below the influence of the light she has no choice she receives his control.

S. Can we say the light influences Malchut, what is born there, a new records what new things born there in Malchut?

R. It is not written yet I don't know.

4. S. (11:08) The world of Ein Sof when she received everything does that correspond to Hochma that was receiving? Now the action of restriction corresponds is to the form that the Bina showed her?

R. No, why are you taking such things, what do you want to say by that?

S. Malchut seemingly does what was done before her as examples she now wants to advance toward bestowal seemingly to resemble the light.

R. Right.

S. So it says in ZA, it's a small face to receive a little bit in order to bestowand Malchut's purpose is to receive everything in order to later bestow. I'm saying to receive everything is to receive all the lights it's like Hochma received something now it started to perform actions in order to imitate Bina that wants to bestow?

R. No, why are you talking about, what discernment?

S. Talking about the restricting Malchut the one that performs restriction on the light on the filling that doesn't want to remain opposite from the quality of the light, received all the lights and felt being an opposite to the light and now she's taking this action to resemble the light that's why she restricts herself?

R. What are you talking about, what phase, what discernment?

S. Four, Malchut, Dalet ?

R. Four, so comes after three, so what phase three compel her to do?

S. Received a little bit of the light, little illumination of Hochma in order to bestow and she understood in the end that she wants it all.

R. That she wants it all.

S. That she wants everything because it is not the purpose of the creation to receive a little bit.

R. Ok, so now she will go and receive everything.

S. It's like in the four phases is like when Hochma received that form of reception is Hochma, so now I'm saying the world of restriction, the restriction she's making is already a new action, she wants to continue advancing after receiving everything, she wants to be in equivalence of form.

R. Yes.

S. Is it doing anything like the previous actions or is it all new that she relies on the actions that took place before her?

R. Malchut received the light that came to her from ZA, right? Say something otherwise I won't keep going.

S. If it's a result of what ZA went through.

R. Right so she received the light that came to her from ZA, receives it what happens next?

S. Were you saying that she received all the light of Ein Sof she received from ZA?

R. I didn't say that.

S. I understand it a little differently at the end of the third discernment phase three ZA she receives the new discernment where by in order to complete the purpose of creation she wants all the lights to be revealed inside the vessel.

R. Okay.

S. But inside there's a process where she is not doing just for nothing there's an intention behind it.

R. What?

S. She wants to reach equivalence of form with the light.

R. Right.

S. So I'm asking, did she get it from the example of the Bina wanted to do from the beginning?

R. Of course all the four phases work in her she wants to be included of them all.

5. S. (15:45) The shame that awakened and the Malchut and gave birth to the restriction is it already an intention towards equivalence of form in that shame?

R. Yes.

6. S. (16:00) Malchut of phase four receive the light of Ein Sof and beings to it's also called the world of Ein Sof then later it restricts the light in order to reach the source to resemble it, so it's not already Malchut of the phase four, it's beginning for the phase three?

R. That's called the world of restriction.

S. The world of restriction is higher than the world of Ein Sof seemingly Malchut of Ein Sof?

R. No, it comes as the result.

S. So there is in the light of Ein Sof that she receive there is a point that caused her to restrict herself?

R. Yes.

7. S. (16:56) He writes it after the restriction there was a recognition of four phases with more do we need. Why is there continuation, why is it only the beginning?

R. I don't understand the question.

S. If Malchut the restricted Malchut has now the recognition, the awareness of the four phases what else is needed in the creation?

R. But what does she want to get to?

S. To resemble the upper one that's the recognition of the four phases?

R. So what can she?

S. Having this awareness what does that mean this awareness?

R. When she restricts herself that she do something that she comes closer to the upper one?

S. She has awareness of the four phases that came out of the upper one?

R. So what?

S. Everything can be in it?

R. She received all the light of Ein Sof.

S. That's not written.

R. Ok, we will go over it.

8. S. (18:20) The restricting Malchut why by restricting herself and not receiving the light she becomes similar to the Creator what does it add to her?

R. She comes closer to the Creator by not receiving, according to the action she comes closer to the Creator.

9. S. (18:47) What is the characteristic of restricting in our work?

R. Also restriction when a person doesn't want to receive because by that he feels himself in lack of equivalence of form to the Creator.

10. S. (19:14) To continue how can there be the deficiency in state He and His Name is One?

R. What state He and His Name is One?

S. Phase four when it receives all the lights.

R. Phase four that receives all of the light, even if she receives the whole light, she receives it in equivalence of form?

S. He calls it He and His Name is One. It's the end of the discernment.

R. We have to read where you are taking this from.

R. Paragraph, ‘Hence, as we discerned that Hochma received and Bina repelled the Light, Malchut remained as she was in the state of the world of Ein Sof receiving all the Light and now we discern a new Malchut, which repels all the Light.’

We should know that the first state called Ein Sof was “He is One and His Name is one,” meaning that the Light and the Kli were one discernment. Only after the Tzimtzum was there a distinction of the four phases, or ten Sefirot, since the Light departed from them.

S. I'm asking about that state. What deficiency can there be in the state of ‘He is One and His Name is One’ that invites a new action, reflected light? Why not be satisfied with that state ‘He is One and His Name is One’, it sounds like a state of wholeness?

R. Why do you think that’s a state of wholeness?

S. Also a question, I guess. I know that afterwards a new creation comes to be equal to shame which propels the rest of the process. It's not written here, but?

R. Okay let's keep going.

11. R. (21:33) What does he say about the question? With this Tzimtzum, the Light departed from all ten Sefirot. This is perplexing since the Tzimtzum was on the reception in order to receive, which is Behina Dalet, which is Phase 4 and not on the rest of the Phases of the Behinot. What are our questions?

12. S. (22:22) The restriction that Malchut performs, is it also called reflected light?

R. No.

S. He writes though that she returned the light?

R. The fact that she returned the light is okay, but it's not reflected light. Reflected light is something that happens later in the Partzuf.

S. Question, so what brings the awareness of all the four phases, the ten Sefirot for that the light departed? What creates the awareness in all the remaining discernments?

R. What happens with the Malchut after the light departed?

R. Yes.

S. Maybe a different question. Malchut once it restricts itself, all the light is restricted from the Malchuliot, the plural of Malchut, and the other discernments and that's what creates that awareness of all the other discernments before it?

R. Malchut that restricts itself turns off the light in all ten Sefirot.

S. What makes the discernment about the four phases before it?

R. It is in all the discernment before it and if Malchut that is at the end of the Partzuf stops receiving she seemingly prevents any other sephirot from receiving.

S. Then there is a discernment between the light and the vessel, because previously he writes that they were one.

R. Let’s say that, yes.

Reading (24:30) “Question. With this Tzimtzum, the Light departed from all ten Sefirot. This is perplexing since the Tzimtzum was on…”

13. S. (26:18) He says that the light fills the vessel completely. When that happens there is no distinction between the light and the vessel. Then there is a state where the lights depart completely; there also there is no distinction. When is there a distinction in the vessel regarding what is in it, the Sefirot?

R. I don't understand.

S. He says that when the light fills the vessels completely, entirely, there is no distinction between the vessel and the light. Then there is a restriction and there is darkness in the vessel. You said it turned off all the Sefirot. The question is when in the vessel is there a distinction about the Sefirot.

R. That's after there are entrances and exits from the Sefirot. It is not yet, not now.

14. S. (27:17) He says that Malchut is the first vessel. Up until then, it is only a preparation for the 10 Sefirot. Then there is a departure of the light from the 10 Sefirot. The first upper nine are not vessels, but on the other hand they are considered Sefirot and they are called vessels. Yet, you say that the root is Keter. Above Malchut, the first upper nine above Malchut, if they are not vessels as he writes here but only preparation..

R. Of course, it is not vessels.

S. So why do they attach this Sefirot to it? Aren’t Sefirot vessels?

R. No. The vessel is Malchut. The Sefirot are the ways the light appears towards Malchut. When Malchut receives in her reflected light, those lights in the first nine, then she performs a coupling upon them and a reception of light.

15. S. (28:37) Can you explain a bit more about the difference between the vessel and Sefirot it preceded?

R. Where are we talking? 10 Sefirot that are connected between them in the vessel of Malchut, that is called a vessel.

S. Why the restriction give Malchut an awareness of its 10 Sefirot? What does it mean that it recognizes, it's aware of its’ 10 Sefitor?

R. She knows the 10 Sefirot by restricting herself, she doesn’t want to receive. By this she limits the development of the light in the first nine. Then as much as she equalizes to those first nine in order to bestow, she feels as much as they receive.

S. So after she's born, Malchut, she attained her causes. What is the importance of attaining her causes?

R. That's called that she receives them.

S. How does that influence her?

R. They all together become a Parzuf.

S. Meaning that gives her an opportunity.

R. A place to reveal the light.

S. That gives her an opportunity to bestow?

R. Yes. You could say that.

16. S. (30:16) When the Malchut receives and she discerns the first 10 Sefirot, meaning she discerns the different lights. Does Malchut itself have a light or is the illumination only in the 9?

R. Reflected light.

S. I didn't get it?

R. The fact that she performs reflected light on the first 9, that is her light.

17. S. (30:54) What is this independence that the last Phase suddenly has. Suddenly she’s independent, she can make calculations, receiving, not receiving, I'm using, not, I’m developing into something else. Where does she get this independence? Because all the first discernments, our qualities work by a certain linked chain of events that life influences them, there is a certain influence, a certain development. Suddenly the last Phase comes and she has a certain degree of independence. She can make calculations. What causes her, what creates that distinction between the last Sefira and the rest of the Sefirot that come before?

R. Malchut is entirely receiving; it has no other quality either to receive or not. By choosing not to receive, she starts being connected to the first 9. Not about what is in them, but what they want to bring her. By this she uplifts above herself to the first 9?

S. The upper nine have no choice; they will always pass everything to Malchut?

R. Let's say so.

S. So how come the Malchut has the ability to say if I receive or don’t receive?

R. Because she's the will to receive, she has nothing but that.

S. I'm not able to formulate the question. I’m trying to understand how suddenly they had nine discernments that worked a certain way and suddenly a discernment came out of them that works a completely different way.

R. Because in those nine discernments there's something of their own and in Malchut there is nothing.

18. S. (33:17) Why ZA couldn't simply receive the light in order to bestow?

R. There is no such possibility to receive in order to bestow. ZA doesn't have that ability.

S. It received after all, it was a stage of compromise. It received some of the light in order to bestow?

R. Yes. I cannot answer you about that now. Soon.

19. S. (34:09) It says here, three discernments, the first discernments are not vessels but only cause of the order of development at the end of which the vessel has one. We read that in the light of Ein Sof, there's one light that suddenly this will to receive is born of so it's an ideal state What happened there? That's the creation, there's some mutual desire, what happened in the desire that was created in the will to receive and the separation started what happened at the end?

R. How do you know how to turn things around?

S. Because he writes that everything was fine, and suddenly there was a vessel with a will to receive who demanded it? The Creator wanted it ? There were different vessels? What was going on there? It's not clear. If you can explain that?

R. I don't know how to explain that.

S. It was once said that they want to remove the bread of shame and then the vessel was created, is there something to that?

R. Yes, something.

S. Can you open it up a little bit? Elaborate?

R. Can you ask in a clear manner, in one sentence. Rephrase your question.

S. What is the reason that suddenly they separated? They were seemingly at equivalence of form in the vessel and suddenly this desire was created to create a vessel with the will to receive. What happened there?

R. The vessel with the will to receive developed from the discernment from the root 1 2 3 4. That's how we are constantly speaking of the development of the vessel. The vessel on the way to its development reveals the light that fills her and in some way agrees with it or not, wants is or not and so on, until it reaches the last phase. What are you asking about that?

S. I am asking, we read before that everything was in wholeness and suddenly from somewhere there was a desire to create a vessel that will begin to have a will to receive because it was not before everything. Seemingly beautiful, perfect and whole and suddenly there was born a desire to receive. Seemingly from this beauty and wholeness came the will to receive. What was the reason that suddenly there was a will to receive? What's the reason to build a vessel? Everything was seemingly perfect. There was one light,white and suddenly this came about. What's the reason for that?

R. Are you done?

20. S. (37:56) Is this process of restricting the lights of circumcision to become a man?

R. Yes.

S. When Malchut restricted the light, what happened to the rest of the Sefirot. Does this mean that everything stops until this correction begins to have an interaction with the Creator to sayI can I only take this much and then the entire lights begin to activate? Is that how it works?

R. Yes of course, Machut is in an interaction with the Creator and the Sefirot in the middle between Keter and Malchut are the only ones connecting between Keter and Malchut and Malchui to Keter.

21. S. (39:12) I want to make sure I understand the restriction. Is there a restriction when I'm able to stop receiving from myself and turn the receiving into another to bestow otherwise it's not a restriction correct?

R. Yes. No, I don't know what, otherwise it is not a restriction. There is a restriction then there is reception in order to receive or reception in order to bestow.

S. In other words if I restrict and it is just for myself reception, that is not a restriction?

R. Yes.

22. S. (40:14) I heard something along the lines that by restricting herself she receives what the first nine wants to pass down to her. What do they want to pass down to her? but only the restriction allows her to receive?

R. Whatever they receive from Keter from phase zero, the root.

S. What did they receive?

R. The upper light. The Creator's attitude toward them.

S. Before Malchut restricts herself she cannot receive it from the upper nine?

R. She can but then she won't feel what she is receiving.

S. The restriction allows her to receive from the upper nine that something that she won't be able to receive otherwise?

R. Yes.

S. What is she receiving?

R. Sharing what the host gives them. Why? Because he does not want to receive? He doesn't want to do a favor for the host? In a different way, he won't be able to enter that equivalence with the host with mutual bestowal.

23. S. (41:42) Here's a little different because he described here that only after the restriction there was awareness because first she was receiving. In not like with the host, and then you stop yourself from receiving. He says at the beginning the expansion of the light and its departure qualifies the vessel for his role. Here specifically from the expansion from the restriction it creates an awareness of the actions that took place before her?

R. What is the intention of the host? The landlord?

S. So that is it, Meaning that when the light departs it begins to have discernments about what happened?

R. Now she starts getting different discernments. The host doesn't just want to blow her up and fill her up but by this He has an intention which is a bit higher.

S. The vessel qualifies for its role means that it begins to detect the intention of the host and the feeling?

R. Yes, the host has the opportunity to enter him, to peak there and afterwards maybe change her ways.

24. S. (43:09) In Phase two the light of Hassadim was born, in Phase four when she receives all the light for herself she receives the light of Hochma and the light of Hassadim together and then when the light departed she discovered she was empty but was there any of the light of the light of Hassadim left in that emptiness?

R. She performed a restriction in the complete way.

S. Before the restriction when the light departed and then she made the restriction so before the restriction?

R. No it can't be that the restriction happened after the departure of the lights.

S. Does it happen throughout?

R. Before the light departed there was a restriction and then the light departed.

25. S. (44:10) When the host gives her an opportunity to enter Him,to peek into Him what does she find there?

R. Only the intention of love.

26. S. (44:24) Before the restriction phase 4 was receiving her to receive but the process of development is from the feeling of the giver. What does she feel from the giver in practice? That She doesn't feel that He enjoys her reception, what does she feel?

R. She feels a little love.

S. She feels his love but she doesn't feel his feedback following reception?

R. Why? Where are you taking this from?

S. I am trying to understand that before the restriction there's an intention. She is receiving because she feels the love of the Creator and she wants to bring contentment or not?

R. Yes of course otherwise she wouldn't perform the restriction.

S. What's the difference between the vessels of Hassidim and the intention to delight Him?

R. She wants to bring joy to the Creator just as she reveals that He wants to bring joy to her. From all of her vessel, that's why she restricts herself.

S. Before the restriction when she discovers when she feels all His love, she feels that she also the delights Him?

R. Yes.

S. Why does she decide to restrict? Why should there be shame if she's giving Him such pleasure?

R. By that she erases herself. That's why on behalf of the Creator it is supposedly important to Him whether she restricts himself or not or she receives in order to receive or not for Him the main things that she receives.

S. When she restricts herself what is the ladder that the Creator offers her in order to receive again? How can he make himself accessible so she can receive again?

R. Because after the restriction she already puts herself with intentions before her actions. Then she doesn't receive in order to bestow but in order to bestow, then she receives.

27. S. (47:17) We say that the first restriction was never canceled. If it won't be canceled, how will we come back to the world of Ein Sof?

R. The first restriction is never canceled and above the restriction we perform actions in order to bestow.

28. S. (47:47) Where did Malchut get the resources to perform the restriction? Is this something that the Creator inserted into her this ability? or from somewhere? Where does she get his ability to perform a Tzimztum ?

R. Malchut can't perform a restriction because she feels her state,her attitude, her relationship to the upper light to receive it in order to receive. Her inability to receive in order to bestow and understand her attitude toward the Creator, towards that.

29. S. (48:42) How is it that a primitive will to receive can fill the giver?

R. It's not a primitive will to receive. It can feel the source of his reception where it received from and because it has the first upper nine before it, it comes to a state when he turns to it already all the intentions and discernments of the bestower are rooted in Him and he is using it.

S. There's I will receive, next to it there's the will to feel the giver? It's two things.

R. Before it, there's a desire to feel the giver.

S. Out of these two things how can you achieve your equivalence of form out of one?

R. No, his desire was created as a result of the influence of the bestower to receive in all of his upper nine. Hence the desire to receive in the Malchut is the result of the upper nine.

S. It starts with the second restriction iit already starts feeling that desire to bestow before Malchut?

R. Yes.

S. It starts responding he starts bringing something out of himself meaning there's another additional ability?

R. No, I can't perform any action before he completes its development from above down. He cannot.

30. S. (50:37) Light is pleasure, meaning there are nine types of pleasure.that is accepted and one type of pleasure that is flawed that the created being cannot use. Can we say that?

R. Okay.

S. When Malchut restricts herself ,if she receives she cannot feel anything except for the pleasure filling her. The restriction lets her feel the pleasure of the nine above her?

R. Yes.

S. And from not fill them?

R. No.

S. Atually we are speaking about pleasure that one part allows the other part or blocks the other part if there is no restriction?

R. Yes and

S. Where is the Creator in this? It's all the created being within itself. Malchut  to the Sefirot above her, the Sefirot to Malchut . We say we want to give contentment to the Creator, so where is the Creator  here if all the parts of the created being?

R. The first nine.

S. Malchut released the first nine as the Creator?

R. Yes.

31. S. (52:04) We said that when Malchut receives everything she feels that the Creator enjoys her receiving. It's not written that there's a dilemma here. I expected it to be a very dilemma before the restriction because she doesn't feel the Creator enjoying by her receiving. How can it be a self decision that she will see that she harms the Creator in this?

R. Yes, that's why he says that the restriction is the most severe thing that there can be.

S. Why is the shame here stronger for them than bestowing to the Creator by receiving?  Why is it stronger?

R. Again.

S. Why is the feeling of shame that is revealed in her stronger than her need to bestowl to the Creator that by that she decides to restrict herself?

R. Specifically because she wants to bestow contentment to the Creator.

S. But does she feel that she's doing it by receiving? She already feels it, that's what we said?

R. It did not receive it in order to bestow.

S. Right but for the Creator it is not important whether she received in order to bestow if she receives .

R. But she can't feel it.

S. So she doesn't feel the Creator pleasure?

R. No, it's like a baby that she still doesn't feel it. The baby is not exchanging things with his mother yet.

32. S. ( 53:58) About the revelation that the Creator has an intention of Love towards her, that revelation that He has an intention towards her, does that come only after she restricts herself or is there something come before she restricts herself and causes it?

R. Correct question. The Creator who's caring for Malchut He fills her with all his attitudes and desires and when does she discover his attitude towards her completely which will cause her restriction and this happened only in the very last stages

S. And then she feels that he has an intentional love toward her?

R. Not only love, absolute love.

S. Does this bring her to decide on restriction?

R. Yes.

S. Now she feels she \estricted herself by this she enters a deeper interaction with Him? She reveals more things in Him that she couldn't reveal before?

R. Let's say.

S. What are they?

R. I cannot say. I think it's called the secrets of Torah.

33. S. (55:46) Can we say that the root of the restriction is a state where the second phase?

R. Yes.

S. Because it's a desire to resemble the action of the Creator?

R. Yes.

32. S. (56:18) I heard that during the lesson that the vessel Malchut same and the 10 Seifirot connected between them in Malchut is the vessel and we said that the first nine are old discernments or stages of development of what? Because it can't be the light, the light is in complete rest and doesn't develop and the Malchut didn't receive yet, so who are the first nine? and how to relate to them are discernments in the light in complete stillness or is the vessel that receive? Are the four faces retroactive discernment in Malchut?

R. We shouldn't make it so difficult, it's simply a wrapper for the light.

S. Who caused it that way? Malchut after she received it? What are the first nine actually? Is it discernmenSeifotrtt in direct light or Malchut?

R. The first nine are those Seifirot, those discernments where the light clothes in order to come and illustrates and builds the Malchut for itself.

S. Who revealed the first nine?

R. Malchut.

S. When does that happen? After she receives and is restricted?

R. When they arrive to her, when they come to her this Sefirot. When they reach her.

33. S. (57:58) Can we say that in Malchut when she was restricts herself, the light ended the action and that the action from now is the response in relation to the light?

R. Relatively.

S, The restriction she felt the Creator's attitude and now she feels their reaction?

R. The reaction.

34. S. (58:31) I think I understand but just to make sure. Between Machut of Ein Sof and restricted Malchut so I thought that like in the shattering, the light touches it and there's a restriction and shame and I now I understand that this her choice she did it from her own choice so later a stage.So what happens from the moment that Malchut of EinSof of restricted in Malchut is not instantaneously the shame and the restriction?

R. Yes. First shame then restriction.

S. But is this instantaneous because in the shattering the moment the light touches it shattered. Here it seems that she's filling herself and there's no later stage. I know there's no time but….?

R. Yes, there is a reaction.

35. S. (01:00:01) Malchut of Phase 4, before receiving the light of Ein Sof, she feels emptiness.

R. Yes.

S. After receiving the light of Ein Sof she feels the light of love?

R. Yes.

S. That makes her search for the source of love and causes a restriction?

R. Yes.

S. Can you say it's like Ari said, Taste and see that the Lord is good? Is that a state?

R. You are not speaking from the discernments that are before the restrictions and the corrections with the screen that you want to talk about.

S. So, she couldn't perform the restriction on her own, she did it with the help of the light.

R. Yes.

S. She's looking for the source of the light?

R. Yes, the host.

S. After the host is revealed so she restricts herself again? She doesn't want to receive the light because the connection with the host is more precious than the filling?

R. Yes.

S. That brings a different reality for her?

R. Yes. So, we are done and what do we have now?