Morning Lesson March 20, 2023

Transcription is made from simultaneous translation which leaves a possibility for differences in the audio.

Part 2:

Connecting the World in the Last Generation - Selected Excerpts from the Sources. #13

Reading Excerpt #13 (0:13) "The benefit of each and every person…"

1.S. (1:47) The system isn't really clear and the individual and the collective because he says on one hand the individual has no freedom because he's like a cogwheel in a machine, on the other hand, that collective is built of individuals and each individual damages the whole system. So how does that work?

R. The complete system that's how it should be. Everyone depends on everyone and there's a matter of a majority, the collective and the individual, the individual and the collective, and all these things they have to work together in the complete whole system. And it cannot be only other than the final correction and on the way to the final correction, we will always have problems as we feel on ourselves and the entire world. And all of this is to reveal the imbalance in the system and thus advance. Because otherwise, we will never be able to get the balance, the completeness.

S. What starts the process, connecting the individual or the individual and the collective? What is the result?

R. Individual collective and collective individual and this is how it works.

S. I don't understand. The collective is first or the individual first?

R. The first is the collective but the collective for now is in the individual. That there is no more than the individual and then the individual as it expands and multiplies and breaks into pieces and begins to work on the correction of each and every part. Then he begins to be reassembled into the collective.

S. This system isn't, I can't grasp it, this integralness in it. What are we lacking in order to be able to comprehend this?

R. Our brain isn't integral.

S. So what's the matter here?

R. It will not help us. We will not be able to make such a calculation in our brain that one plus one will equal.

S. Why?

R. Because it's incorrect, it's the corporeal mathematics and not spiritual.

S. What's in corporeal math that's not in a spiritual?

R. That the individual and the collective are equal.

S. So they're equal? So there's no beginning to this formula between the individual and the collective and the collective and the individual?

R. Yes.

2. S. (05:12) What is the benefit of the collective, who determines that?

R. The benefit of the collective is a state that will be in the final correction. Because before that, you need to balance the collective.

S. Meaning we have no reason to look at the reality and the benefit of the collective and whether people are working for it or not?

R. No no, it's like you would want to make a order in the world right now, the egoistic world of ours. You will not get anything either because the approach will not be the right approach.

3. S. (06:04) We don't value the evil in every person, but according to the damage he inflicts in the collective and not. Can you explain this? I don't understand it at all? What I have to measure the evil in each and every person or appreciate it?

R. Why do you read it like this?

S. Look at what he says, we have to measure the evil, appreciate the evil in every person, only according to the harm he inflicts on one in general?

R. Stop mentioning your work. We see them right now in the streets.

S. I want to understand this sentence, can you explain it?

R. That we need to value the benefit or the harm only in relation to the collective.

S. So what does it mean to appreciate the measure of evil?

R. The measure of good or bad. This is how we appreciate it.

S. He says it’s clear.

R. So what?

S. Why does he say that we don't value the evil in every person?

R. Because the main thing is what is happening to the collective.

S. I need to appreciate a person that is evil, that he is acting in an evil way?

R. No, rather I need to calculate how much evil he is doing in relation to the collective and maybe his evil turns into good.

S. So I have to see the evil in him and value it, and that's what's revealed?

R. Okay.

4. S. (08:04) I see that there is no compensation for the harm done to the society by the individual. How do I understand this?

R. No, we can't, this is what they say we can’t. Only according to the measure that he causes to the collective, to the general of the society and not privately personally to something or someone.

Reading Excerpt #14 (08:50) "In our generation…"

5. S. (10:37) It's scary to ask this question, but it's written here of the benefit of a certain country. We are working on building a benefit of a certain Society of Bnei Baruch. So what about the rest of the world?

R. What do you mean about another world?

S. Here it's written that it's impossible to build a good of a certain society. So what are we doing now? We're developing the benefit of a certain group, let's say Bnei Baruch?

R. No no, we tested on ourselves the benefit of the whole world.

6. S. (11:45) What's the benefit of the whole world?

R. The benefit of the whole world is that according to the wisdom of Kabbalah, everyone can connect, unite, and feel themselves in complete correction, in complete joy of the purpose of creation. To reveal the very reason why they appeared in this world, that they have attained it.

S. What does it mean attained?

R. That they received it, they revealed it.

S. Meaning man can reveal what he was created for only to the extent that he works for the benefit of the whole world?

R. Yes, of course.

S. How can a person aim himself that I live and I'm working for the whole world?

R. That question will direct him and aim him. From this question begins the spiritual ascent, the spiritual revelation, why do I exist?

S. But this question doesn't usually bring me to an understanding that I have to work for the whole world? I want to reveal the Creator.

R. No, not the entire world, you need to work to reveal for yourself the purpose of your creation, your own creation.

S. And where in this purpose is the work for the whole world?

R. It's connected one in the other, when you work for the benefit of the whole world, you elevate yourself to the degree of the Creator.

7. S. (13:49) We say that there's a benefit for society or damage for society. But what is a neutral state that I don't do good or bad? How do we determine such a thing? How do you work with it?

R. Such a state practically does not exist. We always progress towards the purpose of creation either on the good path or on the bad, but still towards the purpose of creation.

8. S. (14:42) There's a global balanced reality that's beyond our attainment, and there's my reality that I live in. Do I have to reach balance in my reality in order to understand my true work?

R. Yes, yes of course. To the degree that you are corrected, you can feel the external reality as corrected.

S. Then I can understand as much as I harm or?

R. Yes, of course.

9. S. (15:33) He writes that a person supposedly is dependent on the benefit, the good of the world and I understand it. On the other hand, we see in reality that people build themselves over a destruction of other people, that their loss is their benefit?

R. So what?

S. So how do you explain this? If I see that I'm gaining from someone's loss and not from their peace?

R. We will need to reveal this, what is it exactly the construction of reality and what is the destruction of reality, what do we benefit from? And what do we lose from? This is still ahead of us.

10. S. (16:46) You said that we check this method upon ourselves of the benefit of the collective, and I see that in the ten, when we reveal good or bad, so the annulment of one friend raises the whole ten to the benefit of the whole collective. That it's enough that one friend is expressing her annulment it raises the whole ten from hatred to the right state. How do we implement it in the whole world? Is there such a possibility?

R. Clear, clear. Apparently there is, I am also still not aware of it but it should come along and reveal itself.

11. S. (17:49) It's written that in our time we are already connected. The countries are connected and supplying their needs for life like individuals and their families. In a corrected state, will the relationships between countries be altruistic and bestowing?

R. Of course. Otherwise, what is it called the general correction? What is this question?

12. S. (18:36) According to what we are speaking about, we heard from you in the Congress that we should connect more between tens, and we have a deficiency not only in Kiev, but also in other groups in the Ukraine. That we should connect the Ukraine vessel, we want to have a routine of meetings between tens that the Ukrainian vessel will develop and grow and connect stronger. So, we know that the connection with the right intention, actually solves problems that we see around us. That it does good for the nation and the whole world, we heard it many times. So, is there a way to connect these actions we are doing? I don't even know how to ask it correctly. Would it be a right direction that such meetings and connections in the Ukrainian vessel, that we're going to connect so that it solves our problems that we see around us in the world?

R. Certainly. I welcome it, I welcome it. If this is to bring all of the nations into one whole, then certainly these meetings are very beneficial. Yes.

13 S. (20:30) Why is it so difficult to even depict what the corrected world is? It's always a dead end?

R. Yes it's not simple, this is really very very not simple, difficult even. Because in this, you need to connect many systems that exist in contradiction to one another. And it's like the systems in the human body. How much there are many many systems and all are acting in different ways and purposes. And in the end, the connection between them brings the system to life, to peace and wholeness. It's not simple, it's very challenging, and as much as the systems are more intricate, in the human body. then it’s hard for us to understand it. Where it speaks about the connection of our life and spiritual life, the transition between the two worlds, we can't begin to speak, because we don't have words to describe this transition. How we can sense it, feel it, be connected to it, but we will arrive at it we'll get to it.

14. S. (22:42) To summarize, can we say that by us working and correcting ourselves we're correcting the world in our eyes?

R. Yes, for sure.

15. S. (23:00) In the final system, are their connections dynamically where the tens dynamically interact? It's like a living organism?

R. I didn’t understand, again?

S. Biological systems like the organ system, everything interacts dynamically, they constantly change connections and the ideal balances that everything is in harmony?

R. Yes, certainly this is so, and this is the outcome as it is connected to one another. Okay we'll continue, at the end you will receive a full knowledge and sensation and an entrance to the entire world of connection of all of its parts to one integral form.