The transcript has been transcribed and edited from English simultaneous interpretation, thus there may be potential semantic inaccuracies within it.
Daily Lesson (Morning), July 26, 2024.
Part 1: Baal HaSulam. Letter Number 10
Reader: (00:00) We are reading Letter Number 10 of Baal HaSulam. You can find it in the Study Materials tab in the Arvut system. You can also send questions. If you ask a question in the study hall, make sure you have a microphone, hold it close to your mouth and ask loud and clearly. You can also send questions live through the sites and the Arvut system.
Reader: (00:33) Letter 10 21 Tevet, January 17, 1925, Warsaw
To the disciples, may the Lord be upon them:
... I terribly regret the dwindling organs that external circumstances overcame them from joining you. May the Creator give them strength so they can join us, and the Creator will be with them.
I understand that you are not engaged in unifications of mind and heart as I would like you to. Still, do what you can, and the salvation of the Lord is as the blink of an eye. The most important thing before you today is the unity of friends. Exert in that more and more, for it can recompense for all the faults.
It is said, “An exiled disciple, his Rav [teacher] is exiled with him.” This was perplexing to our sages, for how can there be slandering in the Torah and work of the disciple to the point of expelling him from the domain of the Creator, especially once he is clung to a true teacher? They explained that when the disciple descends, it seems to him that the Rav has descended, too. And because it is so, it really is so, meaning that he can enjoy his Rav only to the extent that he assumes in his heart. Therefore, all he has is a low and inferior Rav, as much as he values him. Thus, his Rav is exiled with him.
The exile and enslavement in Egypt begin with the words, “And a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.” That is, a new ruling appeared in the minds of each and every one, a newly made ruling, since they fell from their previous degree. We have said that “an exiled disciple, his Rav [teacher] is exiled with him.” Thus, clearly, they did not know Joseph. In other words, they attained him only to the extent that they valued him in their hearts.
Therefore, they depicted the image of Joseph as they themselves were. Because of it, they did not know Joseph and the enslavement began. Otherwise, the righteous would certainly protect them and exile or enslavement would not be depicted to them at all.
Their enslavement in Homer [mortar/plaster] and Levenim [“bricks,” as well as “white”] is explained: Mortar is the iniquity of the Hamor [donkey] by which one is sentenced for the thought. The bricks [also “white”] are the repentance, when they are granted upper mercies and temporarily obtain upper light from the faith of the holy fathers and are whitened from their iniquities. However, it was not permanent, and because of it, they were incarnating and coming into every work of the field, meaning continuation of hard work that concerns the rest of the Mitzvot [commandments].
Our sages said, “The intermediate, both judge them.” This is why that Klipa [shell/peel] is called Pharaoh, with the letters Peh-Hey Reish-Ayin [initials of Peh Ra (bad mouth)]. That is, the Malchut in Mochin is called Peh [mouth], meaning it is a resolution and consent not to break His word, and all that comes out of His mouth will be done.
In the exile in Egypt, the ruling was that of the above-mentioned bad mouth, and they returned to evil. Thus, although they were rewarded with some upper illumination from the first nine, it could not be
absorbed in the Guf [body] because of the bad mouth, the opposite of “Peh of Kedusha [holiness].” That is, the back of the neck was blocking the abundance that comes down from the Rosh [head], and sucked out all the abundance that began to come down for Israel. This is why no slave could escape Egypt, since Pharaoh put a great charm over the openings of Egypt, as our sages said.
By this we understand the verse, “And I know that the king of Egypt would not let you go, except by a mighty hand.” Through Moses, His servant, the Creator announced that no mighty hand or powers in the world would help with this evil Klipa as it surrenders only to the Creator. This is the meaning of “I and not a messenger,” and the meaning of “And I will put forth My hand and strike Egypt... And I will grant this people favor in the eyes of the Egyptians…”
Now we shall interpret the enunciation of redemption and Moses’ mission. It is written, “And Moses answered and said, ‘But they will not believe me’... for they will say, ‘The Lord did not appear to you.’” Interpretation: Because the mouth of Kedusha was in exile, as in, “for I am slow of speech and slow of tongue,” Moses, the faithful shepherd, argued before the Creator, “But they will not believe me.” Even if I tie Israel to me and bring down some bestowal for them, the Klipa of Pharaoh sucks it out and robs it from them. And although they are attached to me, they will still not listen to me. That is, while the Klipa of Pharaoh has dominion, and a mouth and speech in the exile, still, if they believed in the faithful shepherd properly, the children of Israel would be able to listen to Moses, who is above the mouth and speech. If they strengthened themselves in that, they would certainly be saved from the Klipa of Pharaoh.
This is what Moses, the faithful shepherd, complained about to the Creator, “They will say, ‘The Lord did not appear to you,’” as explained above, “And a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.” Upon their descent into matter [substance], they will also deny the greatness of Moses, the faithful shepherd, so how was it possible for Moses to redeem them from that evil and strong Klipa?
Therefore, the Creator gave Moses three signs to show to the children of Israel and taught him to arrange these signs before them one at a time. The Creator also promised him that He would help him from above so he can show it to them. After the children of Israel accept these signs from him, they will come to listen to Moses, and then he will be able to redeem them from that bitter exile.
Now I will explain the three signs. The first sign is the turning of the staff into a serpent, and the serpent into a staff. The second sign is that by taking out his hand not from his bosom, it was as leprous as snow. And when he took out his hand from his bosom, it returned to be as his flesh. The third sign is that by spilling the water of the Nile on the land it turned into blood.
Now I will interpret how He showed them to Israel. In the hand of the redeemer was a staff, which is the faithful shepherd. He is holding the staff to steer the heart of Israel to their father in heaven. If he throws it to the ground, it means that the children of Israel are taking His staff to do with it as they wish (Artza [to the ground] is like Ratzon [desire]). “And it turned into a serpent” means that their sin seemed to them like animals.
Before they approached his staff, their sin was considered still. After they brought themselves to his staff, it became an actual serpent until “And Moses fled from it” (according to what Israel valued themselves, as in “Who did not know Joseph”).
Subsequently, when Moses came to save them from the serpent’s bite, he gripped the serpent by its tail and not by its head because when a false redeemer comes to save Israel, he grips the serpent by its head, to break the serpent’s head, as so is the way of all snake-catchers.
But a true redeemer grabs it specifically by its tail (according to the secret that that serpent bends its head and strikes with its tail, which I already interpreted for you), “And it became a staff in his hand,” for then it really works in their hearts to turn them to the side of merit. And once the children of Israel receive that sign, the Creator gives him permission and authority to show them the second sign.
I have already interpreted for you the words of our sages, “‘Will sacrifice him to His will.’ How so? He is forced until he says, ‘I want.’” This is so because when discussing the thought, the filth of the serpent will be corrected through the offering that atones for the thought.
Yet, making the offering should be with love and fear, and one who needs a sacrifice can toil over fear, but not over love, so the offering is disqualified for lack of love. Our sages say about that that He—the Creator—is forced, as in “My sons defeated Me,” for the Zivug of one who works out of fear is called “forced.” Until the Creator says and reveals to him His will, and tells him, “I want” this work. Then it becomes apparent that there was no coercion to begin with, but an actual Zivug with love and friendship.
This is the meaning of “She opens her mouth in wisdom, and the teaching of mercy is on her tongue.” In the opening of the mouth, upper Hochma appears because at that time, when the Klipa of “bad mouth” parts from the Kedusha, the “mouth of Kedusha” comes out. This is the meaning of opening the mouth wide, and there are no more harm doers to break his word since “He who knows the mysteries testifies about him that he will not return to folly.” Promptly, he is rewarded with upper Hochma because the disclosure of law and judgment always come together. This is the meaning of “She opens her mouth in wisdom.”
And once he has reached the disclosure of Hochma, with which he was rewarded only through his prior labor in his Zivugim [couplings], coercively, it turns out that were it not for the tongue of Nukva, in which there is the power of labor, he would not have been rewarded with anything. Thus, it becomes apparent that to begin with, even the forced Zivugim were actually Zivugim of love and empathy. This is the meaning of “and the teaching of mercy is on her tongue,” specifically “on her tongue,” and not in another tongue.
Let us return to our topic that the first sign—that by Moses gripping its tail, it turned into a staff in his hand. This is the meaning of “repentance from fear,” as in “She opens her mouth in wisdom,” that from the time it is established as a staff—and the Klipa is sent away and does not return—begins the root of disclosure of upper Hochma.
The meaning of the second sign is a root for repentance from love. When he brought his hand into his bosom, with upper faith, the law of Hesed appears on her tongue, and not on another’s.
Scrutinize the words because indeed he must take his hand out of his bosom, as “bosom” means “I, and you will not have.” The taking out of the hand is the expansion of knowledge [Daat]. If—when he takes out a hand for expansion of flavors [also reasons] of Torah and secrets of Torah—he remembers his root well, not to change its flavor [also reason], and knows the benefit of taking his hand out of his bosom, it follows that law and judgment are tied to one another as two friends that do not separate. At that time, the abundance flows in its ways properly.
By that you will understand the meaning of “And he put his hand into his bosom,” which is the acceptance of the law, “and took it out,” that he came to extend the expansion of Daat without strengthening to be adhered to the root, as well, which is the bosom. Then, “Behold, his hand was as leprous as snow.” It is translated in Yonatan Ben Uziel, “His hands were closed,” meaning that the fountains of abundance had closed, and there was no correction except to be strengthened once again. “And he put his hand back into his bosom,” accepting the law, and then, “when he took it out of his bosom, it returned to be as his flesh.” That is, the law accompanies and connects to the taking out of the hand, and law and judgment are connected. At that time, the flow of life and abundance returns to its place.
This is the meaning of “And if it comes to pass that they do not believe... to the voice of the first sign,” he will take out his hand not from his bosom. “And they will believe the voice of the latter sign,” since he will show that by taking his hand out of his bosom it regained its health.
The third sign is a profound matter. The Nile is the god of Egypt, and Pharaoh is the god of the Nile, as he said, “My Nile is to me, and I have made me.” We have already said that Pharaoh robbed to himself all the abundance that came down from the Rosh for Israel.
However, he gave to Israel the extract of the abundance that he robbed, and the extract given by Pharaoh is called “Nile.” This is what waters all who dwell in Egypt. It is called “bread of idleness,” for it does not require labor. This is why there was fear that the children of Israel would be blemished after the redemption from Egypt with the bread of the mighty, as it happened in the desert when they said, “We remember the fish that we ate in Egypt for free.” This is the correction, “And the water... became blood upon the dry land,” for everyone will see that they were disqualified from the drink of Israel. Afterward, the blood of Passover and the circumcision blood came to them from that.
This is also the meaning of “She looks well to the ways of her household.” It means that the water of the Nile became blood on the land, and then, “and does not eat the bread of idleness.” This is a very deep subject, to be elaborated on elsewhere.
Yehuda Leib
M. Laitman: I would recommend reading it again.
Reader: (26:12) Letter 10 To the disciples, may the Lord be upon them:
... I terribly regret the dwindling organs that external circumstances overcame them from joining you. May the Creator give them strength so they can join us, and the Creator will be with them.
I understand that you are not engaged in unifications of mind and heart as I would like you to. Still, do what you can, and the salvation of the Lord is as the blink of an eye. The most important thing before you today is the unity of friends. Exert in that more and more, for it can recompense for all the faults.
It is said, “An exiled disciple, his Rav [teacher] is exiled with him.” This was perplexing to our sages, for how can there be slandering in the Torah and work of the disciple to the point of expelling him from the domain of the Creator, especially once he is clung to a true teacher? They explained that when the disciple descends, it seems to him that the Rav has descended, too. And because it is so, it really is so, meaning that he can enjoy his Rav only to the extent that he assumes in his heart. Therefore, all he has is a low and inferior Rav, as much as he values him. Thus, his Rav is exiled with him.
The exile and enslavement in Egypt begin with the words, “And a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.” That is, a new ruling appeared in the minds of each and every one, a newly made ruling, since they fell from their previous degree. We have said that “an exiled disciple, his Rav [teacher] is exiled with him.” Thus, clearly, they did not know Joseph. In other words, they attained him only to the extent that they valued him in their hearts.
Therefore, they depicted the image of Joseph as they themselves were. Because of it, they did not know Joseph and the enslavement began. Otherwise, the righteous would certainly protect them and exile or enslavement would not be depicted to them at all.
Their enslavement in Homer [mortar/plaster] and Levenim [“bricks,” as well as “white”] is explained: Mortar is the iniquity of the Hamor [donkey] by which one is sentenced for the thought. The bricks [also “white”] are the repentance, when they are granted upper mercies and temporarily obtain upper light from the faith of the holy fathers and are whitened from their iniquities. However, it was not permanent, and because of it, they were incarnating and coming into every work of the field, meaning continuation of hard work that concerns the rest of the Mitzvot [commandments].
Our sages said, “The intermediate, both judge them.” This is why that Klipa [shell/peel] is called Pharaoh, with the letters Peh-Hey Reish-Ayin [initials of Peh Ra (bad mouth)]. That is, the Malchut in Mochin is called Peh [mouth], meaning it is a resolution and consent not to break His word, and all that comes out of His mouth will be done.
In the exile in Egypt, the ruling was that of the above-mentioned bad mouth, and they returned to evil. Thus, although they were rewarded with some upper illumination from the first nine, it could not be absorbed in the Guf [body] because of the bad mouth, the opposite of “Peh of Kedusha [holiness].” That is, the back of the neck was blocking the abundance that comes down from the Rosh [head], and sucked out all the abundance that began to come down for Israel. This is why no slave could escape Egypt, since Pharaoh put a great charm over the openings of Egypt, as our sages said.
By this we understand the verse, “And I know that the king of Egypt would not let you go, except by a mighty hand.” Through Moses, His servant, the Creator announced that no mighty hand or powers in the world would help with this evil Klipa as it surrenders only to the Creator. This is the meaning of “I and not a messenger,” and the meaning of “And I will put forth My hand and strike Egypt... And I will grant this people favor in the eyes of the Egyptians…”
Now we shall interpret the enunciation of redemption and Moses’ mission. It is written,
“And Moses answered and said, ‘But they will not believe me’... for they will say, ‘The Lord did not appear to you.’” Interpretation: Because the mouth of Kedusha was in exile, as in, “for I am slow of speech and slow of tongue,” Moses, the faithful shepherd, argued before the Creator, “But they will not believe me.” Even if I tie Israel to me and bring down some bestowal for them, the Klipa of Pharaoh sucks it out and robs it from them. And although they are attached to me, they will still not listen to me. That is, while the Klipa of Pharaoh has dominion, and a mouth and speech in the exile, still, if they believed in the faithful shepherd properly, the children of Israel would be able to listen to Moses, who is above the mouth and speech. If they strengthened themselves in that, they would certainly be saved from the Klipa of Pharaoh.
This is what Moses, the faithful shepherd, complained about to the Creator, “They will say, ‘The Lord did not appear to you,’” as explained above, “And a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.” Upon their descent into matter [substance], they will also deny the greatness of Moses, the faithful shepherd, so how was it possible for Moses to redeem them from that evil and strong Klipa?
Therefore, the Creator gave Moses three signs to show to the children of Israel and taught him to arrange these signs before them one at a time. The Creator also promised him that He would help him from above so he can show it to them. After the children of Israel accept these signs from him, they will come to listen to Moses, and then he will be able to redeem them from that bitter exile.
Now I will explain the three signs. The first sign is the turning of the staff into a serpent, and the serpent into a staff. The second sign is that by taking out his hand not from his bosom, it was as leprous as snow. And when he took out his hand from his bosom, it returned to be as his flesh. The third sign is that by spilling the water of the Nile on the land it turned into blood.
Now I will interpret how He showed them to Israel. In the hand of the redeemer was a staff, which is the faithful shepherd. He is holding the staff to steer the heart of Israel to their father in heaven. If he throws it to the ground, it means that the children of Israel are taking His staff to do with it as they wish (Artza [to the ground] is like Ratzon [desire]). “And it turned into a serpent” means that their sin seemed to them like animals.
Before they approached his staff, their sin was considered still. After they brought themselves to his staff, it became an actual serpent until “And Moses fled from it” (according to what Israel valued themselves, as in “Who did not know Joseph”).
Subsequently, when Moses came to save them from the serpent’s bite, he gripped the serpent by its tail and not by its head because when a false redeemer comes to save Israel, he grips the serpent by its head, to break the serpent’s head, as so is the way of all snake-catchers.
But a true redeemer grabs it specifically by its tail (according to the secret that that serpent bends its head and strikes with its tail, which I already interpreted for you), “And it became a staff in his hand,” for then it really works in their hearts to turn them to the side of merit. And once the children of Israel receive that sign, the Creator gives him permission and authority to show them the second sign.
I have already interpreted for you the words of our sages, “‘Will sacrifice him to His will.’ How so? He is forced until he says, ‘I want.’” This is so because when discussing the thought, the filth of the serpent will be corrected through the offering that atones for the thought.
Yet, making the offering should be with love and fear, and one who needs a sacrifice can toil over fear, but not over love, so the offering is disqualified for lack of love. Our sages say about that that He—the Creator—is forced, as in “My sons defeated Me,” for the Zivug of one who works out of fear is called “forced.” Until the Creator says and reveals to him His will, and tells him, “I want” this work. Then it becomes apparent that there was no coercion to begin with, but an actual Zivug with love and friendship.
This is the meaning of “She opens her mouth in wisdom, and the teaching of mercy is on her tongue.” In the opening of the mouth, upper Hochma appears because at that time, when the Klipa of “bad mouth” parts from the Kedusha, the “mouth of Kedusha” comes out. This is the meaning of opening the mouth wide, and there are no more harm doers to break his word since “He who knows the mysteries testifies about him that he will not return to folly.” Promptly, he is rewarded with upper Hochma because the disclosure of law and judgment always come together. This is the meaning of “She opens her mouth in wisdom.”
And once he has reached the disclosure of Hochma, with which he was rewarded only through his prior labor in his Zivugim [couplings], coercively, it turns out that were it not for the tongue of Nukva, in which there is the power of labor, he would not have been rewarded with anything. Thus, it becomes apparent that to begin with, even the forced Zivugim were actually Zivugim of love and empathy. This is the meaning of “and the teaching of mercy is on her tongue,” specifically “on her tongue,” and not in another tongue.
Let us return to our topic that the first sign—that by Moses gripping its tail, it turned into a staff in his hand. This is the meaning of “repentance from fear,” as in “She opens her mouth in wisdom,” that from the time it is established as a staff—and the Klipa is sent away and does not return—begins the root of disclosure of upper Hochma.
The meaning of the second sign is a root for repentance from love. When he brought his hand into his bosom, with upper faith, the law of Hesed appears on her tongue, and not on another’s.
Scrutinize the words because indeed he must take his hand out of his bosom, as “bosom” means “I, and you will not have.” The taking out of the hand is the expansion of knowledge [Daat]. If—when he takes out a hand for expansion of flavors [also reasons] of Torah and secrets of Torah—he remembers his root well, not to change its flavor [also reason], and knows the benefit of taking his hand out of his bosom, it follows that law and judgment are tied to one another as two friends that do not separate. At that time, the abundance flows in its ways properly.
By that you will understand the meaning of “And he put his hand into his bosom,” which is the acceptance of the law, “and took it out,” that he came to extend the expansion of Daat without strengthening to be adhered to the root, as well, which is the bosom. Then, “Behold, his hand was as leprous as snow.” It is translated in Yonatan Ben Uziel, “His hands were closed,” meaning that the fountains of abundance had closed, and there was no correction except to be strengthened once again. “And he put his hand back into his bosom,” accepting the law, and then, “when he took it out of his bosom, it returned to be as his flesh.” That is, the law accompanies and connects to the taking out of the hand, and law and judgment are connected. At that time, the flow of life and abundance returns to its place.
This is the meaning of “And if it comes to pass that they do not believe... to the voice of the first sign,” he will take out his hand not from his bosom. “And they will believe the voice of the latter sign,” since he will show that by taking his hand out of his bosom it regained its health.
The third sign is a profound matter. The Nile is the god of Egypt, and Pharaoh is the god of the Nile, as he said, “My Nile is to me, and I have made me.” We have already said that Pharaoh robbed to himself all the abundance that came down from the Rosh for Israel.
However, he gave to Israel the extract of the abundance that he robbed, and the extract given by Pharaoh is called “Nile.” This is what waters all who dwell in Egypt. It is called “bread of idleness,” for it does not require labor. This is why there was fear that the children of Israel would be blemished after the redemption from Egypt with the bread of the mighty, as it happened in the desert when they said, “We remember the fish that we ate in Egypt for free.” This is the correction, “And the water... became blood upon the dry land,” for everyone will see that they were disqualified from the drink of Israel. Afterward, the blood of Passover and the circumcision blood came to them from that.
This is also the meaning of “She looks well to the ways of her household.” It means that the water of the Nile became blood on the land, and then, “and does not eat the bread of idleness.” This is a very deep subject, to be elaborated on elsewhere.
Yehuda Leib
M. Laitman: Okay, thank you to the reader. Questions?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (50:58) He writes here that a false redeemer coming to save Israel, grabs the serpent by the head. And this is how you can identify a false prophet, a false redeemer, or a true redeemer? As the true one holds the serpent by the tail, Is that some kind of sign for the people to recognize who's a true leader, who is not?
M. Laitman: One's attitude to the serpent becomes clear, this way.
Student: And the serpent is the will to receive in some kind of extreme form?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: So, the people look at whoever comes to them saying, I'm the leader. And they should see that this leader knows how to work with the will to receive and the other one does not? And therefore, it's a false leader?
M. Laitman: Let's say. Yes, that's how we identify it.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (52:09) He writes, “I understand that you do not engage so much in the unifications of the mind, and therefore, do as much as you can. And God's redemption will be as the blink of an eye. And the main thing before you today is the unity of the friends. Make more and more efforts in that direction, because it can repay or compensate for all the lacks”. So, the question is how does unity between friends help compensate for all the lacks?
M. Laitman: We talked about it a lot. Did you ask the friends?
Student: No, I’ll try to focus the question: Let's say I have a business and there, the goal is to make as much money as possible, a corporeal business. Now let's say I do some sale, right, and I see that income rises. I invest in the customers, income rises; I see a connection between my action and the outcome. The question is how do we see the influence, the effect of our work in the Ten? You annul yourself but there is concealment, there, also. There is concealment with respect to the Creator and also within the Ten, there is concealment.
M. Laitman: Of course, if there was no concealment, you would always work in order to receive. If you see a connection between your work and the result, then you already aim for the result.
Student: So, in the Ten, for example. We had a meeting and we felt connection very powerfully, we prepared for that meeting, also. Now, that sensation of connection, does it advance us towards a connection with the Creator?
M. Laitman: Of course, only directly or not, that's the question.
Student: Right, so we've been doing a lot of work here over the years, annulling ourselves. But we don't see how this affects our connection with the Creator. We have no indication regarding our progress.
M. Laitman: Why?
Student: Because within the Ten I can feel the connection, I can feel all these states, and what happens when I annul myself. But between that and advancing towards the quality of bestowal, I don't see a connection. How to connect these two things?
M. Laitman: Don't you learn that from these texts?
Student: I learn it, intellectually, it's written but emotionally, how do you take that feeling of connection and all these things. And connect that to the quality of bestowal, towards advancing more and more towards the quality of bestowal? Intellectually, I know that this is what's written and this is what you explained to us. But emotionally, it's difficult to tie these things together.
M. Laitman: Yes. Well, how can we answer him? None of the friends can answer? Go ahead.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (55:50) We have to fortify ourselves with faith, that's all our work. He also speaks about this, about the exertion, it's written towards the end, they will not eat the bread of shame. So, we're not lazy. The bread of idleness, rather. And it says” here, because he came to the revelation of Hochma, which he did not earn. But through his previous work on the Zivugim by way of coercion, it follows that it rises to the tongue of the Nukva. And without the quality of exertion, he would not be awarded with anything”. Now, what does it mean that he would not have been awarded with anything, if not for the power of his exertion?
M. Laitman: As we see all over the world, anyone can learn, everyone can read the Torah with all the interpretations, commentaries. And then what, they don't achieve the remedy of the Torah.
Student: If I may say a few words about the letter, it’s very unique and I don't say that for no reason. I counted at least 20 times, where Baal HaSulam says, and this is the secret of…. Usually it's used about once, this is the secret of, etc., and I like digging into that and seeing where he took that secret from. And I go to find the source, and at least 20 times here, he says, and this is the secret of. There's much to learn from this letter.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (57:59) To answer the previous question: Yes, it is possible to see our advancement the more we go above reason.
M. Laitman: Very well. More?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (58:36) If possible, I'll read: “Now, I'll interpret for you. It’s a matter of redemption, Moses. Moses came and said, they will not believe me, and so on. Because they said that they will say that the Lord did not appear to you, because the mouth of Kedusha was in exile in the secret of, as in the secret heavy of mouth, heavy of tongue. Therefore, Moses was the loyal shepherd, claiming before the Creator, they will not believe me. Because even if I connect Israel to me and bring down to them some bestowal, the shell of Pharaoh will suck it and rob it from them. And although they are attached to me, they will not listen to me. Meaning that while the Klipa of Pharaoh has dominion and a mouth and speech in the exiles, still if they believed in the Faithful Shepherd properly, the children of Israel would be able to listen to Moses, who is above the mouth and speech. If they strengthened themselves in that, they would certainly be saved from the Klipa of Pharaoh”. So even in Egypt, it seemed that they didn't need any miracles and such things. They would have done everything necessary if they just listened to Moses.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:00:24) To answer the friend, what he read, the unity of friends make efforts towards that more and more, because it can compensate for all the lacks. So, by us trying to connect, reading these writings, we draw upon ourselves more attainment, more understanding. And it all depends on the connection between us. So, a lack is a place devoid of light and the moment we connect, the light can be revealed. Now, may I say something about my impression from the letter?
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: He speaks of three signs: These signs sound like the spiritual Partzuf. The first one speaks of the Rosh, grabbing the serpent, the screen. There's a will to receive in order to receive there and we want to not use that. So, in the first sign, it seems to me he speaks of the construction of the Masach and working in order to bestow. In the second sign, he speaks about the Toch, the inner part after the Masach is built. And there, he can receive, as he writes here, the expansion of reason, the secrets of Torah, all that happens in the Toch, the inside of the body, after he has the Masach and the Rosh. Now, the last sign, I suppose he speaks of the Sof of the Partzuf, the ending. He calls it the God of the Nile. Pharaoh being the God of the Nile. And how there's blood in the Nile, and it cannot be drunk by Israel. That's how it sounds to me. That's my impression of these three signs.
M. Laitman: Okay. If more or less everyone hears, then, yes?
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:02:48) Maybe the friend’s discernment, there, the intention to listen to Moses as a sort of intervention by the upper force. Walking the true path, following the books and the lack towards a renewing of actions for the construction of the center of the Ten. Only there can unity be formed against the pull of the externality. And that's why it's necessary for revelation.
M. Laitman: Okay, more or less I see people heard.
Question (Beer Sheva): (01:03:52) I'll read an excerpt here and ask a question. So, a student who is exiled, his Rav is exiled with him, meaning that it was difficult for the sages to explain how the iniquities of the work of the students will affect the Rav so much that the Rav will be driven out. But if one is attached to a true Rav, and if the students descend, then it would seem to him that the Rav descends also. Meaning that he cannot enjoy his Rav, but only to the extent that he values the Rav in his heart. And so, his Rav may appear degraded and fallen to him, to the extent that he, the student, is fallen.” So, my question is, this text speaking of how if I go out to exile my Rav, he's exiled with me. According to this, what can be deduced from this, correct me if I'm wrong, that we're eternally attached to the Rav. But we don't accept it sometimes, and therefore, he is exiled with me. So, if I grow distant to the Creator, then I feel that he is growing apart from me. But in truth, we're always connected. Is that true?
M. Laitman: Correct, correct.
Question (Petah Tikva Center): (01:05:47) When we read it the second time, I tried focusing on one sentence, maybe you can help me understand it. He writes that “the sacrificing of the offering has to be done with love and fear. And with the sacrifice, one can make an effort to do that with fear, but not with love. But then the sacrifice is disqualified due to the lack of love. And this is why they say that he's forced” and so on. So, I'm thinking, you come to study here, I'm trying to understand this, if you come to study here, and you don't do that with love. If you don't do it wholeheartedly, it doesn't count, rather to the opposite. He says here that “the sacrifice has to be done with love and fear. And you can exert in fear but not in love. And therefore, the offering is disqualified due to the lack of love”. So, what does it mean, when I come here, to have some special intention?
M. Laitman: He writes to you, clearly.
Student: I come to study here, Look, I try to understand: If I come to study here but I don't do it with the intention of love, it's disqualified, even sitting here is disqualified. So how can I fix that? I come here to study, to attain something but if I come here and don't attain anything, what have I done? It's better not to come.
M. Laitman: To attain the love.
Student: Right, but for now I don't have it, so?
M. Laitman: So, you have to continue.
Student: But he says the work doesn't count. You can sit here all the time, even until tomorrow, but the work doesn't count, so what should I do?
M. Laitman: To the extent that you long for love.
Student: Yes, but what kind of work, what should I do?
M. Laitman: This is what you see from what's written.
Student: What, to anoint myself before the friend? To do work? Is that the intention?
M. Laitman: Yes, yes, to discover the unity.
Student: So, all the work, we already know.
M. Laitman: Yes.
Student: And without that it's a waste of time.
M. Laitman: Yes, simple. That's it, moving on to the next part.
Reader: (01:08:18) We'll continue with the next part of the lesson. And before, sing a song!